Result for query 'tc;two;delay'
Archive Top | Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
3:
Re: symetrix delay PLEASE READ 10:
Subject: Re: symetrix delay PLEASE READ 24:
> >Not every delay is a loop machine. In fact all delay machines only
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
20:
>Two cents on the ongoing "tyranny of ambient" thread... 69:
>some sort of real-time looping based around a delay unit or a Big Three 99:
idea shows up in many places. From simple delay pedals, to dj-loopers, to 103:
eventides, to tc 2290's....it's all over the place. One particular set of
39:
> idea shows up in many places. From simple delay pedals, to dj-loopers, to 44:
> eventides, to tc 2290's....it's all over the place. 57:
done to a looped signal. Take one of the Boss digital delay/loop pedals 75:
convincing me that there aren't some serious differenes between the two,
199710/msg00063:cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message
463:
mow some lawns, start a lemonade stand, work a geek job or two, whatever, 486:
Just get a delay. ANY delay. Used Digitech and Boss delays with up to 487:
two seconds of memory are dirt cheap, well under $100. The little Zoom 488:
delay thing costs less than $150, and is programmable, tap tempo, etc.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
40:
20 sec. of full bandwidth delay (stereo I think). Will be about $200 more 69:
5.7 sec of delay. 75:
Electro-Harmonix guy told me that the 16-sec delay was still in the works, 82:
tc electronicâs FireworX multifx looked extremely powerful, like a
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
39:
There are basically two Fripps in regards to looping. 46:
allowed a long delay usually between 8 and 14 seconds, letting Fripp 65:
Using TC Electronics TS2290 delays, he replaced the tape decks. With guitar 71:
delays may are may not all be set at the same delay times, but I believe
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
32:
sweeping through delay times, it almost sounds like a TB-303. 35:
>Korg and TC Electronics units have ring mod. The only other pedal I can 54:
type of music. Like you take two sticks, put 'em
20:
What I never see mentioned is what Robert was doing between these two 33:
>There are basically two Fripps in regards to looping. 41:
>allowed a long delay usually between 8 and 14 seconds, letting Fripp 62:
>Using TC Electronics TS2290 delays, he replaced the tape decks. With
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
maybe nobody replied because comparing the two units doesn't make that much 29:
not willing to lugg 3 different units (tc 2290, Rang, PCM 80 with which I 36:
of the EH 26 sec. delay ....?) 38:
single-rack multieffects (tc G-Force) that subs for a whole fridge of 80#s
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
25:
> maybe nobody replied because comparing the two units 33:
had a more sophisticated delay mode. 41:
> of the EH 26 sec. delay ....?) 52:
> single-rack multieffects (tc G-Force) that subs for a
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
20:
You might want to look at the DOD DFX-98 delay. It does looping, has 8 21:
seconds of delay, and a delay time knob allows you to adjust the 30:
>maybe nobody replied because comparing the two units doesn't make that 41:
>not willing to lugg 3 different units (tc 2290, Rang, PCM 80 with which I
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
20:
Re: Tapped delay pedals?, July 24, 1998 44:
Re: Processors: TC Electronics G-Force, July 31, 1998 131:
Internet as a delay (was Re: Streaming from our recording studio), July 30, 1998 135:
Re: Tapped delay pedals?, July 23, 1998
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
20:
>ostinatos. So it's great that you can sync two Echoplexes. BTW, you 21:
>probably can't sync two different units, say a Jamman & an EDP? 27:
>that seems to be lost with some more advanced units like the tc 2290 and 33:
correspondingly the delay time, pitch, etc. Since the audio quality of
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
61:
Re: projeKCt two, October 12, 1998 96:
PROJEkT TWO Revisited..., October 26, 1998 98:
Re: TC-2290?, October 08, 1998 149:
Re: projeKCt two, October 13, 1998
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
43:
You can also set your Jam Man in delay mode and have decaying long delays 47:
major advantages of the TC 2290's that Fripp loves to use. I've yet to 51:
delay mode. My partner Steve Geest loves to use this approach. On the first 52:
Looper's CD we were both using this approach with two jam men each to
84:
>the front panels of FX from Ensoniq, Roland, tc, Korg, Lexicon, etc., has 102:
>Want a plain-vanilla delay that's not quite there in the presets? FIRST, 137:
>basic delay blocks that each max out at 660ms, but whose parameters have 141:
>all of them. A 10-sec. delay uses less than half the available dsp
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
52:
the front panels of FX from Ensoniq, Roland, tc, Korg, Lexicon, etc., has 66:
Want a plain-vanilla delay that's not quite there in the presets? FIRST, 98:
basic delay blocks that each max out at 660ms, but whose parameters have 102:
all of them. A 10-sec. delay uses less than half the available dsp
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
70:
TC 2290 a request and a warning, May 25, 1999 372:
Re: TC 2290 a request and a warning, May 25, 1999 394:
[Fwd: Emigre News-Two New Books], May 07, 1999 686:
Re: TC 2290 a request and a warning, May 25, 1999
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
32:
been as an aside to one of the first two eighties-era KC tours. He gushed 44:
>> Have everyone forgotten that EH 16 second delay contraption circa 1984? 67:
>I saw him perform in Salisbury Cathederal (97) with his TC electronics
71:
Re: TC 2290 a request and a warning, June 02, 1999 358:
tc 2290, June 26, 1999 372:
Re: LDCD # 1 Reissue - PART TWO, June 25, 1999 402:
Re: tc 2290 FS $1300/What About Bob?, June 25, 1999
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199908/msg00350:Re: MPX-G2, FireworX...and Pluggo!
25:
>that indicated that you could only have one delay per 29:
The G2 allows only one delay per preset. But, besides Chorus, Delay, 31:
and the analog gain section, there's two "Effect" blocks, which both have 37:
assuming you've got processing power still available. But not delay,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199910/msg00425:Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte
3:
Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte 10:
Subject: Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte 35:
pedales: tc sustain/eq, tc 12-stage phaser, zvex fuzzfactory (& sometimes)
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199910/msg00585:Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte
3:
Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte 10:
Subject: Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte 24:
Delay Modeler which appears to have around 14 secs with all the Boomerang
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199910/msg00428:Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte
3:
Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte 10:
Subject: Re: Two looping questions from a neophyte 41:
>pedales: tc sustain/eq, tc 12-stage phaser, zvex fuzzfactory (& sometimes)
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00950:Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!!
3:
Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 10:
Subject: Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 19:
>Ok Travis and others concerned about MIDI on the new TC D-TWO... On
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00413:Re: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!!
3:
Re: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 10:
Subject: Re: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 19:
MSRP according to Simon at TC U.S. will be $699.00... he went on to
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: tc D-Two specs? 10:
Subject: Re: tc D-Two specs? 19:
I called TC U.S. and talked with Simon... he said full midi cc
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
23:
|There's a new TC Electronic "budget" unit called the D-Two coming 25:
|buckolas. It has 10 secs of *stereo* delay and a hold function. 27:
|and from the ad copy a very full featured multi-tap tempo delay 29:
|one. Should ship in late November according to TC U.S.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00412:Re: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!!
3:
Re: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 10:
Subject: Re: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 30:
> Ok Travis and others concerned about MIDI on the new TC D-TWO... On
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
TC D-TWO v/s Roland SDE3000 10:
Subject: TC D-TWO v/s Roland SDE3000 19:
>>>Ok Travis and others concerned about MIDI on the new TC D-TWO... On
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
20:
> "There's a new TC Electronic "budget" unit called the D-Two coming 22:
buckolas. It has 10 secs of *stereo* delay and a hold function. 24:
and from the ad copy a very full featured multi-tap tempo delay 26:
one. Should ship in late November according to TC U.S. "
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00437:Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!!
3:
Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 10:
Subject: Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 19:
>>>Ok Travis and others concerned about MIDI on the new TC D-TWO... On
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
Just click on the two dsp's below the top picture... 23:
There's also about the same info in a TC press release on the home 35:
|There's a new TC Electronic "budget" unit called the D-Two coming 37:
|buckolas. It has 10 secs of *stereo* delay and a hold function.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00411:Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!!
3:
Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 10:
Subject: Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 19:
Ok Travis and others concerned about MIDI on the new TC D-TWO... On
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00457:Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!!
3:
Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 10:
Subject: Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 21:
Lots of bitching about short delay time deleted...
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00490:Re: DSP ... DJRND2 and TC Dual Delay...
3:
Re: DSP ... DJRND2 and TC Dual Delay... 10:
Subject: Re: DSP ... DJRND2 and TC Dual Delay... 25:
> But the new t.c. two seams to be just a delay, so I'm not sure there is a
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
27:
FA: TC Electronics G-Force & Digitech RDS8000 Time Machine, November 27, 1999 74:
Re: delay -> looper, November 20, 1999 78:
delay -> looper, November 19, 1999 120:
Re: 16 second delay problem, November 24, 1999
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00462:Re: DSP ... DJRND2 and TC Dual Delay...
3:
Re: DSP ... DJRND2 and TC Dual Delay... 10:
Subject: Re: DSP ... DJRND2 and TC Dual Delay... 22:
But the new t.c. two seams to be just a delay, so I'm not sure there is a
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00291:Re: tc D-Two, Disppointed again? NOT YET!
3:
Re: tc D-Two, Disppointed again? NOT YET! 10:
Subject: Re: tc D-Two, Disppointed again? NOT YET! 19:
I've spoken with Simon at TC Electronic US and he said it did have
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
There's a new TC Electronic "budget" unit called the D-Two coming 21:
buckolas. It has 10 secs of *stereo* delay and a hold function. 23:
and from the ad copy a very full featured multi-tap tempo delay 25:
one. Should ship in late November according to TC U.S.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
tc D-Two specs? 10:
Subject: tc D-Two specs? 27:
> |There's a new TC Electronic "budget" unit called the D-Two coming
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
tc D-Two, Disppointed again? 10:
Subject: tc D-Two, Disppointed again? 19:
Looking through tc's website (http://www.tcelectronic.com/), under the
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199911/msg00428:Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!!
3:
Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 10:
Subject: Re: RE: Digital Echoplex and TC Dual Delay... MIDI!!!!! 19:
>>Ok Travis and others concerned about MIDI on the new TC D-TWO... On
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
"There's a new TC Electronic "budget" unit called the D-Two coming 21:
buckolas. It has 10 secs of *stereo* delay and a hold function. 23:
and from the ad copy a very full featured multi-tap tempo delay 25:
one. Should ship in late November according to TC U.S. "
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199912/msg00832:Re: New looper guidance wanted/needed
43:
> How much delay time is necessary to do soundscape-like effects? 50:
20-second delay, and the stuff on "November Suite" and "That Which Passes" 52:
he'll have two, three, or four loops going simultaneously, each with a 55:
> How many delay units are needed to do decent soundscapes?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC D-Two 10:
Subject: Re: TC D-Two 25:
hit the streets now pretty soon. It's a new TC Electronic "budget" box.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
239:
Re: looper's missing delay presets -- why?, December 02, 1999 287:
Re: looper's missing delay presets -- why?, December 02, 1999 298:
Re: New Line6 Delay/Looper Questions, December 01, 1999 305:
TC D-Two, December 02, 1999
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
199912/msg00831:Re: New looper guidance wanted/needed
30:
There's quite a bit of overlap between the two terms as they're generally 36:
>How much delay time is necessary to do soundscape-like effects? 38:
It's surprising how much can be done with under two seconds, but obviously 42:
>How many delay units are needed to do decent soundscapes?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
speaking of delays w/ MIDI implementation, anyone used the TC. Electronic 20:
D-Two? Did I miss any posted reviews? 29:
>two main reasones: 47:
>2.midi clock both in loop and delay mode
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: Re: TC D-Two Delay 20:
>... Noone uses delay as much as I do...
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 10:
Subject: Re: Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 25:
bought mine. It has the cleanest, most accurate delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: Re: TC D-Two Delay 19:
Hi Dan... Everything looks great on the D-Two... I'm still wanting to
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200006/msg00154:FS: TC D-Two Delay on Harmony Central [not by me]
3:
FS: TC D-Two Delay on Harmony Central [not by me] 10:
Subject: FS: TC D-Two Delay on Harmony Central [not by me] 21:
T.C. ELECTRONIC D-2 DELAY...LIKE NEW!!!
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
TC D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: TC D-Two Delay 19:
I've been looking at getting the TC D-Two Delay. Does anyone here have any
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: Re: TC D-Two Delay 24:
>Subject: TC D-Two Delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
170:
Re: Re: TC Electronics D-TWO, June 28, 2000 176:
Re: TC D-Two Delay, June 12, 2000 178:
Re: TC D-Two Delay, June 12, 2000 179:
Re: TC Electronics D-TWO, June 28, 2000
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 23:
bought mine. It has the cleanest, most accurate delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: Re: TC D-Two Delay 20:
delay as much as I do. It is a wonderful machine and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: Re: TC D-Two Delay 21:
>>... Noone uses delay as much as I do...
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
TC Electronics D-TWO 10:
Subject: TC Electronics D-TWO 19:
Does anyone know if this is a decent delay unit to use for looping? I
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 10:
Subject: Re: Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 30:
> delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics D-TWO 21:
to get control of. OF course, it sounds wonderful, in the tc style, and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: Re: TC D-Two Delay 19:
I think it will have to be a totaling of all delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
44:
> It's hard to beat the delay fun that's hiding in a TC Electronic D-Two; 46:
> Korg SDD-3300 is a *wild* triple delay machine that's VERY underrated; 56:
> For reverbs, the price/performance ratio of the TC Electronic M-One is
65:
> It's hard to beat the delay fun that's hiding in a TC Electronic D-Two; 67:
> Korg SDD-3300 is a *wild* triple delay machine that's VERY underrated; 77:
> For reverbs, the price/performance ratio of the TC Electronic M-One is
30:
It's hard to beat the delay fun that's hiding in a TC Electronic D-Two; 32:
Korg SDD-3300 is a *wild* triple delay machine that's VERY underrated; the 41:
For reverbs, the price/performance ratio of the TC Electronic M-One is
30:
reverbs by TC Works, Waves, Steinberg, etc. 42:
>was some discernible delay. If you're a player you don't really want 72:
>> I'm mostly interested in two aspects of the programs. One is live
20:
>It's hard to beat the delay fun that's hiding in a TC Electronic 21:
>D-Two; the Korg SDD-3300 is a *wild* triple delay machine that's
26:
>delay/looping. 39:
AUDIO : this has the following libraries, Delay modules, Dynamic Modules, 94:
two 118:
4000s have only 10,5 seconds of delay memory, 7000 has 43sec, Orville has
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
>anyone know if the memory on the new tc electronics D-One delay line is 24:
>comes with 10 seconds onboard... be nice if it was a minute or two... 35:
It's a great delay line... The rhythmic repeats are incredible fun. I have
19:
anyone know if the memory on the new tc electronics D-One delay line is 22:
comes with 10 seconds onboard... be nice if it was a minute or two...
3:
Re: TC Electronics 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics 22:
>Does anyone know the new TC Electronc D-Two delay?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC Electronics 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics 23:
>>Does anyone know the new TC Electronc D-Two delay? Is it a valid looping
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
TC Electronics 10:
Subject: TC Electronics 22:
Does anyone know the new TC Electronc D-Two
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC Electronics 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics 21:
> Unforunately, I'm not rich enough for the wonderful TC 2290...
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC Electronics 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics 27:
It depends of two things... 1-your guitar/preamp relation 2- How you turn
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC Electronics 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics 20:
Does anyone know the new TC Electronc D-Two delay? Is it a valid looping device?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: TC Electronics 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics 22:
TC 2290...
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
>From the Big Briar site: "with delay times as short as 40 milliseconds 26:
John may be using a part with a short delay, but if so, he's using more 27:
of them. At half the price, and twice the delay time, the Blacet module 29:
these two units? Now if only the Time Machine came in one of those cute
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
20:
Big Briar's Delay, TC D-2, Blacet time machine, I think he had also a 24:
one.. It was one of the two you mentioned).. Instead, I bought an old 60:
> >is THE analog delay to get. How about a close second that is to be had 71:
> The price of a good analog delay is high 'cause of the price of the BBD's
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
550:
Heyoka_face_eater, wils0450@tc.umn.edu 795:
native instruments spektral delay, January 21, 2001 854:
OT: TC electronic D Two MIDI program change, January 28, 2001 1341:
Repeater Delay, January 20, 2001
200101/msg00897:OT: TC electronic D Two MIDI program change
3:
OT: TC electronic D Two MIDI program change 10:
Subject: OT: TC electronic D Two MIDI program change 21:
Hello there. I've just bought a wonderful TC D-Two
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
The AD202 is pretty full-featured, with delay, flange, stereo chorus, and 27:
two inputs: mic and instrument (both 1/4"), which are selectable. 30:
delay 31:
section only has controls for delay time, regen, and blend. The regen
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
453:
Repeater Delay, March 19, 2001 502:
Heyoka_face_eater, wils0450@tc.umn.edu 587:
Re: TC Electronics SUSTAIN+ PARAMETRIC EQUALIZER, March 28, 2001 588:
Re: TC Electronics SUSTAIN+ PARAMETRIC EQUALIZER, March 29, 2001
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200105/msg00323:RE: jamman footswitch >> midi controllers
21:
>controller's delay time unacceptable as well. I'd go with hard wired 35:
PMC 80, Korg AM8000r and TC D-Two, all of which have dedicated
20:
D-Two, and it definitely qualifies as a live-looper. 31:
>I recently bought a TC Electronic D-Two delay box. Having used it for 3 35:
>as it has 10 sec mono delay and excellent musical features, including a 44:
>that, the D-two and an MPX1 we improvised some incredible beats.
21:
(seems to be a nice delay though.) If you think otherwise, how about 29:
>D-Two, and it definitely qualifies as a live-looper. 40:
>>I recently bought a TC Electronic D-Two delay box. Having used it for 3 44:
>>as it has 10 sec mono delay and excellent musical features, including a
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200108/msg00970:EDP pseudo-multi-tracks (was Re: Conceptual "Repeater" question)
41:
4 different places: delay based interfaces, sampler based interfaces, 49:
delays, or the TC D-Two, or the Korg DL8000 were delay based approaches. 63:
want, with a longer part over the top. To the listener it sounds like two 92:
listener's perspective, it is exactly the same as having two tracks and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
I recently bought a TC Electronic D-Two delay box. Having used it for 3 22:
as it has 10 sec mono delay and excellent musical features, including a 30:
that, the D-two and an MPX1 we improvised some incredible beats.
38:
amp; PCM80; EDP; Korg AM8000r; TC D-Two Delay; DBX Vocal Processor/Mic Pre
23:
category if used as a delay rather than as a looper. (For the price, 24:
however, in looking for a delay effect, I'd have to think about whether I'd 25:
rather get an Echo Pro or a TC D-Two.)
20:
>the D-Two, and it definitely qualifies as a live-looper. 25:
delay, I proposed t.c. to include them in the 2290 and spent a 31:
released the D-Two, I contacted him again, saying that it had become 34:
So when the d-Two came out, I found it strange that they even made a
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
Your experience with Kim at TC sounds very familiar to me. I've had a 26:
a great deal of trouble getting MIDI information from TC, and in fact 50:
>delay, I proposed t.c. to include them in the 2290 and spent a 56:
>released the D-Two, I contacted him again, saying that it had become
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 22:
using a delay, actually, since the delay input stays open, except you can
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 30:
Echo Pro? Is it only delay time on the traditional delays that can lock to
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 20:
> >jammans, or use two of the new line 6 echo pros, or use two tc
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
RE: stereo delay 10:
Subject: RE: stereo delay 59:
>Subject: stereo delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 38:
> Echo Pro? Is it only delay time on the traditional delays that can lock
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
RE: stereo delay 10:
Subject: RE: stereo delay 31:
Subject: stereo delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200110/msg00850:Re: Affordable Soundscapes (and the Line 6 DL4)
19:
While it may not outdo the TC-stuff in bells n' whistles, or the BOSS 22:
getting lost in the land of rackmounts. Anyone else a fan of using two 26:
deeper delay hell. I need to figure out a stereo A/B/C switch-box setup to
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 23:
would allow you to have two 10 sec delays in parallel.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay (Line 6 sync) 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay (Line 6 sync) 27:
>- no "dialing in" of delay time in looper mode
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 19:
> i sold my two jammans to buy a repeater, but at the moment it's not
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
stereo delay 10:
Subject: stereo delay 20:
i sold my two jammans to buy a repeater, but at the moment it's not cutting
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 19:
>jammans, or use two of the new line 6 echo pros, or use two tc electronic
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: stereo delay 10:
Subject: Re: stereo delay 34:
> would allow you to have two 10 sec delays in parallel.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200110/msg00913:Re: Affordable Soundscapes (and the Line 6 DL4)
21:
For awhile I was able to do the same thing as you are (i.e. delay one 1 and 42:
> While it may not outdo the TC-stuff in bells n' whistles, or the BOSS 45:
> getting lost in the land of rackmounts. Anyone else a fan of using two 49:
> deeper delay hell. I need to figure out a stereo A/B/C switch-box setup
200111/msg00405:Re: kingcrimson in sf-no loop content...
24:
TC's and Eventide's (nearly wet my pants at the sight of it!) had a delay 25:
patch or two going. :-) 43:
LD t-shirt and said he saw two others who had told him they were all going
200201/msg00897:RE: good processor for weird sounds, etc.?
20:
I've owned Eventides, Lexicons, and tc gear, which are all certainly fun, 23:
delay I've ever used; factory patch #10--I never use its other patches but 29:
looping delay, mono-synth voices, the incomparable "intelligent" Ring Mod 40:
which has nice filters, step-phasers and pitch-shifting, but needs two Korg
263:
Re: EDP Delay+Mute Mode Request, February 18, 2002 264:
Re: EDP Delay+Mute Mode Request, February 18, 2002 406:
little OT: TC 2290 or D-Two?, February 18, 2002 543:
Re: EDP Delay+Mute Mode Request, February 19, 2002
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
little OT: TC 2290 or D-Two? 10:
Subject: little OT: TC 2290 or D-Two? 22:
compare the TC 2290 and the D-Two?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200202/msg00729:RS 10 ->Patchmate->Repeater->Echoplex
24:
of a Rocktron Patchmate to switch pedals in and out and a TC 2290 for 25:
delay. 33:
Patchmate Midi Thru/Out -> TC 2290 Midi In 34:
TC 2290 Midi Thru -> Repeater Midi in
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200202/msg00099:Re: Reverb: Bang for Buck (Was: Percussive Loopers)
21:
better than all the other software verbs in the test including TC- I was 23:
surprised at NAMM to find the similarly designed D-Two had no Exit key- 93:
> >just a weird delay with the outputs of the MPX100.
200203/msg00110:RE: MIDI Tempo based effect processor?
19:
TC Electronics Fireworx 36:
> after lugging two racks of gear down to Loopstock, I found 41:
> delay, flange
200203/msg00090:Re: MIDI Tempo based effect processor?
22:
well), perhaps the TC Fireworx is worthwhile checking into... maybe? It is 39:
> after lugging two racks of gear down to Loopstock, I found myself asking 41:
> basically hoping for is to replace my MO-FX (tempo based delay, flange
200203/msg00100:Re: MIDI Tempo based effect processor?
33:
> well), perhaps the TC Fireworx is worthwhile checking into... maybe? 51:
>> after lugging two racks of gear down to Loopstock, I found myself 55:
>> basically hoping for is to replace my MO-FX (tempo based delay, flange
39:
don't need. I don't want delay and modulation effects in front of 41:
stereo and the other two devices only have mono inputs), so it needs to 46:
I'd love to replace the GP-16 and the Vortex with something like a TC
200206/msg00396:Re: new looping/sequencer/fx rack finished.
49:
TC Electronics D-Two digital delay 50:
Ibanez AD202 analog delay (rear-panel I/O added) 56:
analog delay send HPF)
3:
Re: D-Two Looper Settings 10:
Subject: Re: D-Two Looper Settings 19:
Anthony, thanks for this info. From what I have read, the max delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200207/msg01176:Re: TC Electronic D-Two (was Re: D-Two Looper Settings)
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-Two (was Re: D-Two Looper Settings) 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-Two (was Re: D-Two Looper Settings) 20:
bypass occurs before the delay or after. It also lets you choose whether
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: D-Two Looper Settings 10:
Subject: Re: D-Two Looper Settings 23:
control, delay time, tap tempo, who knows?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200207/msg01362:RE: Of percussion, Repeaters, and MIDI clocks
27:
TC D Two - perfect 28:
TC FireworX - some slight clicks in delays sometimes 32:
Sony HR-GP5 - perfect (delay is only MIDI-synced effect)
109:
Re: D-Two Looper Settings, July 14, 2002 112:
Re: D-Two Looper Settings, July 15, 2002 113:
Re: CV or MIDI Expression-Controlled Delay Time?, July 06, 2002 133:
Re: D-Two Looper Settings, July 13, 2002
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: D-Two Looper Settings 10:
Subject: Re: D-Two Looper Settings 33:
Using these options does not effect the delay time.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: D-Two Looper Settings 10:
Subject: Re: D-Two Looper Settings 24:
But, there is a MIDI implementation guide on the TC website and pretty much
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200212/msg00194:Re: [looper's] midi-locked delays and stuff
26:
and an internal, pre-loop, tap delay. It allows for a lot more 36:
And...al of this is controlable "sans-midi" (via two three button 48:
TC 51:
delay-displaced rhythmic loops, and real-time rhythmic "morphing" of loops.
22:
tc-electronic g-major: it has a seamless-function, so a delay or reverb 23:
will not be cut off when you change to another sound. i take a delay with 25:
i change to another sound, the delay wants to ring out, but it can't (100% 31:
to stop it i found out two ways (with a feedback
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
47:
Delay Mode.., March 15, 2003 52:
RE: Delay Mode.., March 16, 2003 298:
No other radio playlist 3/03As broadcast on kpfa/kpfb Berkeley and kfcf Fresno and streamed as kpfa.org.the 'no other radio' program has brought independent/difficult music to northern California for over two decades, on the pacifica networkWe welcome all independent/unusual musicians and artists to send in their work.Contact; das@ubuibi.orgPlaylists are archived at http://ubuibi.org/uB-main.htmlUnder the 'radio' link.While there you can also find rotating n.o.r. Mp3's.This time featuring a visit with stimbox & xome (in no particular order)Jorge antunes savage songs pogusStephen millard Black window angry veganThe silverman requiem settings soleilmoonMarvin Pontiac greatest hits strange & beautifulPe unreleased reduktiv musikenCold electric fire sacred noise elasticinemaTroum tjukurrpa drones-core finger mark dronevance orchestra hot water music dronebad sector dolmen dronehideg ronics dronepara noise terminal fraktale droneultra milkmaids jain umpoulet dronev/a editions-zero #2 intrasitivev/a bricollage #1 illegal artv/a just a love song old europa caféhenry cow in praise of learning recommendedyasunao tone wounded manyo alkuvogelwurger primus arthuurvogelwurger secundus arthuur, March 20, 2003 385:
RE: delay time part ii, March 11, 2003
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200306/msg00588:Re: Frippertronics and soundscapes
40:
were selling the Electro-Harmonix 16 sec digital delay 46:
that he had two echoplexes at that time to do his 48:
replace them with TC 2290's. I don't remember what his
71:
OK, what's so cool? I'm into delay effects, so most of these examples are 72:
delay based: 74:
A 12-band filter, with a 2-sec. delay on each band, each with dedicated 86:
goes into a filter, a delay, and an overdrive.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
I started out using two Revoxes like Fripp and Eno. 23:
setting the delay time by how far the tape recorders 27:
Later I used two Electroharmonix 16 sec digital 28:
delays, two Hiwatt 100 stacks, and a pedalboard with a
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200306/msg00904:Re: Reaktor 4 as a guitar processor
104:
> OK, what's so cool? I'm into delay effects, so most of these examples are 105:
> delay based: 107:
> A 12-band filter, with a 2-sec. delay on each band, each with dedicated 122:
> goes into a filter, a delay, and an overdrive.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200307/msg00478:Re: (affordable) stereo (live) looping?
20:
sec of loop/delay time and a bunch of other features. The cool thing 32:
still get service though, though TC Electronics, as they were both part 55:
> I'd imagine that I could buy two EDP's and sync them, 59:
> easily buy two mono pedals like the ones from Akai or
110:
> > Alright, fine, you have to get two for stereo, but that also gives you 138:
$2000. Add in the TC-2290. delay only, $2000. Etc. I'm just illustrating 146:
>a TC G-force if it only did delays? 148:
People still spend $2000 for the 2290 delay. Admittedly that is a little
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200308/msg01000:Hello, my name is biz and I am gearaholic. It all started with a small pink footpedal my friend gave me for my birthday...
47:
laptops. Some people on this list surely remember when a 6 second delay box 238:
> Alright, fine, you have to get two for stereo, but that also gives you 255:
> TC finalizer: $2400 256:
> TC fireworx: $1760
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200308/msg01327:Re: Narrowing the field (Re: Currently available looper music webpage)
30:
T.C. Electronic 2290 Digital Delay 31:
DOD D12 - Dimension 12 Sampling Delay 35:
Line6 DL4 Modeling Delay 41:
TC Electronic D-Two Delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
the last time I saw Bob Fripp he had a stack of TC 2290 delays but, to my 23:
2290s but they might do the "instant playback" thingie, being digital delay 33:
ideas in mind, the 2290 being a full-blown digital delay line with all the 39:
both would do the same thing but at some points two roads will diverge to
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
248:
RE: Digitech X Delay and Kaoss MIDI in, October 24, 2003 492:
Re: TC Electronics D-Two, October 31, 2003 617:
Re: TC Electronics D-Two, October 31, 2003 629:
WOT: Looking for looper/digital artist/musician/cool person to join me in a cool two bedroom in SF, October 02, 2003
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
225:
Cheap stereo analog delay alert, November 24, 2003 335:
more for sale: tc electronics d-two, rolls line mixer, harmonizer, and more, November 04, 2003 376:
RE: begining EDP - Loop Delay on Loop did the trick ! Brilliant ! Thans A LOT Kim :-) <eom>, November 03, 2003 823:
TC Electronics/G Major Problem, November 30, 2003
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
I'd like to address the "two (or more) separate loopers" question: 24:
loop, which are: Repeater, Headrush, DL4, digitech RDS, Vortex and TC D 25:
Two. 32:
The D2 (which is basically a long (10sec.) delay) has some multitap,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200402/msg00235:FS: tc electronic d-two delay for sale + more
3:
FS: tc electronic d-two delay for sale + more 10:
Subject: FS: tc electronic d-two delay for sale + more 20:
tc electronic fireworx $800
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
150:
Re: How to match parameters on two EDPs, February 04, 2004 176:
Re: 16 second delay reissue a reality., February 13, 2004 188:
Re: 16 second delay reissue a reality., February 13, 2004 190:
Re: 16 second delay reissue a reality., February 13, 2004
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200403/msg00216:RE: need a digital delay that meets ridiculous requirements
3:
RE: need a digital delay that meets ridiculous requirements 10:
Subject: RE: need a digital delay that meets ridiculous requirements 20:
the TC Electronic D-TWO.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
tc 2290 series vs. parallel 10:
Subject: tc 2290 series vs. parallel 34:
interested in getting started. I recently purchased (2) TC 2290s both
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200410/msg00248:Interesting polyrhythms from MIDI synchable delays
22:
does this. I don't use a G2, but I do use a TC-Electronic G-Major, and it 26:
divisions on the GMaj to create interesting polyrhythms. With longer delay 27:
settings (whole note), the line between delay and loop gets blurred... 32:
I tried using the TC D2 to accomplish some of this, but it didn't sync as
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200410/msg00310:TC FireworX (was: mp3 of G2 & EDP)
3:
TC FireworX (was: mp3 of G2 & EDP) 10:
Subject: TC FireworX (was: mp3 of G2 & EDP) 21:
> On a similar note related to the G2, is anyone out there using the TC
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200410/msg00437:REPLEX (was: TC FireworX /G-force)
3:
REPLEX (was: TC FireworX /G-force) 10:
Subject: REPLEX (was: TC FireworX /G-force) 21:
>I have two Hughes and Kettner stomp boxes, the Replex and the Tube
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200410/msg00247:Re: Looping with the Echoplex with the Lexicon G2 slaved to its clock
20:
else does this. I don't use a G2, but I do use a TC-Electronic G-Major, 24:
polyrhythms. With longer delay settings (whole note), the line between 25:
delay and loop gets blurred... which is a good thing! 60:
>delay doubles its time) or when choosing a subcycle division on the EDP,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
RE: TC FireworX /G-force 10:
Subject: RE: TC FireworX /G-force 22:
I have two Hughes and Kettner stomp boxes, the Replex and the Tube
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200412/msg00478:Vortex Repair Success! Summary of my quest for tone altering effects
29:
Suggestions: Boss VF-1, Kurzweil Mangler, Roland VG-8, Evantide Eclipse, TC Electronic G-Force, TC Electronic D-2, TC Electronic G-Major, Boss GT-5, Lexicon Vortex, Lexicon LXP5, Alesis Ineko. 35:
- Boss SX-700 multi-effects processor (for delay, octave, and chorus) 39:
- Two EDPs (looping) 42:
I still have one space in my rack. I plan to get the Kurzweil Mangler, thanks to David Coffin's suggestion. It looks like a whopper for tone altering effects, but a little more expensive than the above two. I want to get a better unit for reverb too…not sure on that yet.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200502/msg00996:RE: Power of the Eventide Eclipse / Virtual Guitar Racks/Systems
27:
better....imagine an Eclipse, H6000, PMC-91, PMC-81, and TC Electronix 39:
Delay Module? And inside that, tons of parameters and flexibility, etc. 59:
What we need is a two-device rack: one device for infinite sonic 106:
> chorus, and delay. In short, I'd like to get the sounds I have now,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
45:
Ableton Live (I really like the filtered delay and the bit-reducer, for 48:
that fact prompted me to pick up a TC Electronics Powercore. That 51:
delay, and reverb -- to the Powercore, and save my CPU cycles for more 77:
into it (remember, the Chapman Stick has two outputs -- a bass side and a
183:
Re: Tom Delay loops himself, April 15, 2005 196:
Re: Boss DD-20 Upgraded to 46 Seconds of Delay!, April 22, 2005 198:
Delay formulas, April 22, 2005 204:
Boss DD-20 Upgraded to 46 Seconds of Delay!, April 21, 2005
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
25:
And also.. I have been looking at TC Electronic's D-Two for my delay
26:
>1-TC Electronic G-Force 27:
>4-TC Electronic D-Two Multi-Tap Delay
3:
TC Electronics: Old vs New. 10:
Subject: TC Electronics: Old vs New. 19:
I've been looking around at different delay units, new and old.. and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
If you use a volume pedal and a delay and loop what you create with that 42:
> > 1-TC Electronic G-Force 43:
> > 4-TC Electronic D-Two Multi-Tap Delay
24:
> 1-TC Electronic G-Force 25:
> 4-TC Electronic D-Two Multi-Tap Delay
24:
1-TC Electronic G-Force 25:
4-TC Electronic D-Two Multi-Tap Delay 49:
> > > new wave suit-wearing proto-indie-rock primitive tape delay fripp
21:
Subject: TC Electronics D-TWO 10-sec. delay
24:
Modulator with broken power supply, AMS reverb and delay, Klark Teknik DN 780... 26:
Marshall´s delay section was not affected). I was tempted to buy some Lexicon 63:
we have two dead pcm80s here, both with power supply & 77:
fwiw, we've had similar problems with some tc units (we use
38:
>Modulator with broken power supply, AMS reverb and delay, Klark Teknik DN 40:
>(luckily the Marshall´s delay section was not affected). I was tempted to 70:
> we have two dead pcm80s here, both with power supply & a>d problems. 89:
> fwiw, we've had similar problems with some tc units (we use dbmax on
200511/msg00530:Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
49:
> > It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try it 123:
> > Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 128:
> > TC Electronic 2290 Delay 131:
> > TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00588:Re: AW: New here and looking for a looping device
22:
pedals that do modulated delay are the 20/20 and the 2700. The other 33:
> The DD20 seems to be a fine tool, plus it offers several delay 42:
> of the other ones offers the other two options. Plus, the DL4 has also 43:
> some interesting delay algorithms (albeit with a short delay time
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200511/msg00529:RE: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
43:
> It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try it 115:
> Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 120:
> TC Electronic 2290 Delay 123:
> TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00542:Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
56:
>>It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try it 132:
>>Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 137:
>>TC Electronic 2290 Delay 140:
>>TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00546:yes, DFX Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
80:
> >>> It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try 157:
> >>> Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 162:
> >>> TC Electronic 2290 Delay 165:
> >>> TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00541:RE: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
40:
> It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try it 112:
> Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 117:
> TC Electronic 2290 Delay 120:
> TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00587:AW: New here and looking for a looping device
23:
The DD20 seems to be a fine tool, plus it offers several delay 29:
of the other ones offers the other two options. Plus, the DL4 has also 30:
some interesting delay algorithms (albeit with a short delay time of ~3s 31:
or half of it for the reverse delay). The Akai Headrush would also be in
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200511/msg00545:Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
74:
> >>It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try it 157:
> >>Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 162:
> >>TC Electronic 2290 Delay 165:
> >>TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00534:RE: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
19:
I have recently discovered some new tricks for the hold delay function on 20:
the Vox Tonelab floorboard. Because this is truly a hold delay, and not a 25:
the hold delay, there by allowing me to keep a simple loop going if I want, 34:
ambient pads. it is also cool for rhythmic stuff if you keep the delay time
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200511/msg00516:It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
28:
It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try it 99:
Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 104:
TC Electronic 2290 Delay 107:
TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00538:Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
53:
>>>It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try it 125:
>>>Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 130:
>>>TC Electronic 2290 Delay 133:
>>>TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00537:Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
23:
he would swell in a chord w/ a volped and that goes to a long delay(which 26:
dont know if what he is doing is really looping 'cause its in 'delay' 32:
> I have recently discovered some new tricks for the hold delay function on 33:
> the Vox Tonelab floorboard. Because this is truly a hold delay...
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200511/msg00558:Boomerang didn't come back, just kept flying Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
42:
> Boss Digital Delay pedal, and a volume pedal (going in reverse order 62:
> > he would swell in a chord w/ a volped and that goes to a long delay 66:
> > dont know if what he is doing is really looping 'cause its in 'delay' 72:
> >> I have recently discovered some new tricks for the hold delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200511/msg00544:Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
63:
>>> It's now two years later, and I figured it might be time to try 140:
>>> Electro Harmonix 16 Second Delay (new or reissue) 145:
>>> TC Electronic 2290 Delay 148:
>>> TC Electronic D-Two Delay
200511/msg00548:Re: It's that time again! 2005 Biennial Looper's Survey
25:
Boss Digital Delay pedal, and a volume pedal (going in reverse order 45:
> he would swell in a chord w/ a volped and that goes to a long delay 49:
> dont know if what he is doing is really looping 'cause its in 'delay' 55:
>> I have recently discovered some new tricks for the hold delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200511/msg00589:Re: AW: New here and looking for a looping device
25:
no feedback control, while the DD20 offers this in the delay mode. I 30:
For modulation duties, I got a TC Electronic G-Major few days ago, so I 31:
can apply pitchshifting and other effects to the loops. The D-Two is a 33:
need a delay that can add modulation.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: D-Two Delay 25:
(instantly muting the delay). The dry signal is passed as set with the mix
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200601/msg00459:Re: AW: LWL (looping with laptops) - multi-FX VST andcompressor/limiter VST
82:
it's not so applicable to pre-delay tracks when 88:
milliseconds of delay would "smear" the signal 97:
be used without a problem. Anything delay-based 99:
of admission alone, then the Chorus Delay and the
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: D-Two Delay 19:
Has anyone here used the TC Electronic D-Two delay in a live situation? It
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
RE: D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: RE: D-Two Delay 19:
If I recall correctly, I believe you can have it set to let the delay trail
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
RE: D-Two Delay 10:
Subject: RE: D-Two Delay 25:
>Subject: D-Two Delay Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:35:27 +0100
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
22:
> I have just bought FCB1010 midi-pedalboard, the Repeater, and a TC 23:
> 2290 delay. All this gear and midi are new to me. I hope to use the 24:
> FCB to controll the Repeater and the TC. 30:
> the repeater and the TC. I have read that this is possible on the
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
32:
However, the effects I us in my box, a TC FireworX, are just the 45:
- Pitch (harmonizer, dual or mono. Quadra achieved by linking two 50:
- Delay (many kinds - stereo, multi tap, often tempo synced)
26:
also has an insert for each of its two channels, Currently I run and EDP 28:
a TC electronics Model one for verb and delay with my Solstice as my 29:
acoustic gig rig, with one or two mackie SRM350's. This rig is highly
229:
Re: Two new DVD-R's from Doctor T., April 24, 2006 267:
Re: best way to split your guitar signal into two EDPs?, April 10, 2006 268:
Re: best way to split your guitar signal into two EDPs?, April 13, 2006 347:
Re: best way to split your guitar signal into two EDPs?, April 10, 2006
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200606/msg00760:RE: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
126:
> for delay, chorus, and 140:
> or TC Electronics 144:
> > I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 175:
> >> But a really good processor (or two) with some
200606/msg00631:Re: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
28:
My lexicon LXP1 and LXP5. The LXP1 is primarily for delay, chorus, and 37:
interesting sounds out of it. It's not an Eventide or TC Electronics 40:
I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 units as well.....need 65:
> But a really good processor (or two) with some new
200606/msg00823:Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81
19:
I'd like to get your thoughts on the Eventide Eclipse, TC Electronic 20:
Fireworx, TC Electrronics G-Force, and Lexicon PCM81. If I had to invest 25:
of effects, more than the other two from what I can tell, but I'd like to 28:
I'm looking for a unit, preferrable, that has all the standard delay,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
25:
to my musical schizophrenia. I used two Line 6 modellers for that bit of 41:
store I work at part time in Santa Cruz has two available, and are selling for 56:
but... I can buy an old LExicon JamMan on ebay. There's two that don't 79:
the parts, it LOOKS like you've been playing the guitar for a month or two.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200606/msg00829:Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81
35:
> I'd like to get your thoughts on the Eventide Eclipse, TC Electronic 36:
> Fireworx, TC Electrronics G-Force, and Lexicon PCM81. If I had to invest 41:
> of effects, more than the other two from what I can tell, but I'd like to 44:
> I'm looking for a unit, preferrable, that has all the standard delay,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200606/msg00832:Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81
18:
I’ve owned all of these. Each offers unique pleasures, to be sure, but the serious contenders for max mangling are only the Eventide and the FireworX, and I'd go for the Eventide without hesitating.My takes on each:PCM-81...a big disappointment as a mangler, even with all the add-on preset cards; opaque (but admittedly deep) interface, and really not a multi-effector; it’s a multi-delay--get the PSP software version and forget this one.G-Force...routing and modulation heaven with a great interface, always have 8 types of effect available in any possible order/config, but effects quite conventional; pitch-shifting nowhere near as cool as the Eventide. With clever, patient programming, it can do some wild morphing stuff because of the deep mod options and many simultaneous fx, not because of having unusual effects.FireworX...should have been a G-Force on steroids, since it’s packed with odd effects for sonic mayhem, but it's seriously crippled by low horsepower; even tho its got lots of modules to pick from, it’s impossible to load more than 2 or 3 without maxing the thing out. Same mod power and great interface as the G-F, but what's the point of infinite routing options if you've only got 2-3 effects going?? I sold my G-Force to get one and regretted it immediately. I hated pretty much all the presets and never found anything in it I loved exploring. I'm sure it would repay deep, committed investigation because of the weird effects available, esp. in concert with other devices. Too bad neither tc device will send its ultra mod power to external devices via MIDI control...The Eclipse will only disappoint if you’re expecting or used to the kind of endless programmability you’d get with a tc, or DSP-Eventide; it’s a two slot device with fixed algorithms, but these are rich and complex, covering all the basics in deluxe style, and filtered multi-delays exceptionally well...plus it’s got that multi-pitch-shifting thing that nothing else can quite duplicate. It sounds so magnificent you’d never regret having one, unless it only makes you yearn for an H8000. You’ve already got really cool ring-mod-ing and some rudimentary "synth-fx" with your VF-1s; actually, it seems that low-end hardware is where you’re most likely to find the richest collection of unique-if-cheesy fx, all of which would benefit enormously from an Eventide fairy-dusting down-stream. You already know my opinion of Reaktor as the weirdest and most endlessly re-thinkable multi-fx to beat, right? Too bad that's not working yet with the Receptor.....Have fun!dcOn Jun 24, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Krispen Hartung wrote:I'd like to get your thoughts on the Eventide Eclipse, TC Electronic Fireworx, TC Electrronics G-Force, and Lexicon PCM81.
200606/msg00748:RE: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
100:
> for delay, chorus, and 114:
> or TC Electronics 118:
> > I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 149:
> >> But a really good processor (or two) with some
22:
I can buy an old LExicon JamMan on ebay. There's two that don't appear to have the upgrades. 34:
I appreciate found music and mistakes. And I recorded Miles Davis once (with Jim Smith)... so I am deep into the glory of accidents with music. I love Eric Dolphy and Blind Willie Johnson, Charles Ives and Charlie Parker, Robert Johnson and Robert Dylan - it's a very long list. Actually, I try to not judge other's music really. It's not my business. I was just impressed with how INCREDIBLY simple my daughter wanted the guitar to be. Simple is very good. In some ways simple is much harder than complex. It's just, once you figure out the parts, it LOOKS like you've been playing the guitar for a month or two. But that's just ego and ego... well... 165:
for delay, chorus, and 179:
or TC Electronics
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200606/msg00730:RE: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
20:
boogie just for my> monday night traditional jazz gig. I'm thinking of gettting a Roland Cube> 30> because it is only 20 pounds and smaller, plus it has a lot of> effects...anybody have one?>> My lexicon LXP1 and LXP5. The LXP1 is primarily for delay, chorus, and> reverb. I had been using it for reverb...it really does have nice verb,> and> the chorus is lush as well. The LXP5 is more like a a multi-effects box.> It> is a bit challenging to program, however. If someone has the patience to> get> inside the menu tree, or uses the MIDIQuest software, then you can get> some> interesting sounds out of it. It's not an Eventide or TC Electronics> Fireworx by any means, but still a powerful little effects box.>> I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 units as well.....need> to> give that more thought, however, as I'm in love with 21:
those little red> boxes.> :)>> Kris>>>>> ----- Original Message -----> From: "tEd ® kiLLiAn" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:19 PM> Subject: Re: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp>>>> Kris,>>>> 'Tis a beaut indeed. But a tad rich for my meager means.>> I am mildly interested in your Lexicon half-space processors>> you mentioned on the list the other day however.>>>> Given I'm a Mac guy, the software isn't a factor for me.>> But a really good processor (or two) with some new>> creative potential sounds attractive.>>>> Anything more you care to say about them?>>>> Ted>>>>>> On Jun 20, 2006, at 8:46 PM, Krispen Hartung
200606/msg00843:Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81
55:
multi-effector; it’s a multi-delay--get the PSP software version and 74:
Too bad neither tc device will send its ultra mod power to external devices 78:
of endless programmability you’d get with a tc, or DSP-Eventide; it’s a two 108:
Eclipse, TC Electronic Fireworx, TC Electrronics G-Force, and Lexicon
200606/msg00846:Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81
76:
>> I'd like to get your thoughts on the Eventide Eclipse, TC Electronic 77:
>> Fireworx, TC Electrronics G-Force, and Lexicon PCM81. If I had to 82:
>> types of effects, more than the other two from what I can tell, but I'd 85:
>> I'm looking for a unit, preferrable, that has all the standard delay,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200606/msg00837:Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81
37:
> a multi-effector; it’s a multi-delay--get the PSP 74:
> devices. Too bad neither tc device will send its 80:
> kind of endless programmability you’d get with a tc, 82:
> it’s a two slot device with fixed algorithms, but
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200606/msg00761:Re: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
155:
>> for delay, chorus, and 169:
>> or TC Electronics 173:
>> > I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 204:
>> >> But a really good processor (or two) with some
200606/msg00704:Re: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
61:
> My lexicon LXP1 and LXP5. The LXP1 is primarily for delay, chorus, and 71:
> interesting sounds out of it. It's not an Eventide or TC Electronics 74:
> I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 units as well.....need 99:
>> But a really good processor (or two) with some new
200606/msg00841:Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81
49:
> I'd like to get your thoughts on the Eventide Eclipse, TC Electronic 50:
> Fireworx, TC Electrronics G-Force, and Lexicon PCM81. If I had to 53:
> a lot of different types of effects, more than the other two from what 56:
> I'm looking for a unit, preferrable, that has all the standard delay,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200606/msg00706:RE: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
70:
> My lexicon LXP1 and LXP5. The LXP1 is primarily for delay, chorus, and 79:
> interesting sounds out of it. It's not an Eventide or TC Electronics 82:
> I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 units as well.....need 107:
>> But a really good processor (or two) with some new
200606/msg00699:RE: FOR SALE: Mesa Boogie Mark I Combo Amp
40:
My lexicon LXP1 and LXP5. The LXP1 is primarily for delay, chorus, and 47:
interesting sounds out of it. It's not an Eventide or TC Electronics 50:
I'm actually considering selling my two Boss VF-1 units as well.....need to 74:
> But a really good processor (or two) with some new
200607/msg00628:Re: Vedr. Re: reverb just on the delays
23:
at 1:08 he brings up his two harmonizer channels . The left channel 44:
The most useful method will require a small mixer. Patch the delay 46:
aux which is pre-fader on the channel to which the delay is 48:
This way you can regulate the 'wetness' of the delay independant
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200607/msg00631:Vedr. Re: Vedr. Re: reverb just on the delays
18:
Any knowledge on how Hassell does this Live, and what gear he uses ? RFCharles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> skrev: "Open secret" starts with a very dry trumpet and at 1:08 he brings up his two harmonizer channels . The left channel tuned a minor third down (-3 semitones) and the right a fifth below (-7 semitones). At the end of his phrases we can hear a simply a long reverb set about 20dB below the trumpet level which creates that 'Hang" . There are no delays on this track. Marifaa Street, open secret ? Or any tune on M.Street. 19:
type="cite"> RF Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> skrev: If you could site a particular cut, I can tell you how to get theeffect nearly exactly.I suspect that you might be referring to "Malay" from Dream theory inMalaya (1981)The most useful method will require a small mixer. Patch the delayand the reverb into the mixer. Send a signal to the reverb from anaux which is pre-fader on the channel to which the delay is patched.This way you can regulate the 'wetness' of the delay independant ofthe delay level.>On some of Jon Hassells tunes, his trompetsound has a near and close>direct sound, and just a small amout of his sound (lets say 20%)>has a big reverb, I think. The part that has reverb, also has some>delay, I think. But there are no delay on the direct sound, I>think....>>I play 20:
guitar, with the use of TC 2290 for delay, and a Alesis for>reverb. The Alesis is in the fx-chain of the Tc.>>Any Thoughts of how to get "closer" to the Hassells sound, in the>manner of getting reverb just on the delays ? Or any tips what so>ever ?>>Best regards of Rune F>>>www.runefagereng.com>Mail:rune_fagereng@yahoo.no>Mob: 917 95 867--...http://www.zmix.net www.runefagereng.comMail:rune_fagereng@yahoo.noMob: 917 95 867 -- ...http://www.zmix.netwww.runefagereng.comMail:rune_fagereng@yahoo.noMob: 917 95 867
30:
second harmonizer in the same unit. And I tried merging two sources 35:
and delay blocks, but it sums into the signal chain after the harmony 37:
"space" as the vocals, and the reverb/delay is of the same quality 38:
you'd expect from TC Electronic. Excellent!
200607/msg00635:Re: Vedr. Re: Vedr. Re: reverb just on the delays
23:
digital delay with the pitch change cards in it and someone had rigged 52:
and at 1:08 he brings up his two harmonizer channels . The left 77:
The most useful method will require a small mixer. Patch the delay 79:
aux which is pre-fader on the channel to which the delay is
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200608/msg00456:Re: EXPLAIN your 10th Anniversary Birthday 30 second tune
84:
vocals, MadShifta, OhmBoyz Delay and Mobius? See my clip. 150:
delay patch, then into a Vortex, then (using the mixer) back into the 270:
through a Studio Projects tube mic pre, into a Yamaha four-track. Two 272:
are clean, two are fuzz (Effector13 TBD). I did a lot of pitch-shifting
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
28:
two, three meters distance). The Fireworx is no recognizable latency 32:
A final word on the TC Electronic FirewoX: 43:
late, creating a kind of slap delay effect.
200611/msg00085:Re: Bidule (was: MAX/msp question)
30:
my most beloved tc electronic fireworx patches in Bidule by chaining 37:
division of the global tempo. A typical example is a ping-pong delay 40:
these two "synced" postiion the delay length is changed continuously
18:
Per,I'm a little curious as to your rational for using Bidule as your host and Max/MSP to create your own plug-ins. It seems to me that Max/MSP does everything you need, so why bother having to learn two programs? Is Bidule that much faster to create a transitional set-up? (Just playing devil's advocate!!)Matt --- King Never http://www.kingnever.com On Nov 2, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Per Boysen wrote:On 2 nov 2006, at 16.16, paul wrote: audio switcher 8< 8< 8< aha, that's the trick. Thanks a lot! This means Bidule is now blinking all green for me. Feels good to know that you're not wasting time when beginning to learn a new application. I can now feel comfortable with the decision to keep MAX/Msp as my "audio plug-in manufactory" until my available computing power makes it possible to replace my pre-loop hardware with all laptop processing. I had to add one more step to that tutorial and insert a program change filter on the line between my midi input and the audio switcher so that I could operate mobius without inadvertantly changing my vst chains. Nice! I too discovered the pc filter bidule yesterday late night when reading the manual in bed on a laptop. This is great news to med because it means I can keep my FCB1010 pedal with the same MIDI PC bindings as I use with the hardware set-up (tc fireworX). And I can take my time to replace the twenty fireworX sound patches with software multi plug-in setups (eventually also new MAX patches) Once I had this all laid out I've only had to tweek it a bit but I've been very happy with the results. I generally only have 3 or 4 effects in a chain, but some of them already have multiple effects running as in guitar rig or freeamp2 and those are quite cpu intensive. I found the chain with classic eq followed by freeamp is using about 29% while the chain running classic eq, psp vintage warmer, classic chorus, classic delay is running at about 12%of course mobius is running all the time after these effects as all my chains are routed into a mixer module and then through mobius before going back into my audio card output. I also put chains of effect plug-ins first then through Mobius and then the Mobius master through a freeverb. I would like to wrap it up with a stereo compressor (Sonalkis, for a more musical mix and to be able balance the mix dynamically from the level of my live input in relation to the Mobius stuff)) but I had to sacrifice that to save up CPU cycles. Instead I still use my external hardware RNC (REally Nice Comporessor) as the last unit before the PA.I'm also having great fun with the SiR convolusion reverb VST plug-in! (tip for you that don't know about SiR). I like to keep it in the beginning, pre loop, and play though it as a performance effect. I have bought amazing convulotion impulses from http://spiritcanyonaudio.com. That's a cheap way to find unusual effect sounds to play with.Greetings from SwedenPer Boysenwww.boysen.se (Swedish)www.looproom.com (international)http://tinyurl.com/fauvm (podcast)http://www.myspace.com/looproom
200701/msg00373:RE: -How to rute signal (GR-30) guitar and guitarsynth-
65:
the 13-pin cable at all. This will mean two (or more, depending on your 91:
guitar-fuzz-wah-dist-delay-filter-then I split the 92:
signal two ways-signal 1 goes to-reverb-looper 93:
(repeater) - DI-PA and signal 2 goes to tc delay and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200701/msg00392:Re: -How to rute signal (GR-30) guitar and guitarsynth-
39:
> guitar-fuzz-wah-dist-delay-filter-then I split the 40:
> signal two ways-signal 1 goes to-reverb-looper 41:
> (repeater) - DI-PA and signal 2 goes to tc delay and 42:
> the onto two amps. My volumpedals works so I can
200701/msg00375:Re: -How to rute signal (GR-30) guitar and guitarsynth-
21:
> guitar-fuzz-wah-dist-delay-filter-then I split the 22:
> signal two ways-signal 1 goes to-reverb-looper 23:
> (repeater) - DI-PA and signal 2 goes to tc delay and 24:
> the onto two amps. My volumpedals works so I can play
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200701/msg00370:-How to rute signal (GR-30) guitar and guitarsynth-
23:
guitar-fuzz-wah-dist-delay-filter-then I split the 24:
signal two ways-signal 1 goes to-reverb-looper 25:
(repeater) - DI-PA and signal 2 goes to tc delay and 26:
the onto two amps. My volumpedals works so I can play
200702/msg00047:Re: Acoustic Guitar effects quest
18:
If you wanna save money, the Ensoniq DP4 does all this. I've seen them on Ebay for pretty cheap. Not selling mine right now. Haven't tried the pitch shift on guitar - no idea how it tracks. But I bet you could get one for a fraction of the TC Electronics G Force. I think I've seen them on EBay for a couple hundred US bucks. Cost me about 1200 US new! But I'm pretty sure it has all the features you want and I think it sounds good. 38:
It's wonderful. Fat, thick, sweet,,, a wee pinch of nasty if desired. Great tube echo. About 1100 USD. You can get a used old Echoplex Tape Echo but they're like buying an old car. You'll need to spend some $$$ to make it reliable if your'e gigging with it. But tape echo sounds very sweet compared to digital. I've seen old Echoplexes on Ebay for between 200-800 (high number for the old tube models) dollars. Would cost about 250 (or more if trashed) to make reliable. I'm doing that to my old one now so I can have TWO tape echos! Oooh weee!!! The solid state old Echoplexes still sound better than digital echo in my lowly and very humble old school opinion. I used mine on my acoustic and it sounds great. 60:
with tuer poly octave, boost, chorus, delay and reverb 77:
TC electronics G-force
200702/msg00559:Re: show me yours and i'll show you mine...
22:
> setup on the picture (above link) and replace Guitar Rig 2 with TC 32:
> How do you sync the TC FireworX with other gear? 41:
> Other question: what's the difference between the D-Two and 42:
> FireworX regarding delay's?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200702/msg00556:Re: show me yours and i'll show you mine...
20:
How do you sync the TC FireworX with other gear? Can it be used as a midi 22:
difference between the D-Two and FireworX regarding delay's? 28:
> setup on the picture (above link) and replace Guitar Rig 2 with TC
32:
digitech xdd delay, February 28, 2007 75:
Re: New live sampling/looping/delay effect, February 24, 2007 84:
Re: cheap two way switches, February 12, 2007 114:
looping or delay?, February 14, 2007
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200702/msg00557:Re: show me yours and i'll show you mine...
20:
How do you sync the TC FireworX with other gear? Can it be used as a midi 21:
clock master? Other question: what's the difference between the D-Two and 22:
FireworX regarding delay's? 28:
> setup on the picture (above link) and replace Guitar Rig 2 with TC
200702/msg00048:RE: Acoustic Guitar effects quest
66:
it tracks. But I bet you could get one for a fraction of the TC Electronics G 112:
reliable. I'm doing that to my old one now so I can have TWO tape echos! Oooh 142:
with tuer poly octave, boost, chorus, delay and reverb 159:
TC electronics G-force
33:
> Maybe a rear channel with a little delay added (reminiscent of the old 41:
describing, a rear channel with a little delay added, is indeed very 48:
idea was that the venue should provide at minimum two stereo PA 54:
behind. He was using an EDP, two repeaters and a TC Electronics
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
90:
RE: TC Electronic ND-1 Nova Delay, April 02, 2007 99:
Listen To The AM/FM Show In Less Than Two Hours From Now, April 21, 2007 255:
Re: TC Electronic ND-1 Nova Delay, April 02, 2007 297:
Re: Seeking: reverb/delay pedal w/ MIDI clock sync, April 13, 2007
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
25:
cool delay networks 30:
RS-443, MIDI-IN with 7-pin connector, two exp pedals) 41:
huge algorithms, but only two of them at any given time 49:
TC
30:
> cool delay networks 36:
> RS-443, MIDI-IN with 7-pin connector, two exp 51:
> huge algorithms, but only two of them at any given 61:
> computer with 2GB of RAM, TC
64:
The two Looping Racks can be used either individually, or as a single 80:
TC Helicon Voiceworks Pitch/Harmony Shifter 114:
Eowave Space Bug Delay
200708/msg00581:Re: Repeat something exactly twice, then stop
19:
TC D-Two can do this nicely. 24:
> I want to be able to play something and have it repeated after a delay of 25:
> about 15 seconds, then have it repeated again after a second delay of the 26:
> same length, then not have it repeated further. I want this delay to be
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200708/msg00583:Re: Repeat something exactly twice, then stop
19:
This is one of my top two requests for a future EDP software update. 21:
What you need is a long tapped delay (one that provides separate delay 23:
(the tc electronic boxes come to mind), but I believe they all max out 24:
at around 5.5 seconds of delay time.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200708/msg00657:Re: Repeat something exactly twice, then stop
28:
one of my top two requests for a future EDP software update.What you 29:
need is a long tapped delay (one that provides separate delaytime and 30:
feedback level for each repeat). There's several out there(the tc 32:
5.5 seconds of delay time.TH
200708/msg00671:Re: Repeat something exactly twice, then stop
24:
one of my top two requests for a future EDP software update.What you 25:
need is a long tapped delay (one that provides separate delaytime and 26:
feedback level for each repeat). There's several out there(the tc 28:
5.5 seconds of delay time.TH
200708/msg01075:Re: RME Firewire 800 and Guitar Amp Sim
114:
not available yet, VHT has a really cool two rack space model that is going 119:
makes the wonderful Trio, but that’s also two racks and has no cabinet 125:
What that guy can do with his hands, an amp and a bit of delay and reverb is 188:
the Formulate in combination with their 20/20 power amp, and two 1X12 Mesa
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200708/msg00958:Re: Looping and Latency (was Re: Laptop Looping)
32:
No. A while back, when I used a TC Electronix Fireworx as the first 34:
soundcard (going digitally from TC Electronix into sound card/ 35:
computer, so the AD latency happened in the TC). It worked out fine. 41:
However, now I have been forced to sell off that TC device and I now
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00521:Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00495:AW: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
AW: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: AW: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 20:
D-Two via SPDIF in the Fireworx's insert (having feedback set to 0) and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00655:Re: Looking for a pitch shifter pedal
22:
>use chorus and delay on my flute and want to get different 35:
Two thoughts, Ian: 46:
Next, at the other extreme, I use one of the TC Helicon Voiceworks
200711/msg00552:Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00497:Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 22:
> Thanks Per. The D-Two has a Chorus algorithms to create chorus and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
a unique kind of effect Not a food pedal but the TC Electronic D-TWO (rack mounted dedicated delay)has a chorus that can be applied to only the delay signal.Glenn-----Original Message-----From: Travis Hartnett [mailto:travishartnett@gmail.com]Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:26 AMTo: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.comSubject: Re: Help - looking for a unique kind of effectAre you looking for something that registers as actual pitch bending(significant bending), or just modulated delay repeats a la the MemoryMan Deluxe?On Nov 27, 2007 2:15 AM, <rs@moinlabs.de> wrote:> > Hi - perhaps you guys can help 20:
me?? I'm looking for a delay footpedal that> > can also bend pitch at the same time. That is, as the slaps happen, their> > picti is being altered up and down a little... as would happen with a> > chorus. I need at least 500ms of delay.
200711/msg00506:Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 21:
I mean with the DD-20 "analog" delay. BTw: I do have a DD-20 but I'm
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00657:Re: Looking for a pitch shifter pedal
36:
>>chorus and delay on my flute and want to get different possibilities of 50:
> Two thoughts, Ian: 64:
> Next, at the other extreme, I use one of the TC Helicon Voiceworks units
200711/msg00507:Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00550:Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 32:
mix, especially when playing a live band. Regarding the analog delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
282:
RE: two amp setups, November 10, 2007 413:
for sale DD-20 Giga Delay twin pedal, November 10, 2007 415:
for sale BOSS DD-20 Giga Delay Twin Pedal, November 10, 2007 433:
Re: Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?, November 13, 2007
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
19:
a unique kind of effect Not a food pedal but the TC Electronic D-TWO (rack mounted dedicated delay)has a chorus that can be applied to only the delay signal.Glenn-----Original Message-----From: Travis Hartnett [mailto:travishartnett@gmail.com]Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:26 AMTo: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.comSubject: Re: Help - looking for a unique kind of effectAre you looking for something that registers as actual pitch bending(significant bending), or just modulated delay repeats a la the MemoryMan Deluxe?On Nov 27, 2007 2:15 AM, <rs@moinlabs.de> wrote:> > Hi - perhaps you guys can help 20:
me?? I'm looking for a delay footpedal that> > can also bend pitch at the same time. That is, as the slaps happen, their> > picti is being altered up and down a little... as would happen with a> > chorus. I need at least 500ms of delay.
200711/msg00513:Re: Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 21:
more and a longer looper with a MIDI syncable delay within it. I use mine
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
68:
effectNot a food pedal but the TC Electronic D-TWO (rack mounted 69:
dedicated delay)has a chorus that can be applied to only the delay 78:
or just modulated delay repeats a la the MemoryMan Deluxe?On Nov 81:
Hi - perhaps you guys can help me?? I'm looking for a delay footpedal
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00486:Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 21:
> I'm trying to create an analog sounding delay patch. I'm missing
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
65:
effectNot a food pedal but the TC Electronic D-TWO (rack mounted 66:
dedicated delay)has a chorus that can be applied to only the delay 75:
just modulated delay repeats a la the MemoryMan Deluxe?On Nov 27, 78:
- perhaps you guys can help me?? I'm looking for a delay footpedal
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00493:Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 29:
Thanks Per. The D-Two has a Chorus algorithms to create chorus and
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00510:Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 25:
old delay and echo emulations like the DL4 and what i
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00483:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 19:
I'm trying to create an analog sounding delay patch. I'm missing the
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00859:RE: Help - looking for a unique kind of effect
19:
Not a food pedal but the TC Electronic D-TWO (rack mounted dedicated delay) 20:
has a chorus that can be applied to only the delay signal. 31:
(significant bending), or just modulated delay repeats a la the Memory 35:
> > Hi - perhaps you guys can help me?? I'm looking for a delay footpedal
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
44:
effectNot a food pedal but the TC Electronic D-TWO (rack mounted 45:
dedicated delay)has a chorus that can be applied to only the delay 54:
just modulated delay repeats a la the MemoryMan Deluxe?On Nov 27, 57:
- perhaps you guys can help me?? I'm looking for a delay footpedal
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200711/msg00551:Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay?
3:
Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 10:
Subject: Re:TC Electronic D-two: how to emulate an analog delay? 31:
looking for delay's with filter and modulation parameters to create
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200712/msg00456:RE: TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE
3:
RE: TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE 10:
Subject: RE: TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE 90:
Subject: TC Electronics G Sharp,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200712/msg00845:Re: WHAT DON'T YOU LIKE ABOUT YOUR LOOPERS
19:
I have both a DL-4 and a Delay Pro and I essentially don't use them. 22:
delay models. The Delay Pro would probably be in my main rack taking 76:
Mixer feeds to two EDPs. One used for the base loop and sending clock 81:
then went through a TC M300 reverb unit (with a digital feed to the
200712/msg00448:Re: TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE
3:
Re: TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE 10:
Subject: Re: TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE 62:
> tap tempo delay
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200712/msg00446:TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE
3:
TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE 10:
Subject: TC Electronics G Sharp, and LESSISMORE 34:
couple of flavors of overdrive, sparing use of compression, tap tempo delay (preferably
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200801/msg00374:Live Looping signal side chain - the most simple looping setup
32:
instead of blending two turntables it applies the rhythm of one track 46:
opening Overdub in a looper or reducing Feedback in a looping delay 47:
unit. I made lots of such patches in my TC Electronics Fireworks that
200804/msg00268:Re: Reverse Delays - how do they work?
29:
If talking pure audio effect reversed delay I'm using that as well. 30:
One particularly cool patch is one I made in the TC Fireworx I 39:
use two such processes in parallel and with inverted quantize periods
200804/msg00267:Reverse Delays - how do they work?
23:
DL4, the TC Electronics D2, the Boss DD20 and the EH SMM w/ Hazari). 29:
In a normal delay, it's rather simple: taking feedback aside for one 31:
and assuming an ideal delay (i.e. what goes in does come out sometime 39:
This approach will not work if we want a reverse delay, because the things
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200804/msg00278:Re: Reverse Delays - how do they work?
26:
The regular reverse delay on the SMM( as you will have noticed) has some 28:
of a trigger combined with the programmable delay length, but I didn't 36:
Most obvious implementation would be a kind of ducking delay, which waits 49:
> DL4, the TC Electronics D2, the Boss DD20 and the EH SMM w/ Hazari).
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
200901/msg01101:Re: Frustrated RC-50 user trying to gain bearings with Ableton Live
39:
loops and delay fx and whatnot in Ableton. My RC-50 was always the 72:
I'm not sure how much it matters for this, but I have two setups; 1) 75:
my bigger setup is all of the above plus a Roland VG-99, TC VoiceLive, 78:
I want to be able to do 'one man shows' where I use one or two pages
21:
yes, it's still that FireworX you discovered, next to the other two TC 37:
FireworX was one of the few devices which could sync a delay to it
200905/msg00851:Re: thinking about moving from rack to laptop...advice please!
24:
> tc g-force 28:
> tc d2 delay 71:
running my two loopers. 77:
the computer for some help. I control all of the above with two
200905/msg00891:Re: thinking about moving from rack to laptop...advice please!
23:
I replaced my two edps and my switchblade, that was the heart of my 31:
my main precessing boxes ( Eventide H8000, TC fireworx and Boss VF1). 42:
through an accelerator vst engine ( like tc powercore or else). 44:
plugins bu the native ones ( Tc, Uad etc.).
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
51:
>all loopers and fx they would drift apart. No two clocks are the same. 66:
>I never use it in looper mode. I use it in delay mode. Up to 23 sec of 67:
>stereo delay is a great looper for me. There is a way to double that time 71:
I use my SMMH and TC Nova Delay (in stereo) for most of my delay needs,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
18:
Actually no, I have no motivation to go the lap top route, at this time. I've seen to many loopfest participants scramble to cobble together hardware because their computer rig died on them. no matter what folks said about the ratio of hardware to software failure, unless I were to buy duplicate lap tops which is not in my budget right now. I'm simply pairing down my hardware options. I realized that I have more than enough choices with the LP-1, and a good DSP and a good preamp. I'm using a TC fireworx which has plenty enough effects options to keep me happy and an ethos preamp which is replacing my heavier Boogie formula preamp. That and my midi controller a few expression pedals, and I'm ready for action. The idea of creating scripts is interesting to me, and at the same time because so much of what I do is in the moment and improvisational. I'm not sure I want to spend many hours creating recording scripts if I'm not sure the music is going to unfold in the way i scripted it. I'm sure I'll get over this bias eventually, and if I was scripting for songs that had definite arrangements it would make sense for me. I to am pairing down for travel but it will be a while before the lap top is part of my rig. What are your issues with the LP-1 as far as quantize is concerned. Are you talking about first loop quantizing? The way I have been using Quantize replace is to create a short blank loop and then start adding content one note at a time using quantize replace set to 1/16th. i have a preset that duplicates the quantize replace function so that the preset switch acts as a sus command, i only have to hit the preset once and it will open and close capturing the notes are chords I just played. I'm able to create percolating sequencer style parts that emerge from a non rhythmic beginning. I'm not sure if I'm articulating that right but I'll post some Youtube examples in the next few weeks. One thing I learned from my last trip to Europe was that pairing down gear gave me fewer options, and yet having fewer choices meant that I was forced to be more musical and less reliant on effects. It was really liberating even though I missed all of the options, to not be over thinking and over using the DSP. BillOn Jan 4, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Simeon Harris wrote:hi bill. it's the desire for a smaller, lighter, more powerful setup that's motivating the change. i can ditch 6 rack spaces (mixer, lp-1, lexicon mpx-1, tc-d2, repeater) about 30 cables and several kilos in weight. i'll have a 2u rack case with a tc g-force and eclipse in it, with the laptop on top. i'll probably get an apogee duet and two small powered monitors. a pedal case on the floor and one on a stand and i'll be rockin. just did some recording with my ambient band (Zillo) and the gear issue was a nightmare! i do have issues with the lp-1 (quantisation etc), but it's a great piece of kit and i'm happy to support bob in any way that i can. however - i'm looking forward to scripting with mobius, because i want to be able to do stuff with my loops, which i'm currently having to do (on a basic level) by sending midi notes to the lp-1 from my old drum machine (more cables, power supplies and hassle!). quantize replace is great - especially if you run the lp-1 through some sort of delay line which is tempo synced (via the lp-1 midi clock) - you can get some really interesting stuff going onso are you thinking of making the switch too (i've just seen dennis moser make a post on facebook about exactly the same thing!) simOn Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:44 AM, William Walker <billwalker@baymoon.com> wrote: Hi Simeon i've been following your post and i was wondering if it was problems with the Looperlative or just the desire for smaller, lighter, more powerful, that is motivating your move to lap top? It occurred to me that you have been very active on the looperlative site, where I must say with a certain amount of guilt that I have not . I've spent countless hours as I'm sure you have finding new ways to control the Lp-1, but unlike you I haven't made the effort to post to the LP-1 forum. Lately I've been having a blast with quantize replace which, never having been an EDP user, is somewhat of a revelation for me. I'd be interested to know your thoughts if you have a free moment. Thanks Bill
201002/msg00461:Re: Accidental findings regarding Eventide Eclipse (and guess what?news on the varispeed front!)
24:
It's interesting to compare those two, which were released about at the 43:
I guess the best starting point is the factory preset #96 "TC Walrus 45:
except for the delay, and then have a look at the "mod" section.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
33:
Duncan twin tube classic with two power supplies and manual, an 34:
excellent sounding versatile two channel real tube overdrive/ 39:
amazing sounding flexible multi effects that are a delay freak/ effect 55:
TC Electronics G-minor with power supply small foot print midi foot
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
110:
Re: In search for a (cheap, but as long as possible) delay with varispeedpedal,, February 08, 2010 112:
Re: In search for a (cheap, but as long as possible) delay with varispeedpedal - update, February 08, 2010 114:
Re: Can two EDP's do this? How?, February 01, 2010 115:
Re: Can two EDP's do this? How?, February 01, 2010
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201002/msg00143:Re: OT Which Desert Island Stomp Box
18:
Rainer sprach:"The value of your time (and this includes your spare time) increases as your earnings increase. If you're making $5 an hour, then a three-hour trip to the music store costs you $15. If you're making §400/hour to fill your fat wallet, then that same trip suddenly costs you $1200 (and if you're not earning money at all and plundering the welfare system, like the relative majority of people in Germany, then it costs you nothing, but you would most probably not go anyway because you're too lazy, but I digress).The solution for this? Hire somebody who has more expertise than you (so he might find those pedals in only 1.5h) and/or makes less money (so he will be happy if you pay him $50 per hour), try to explain to him what you're looking for, and suddenly you've saved yourself $1125. It's called "consulting".I would tend to agree with that point and I know just the guy.....ME!!!!:-) This is really wide open territory obviously and I would want more details, must they all be battery op? or will his desert island include a solar panel array or wind turbine? also by limiting his size of pedals he really is limiting himself from a whole world of great boxes with a bigger footprint from Eventide, line 6 , etc.. that said here goes..*DISTORTION/FUZZOVERDRIVE/FEEDBACK/SUSTAIN:*sounds like the Zendrive would be too tame, I'd suggest, if money is no object, the Tone Candy Red Hot which is more of a true distortion box, but if he want's a great overdrive the Tone Candy sweet drive is like the Zendrive with slightly better low end. Both are more easy to obtain than a Zendrive as they are available in stores like Union grove Music. Any of the Keeley modded boss pedals are worth checking out, I had a modded Blues driver which was good but I here the modded DS-1's are better and maybe more what he's after distortion-wise.*CHORUS*TC chorus flanger kill two birds with one stone , no battery option though, has its own power cable. Boss CE-2 *FLANGER*see above or MXR micro flanger*PHASER*mxr phase 90*COMPRESSOR*That would be the keeley but I'm also enamored of the pigtronix philosophers tone and the carl martin comp/limiter which has its own ac chord as well*DIGITAL DELAY*Boss DD-7 is hard to beat for features and compact size, can use an expression pedal to control parameters, has tap tempo, lots of delay time. and a nice analog sim. New digitech hardwire delay is also nice as is the TC nova delay*ANALOGUE DELAY*MXR carbon copy ,velly velly nice. Wage huge aqua pussy also nice but larger box shorter delay times*PITCH SHIFTER*Boss P-5 Intelli-shifter, about the only small intelligent pitch shifter going, the micro POG is great for parallel harmonies and non diatonic stuff.*TREMELOFulltone tremolo is very nice with a half/full speed switch. Boss trem is decent*WAH WAH* fulltone, buddah, RMC, The new Vox satriani is excellent , several from dunlop like the Bradshaw designed CAE wah and a gajillion artist models., too many to choose from, I'm a bit over wah wah myselfBill
201002/msg00874:AW: OT Pre-spring cleaning gear sale
46:
> Duncan twin tube classic with two power supplies and 47:
> manual, an excellent sounding versatile two channel 54:
> that are a delay freak/ effect tweaker/ loopers wet dream. I 71:
> TC Electronics G-minor with power supply small foot print
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201003/msg00184:Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP!
3:
Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 10:
Subject: Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 27:
quarter note triplet up to a sixteenth note. This "delay time
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201003/msg00197:Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP!
3:
Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 10:
Subject: Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 23:
factory preset Fireworlds, using a synced two tap delay set to 1/2
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201003/msg00277:Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP!
3:
Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 10:
Subject: Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 18:
Mark sprach:Isnt that Fireworlds (of which Bill spoke) patch a bit EclipsishPer sprach:Yes, I definitely agree to that! I do remember that preset, aharmonizer set to a fourth or a fifth up with a feedback loop thatmakes sound climb upwards with each loop. I overdosed this in theeighties and that sound still gives me unpleasant flashbacks. Yuk.;-))Funny Per, I feel that way about most envelope followers and filters, though I've been getting in to formant filters as of late. I do occasionally use a triggered wah sound,though its eq'd really dark with very little opening of the filter. That funky wow wow sound reminds me of the 70's and 80's and not in a good way, in a bad haircut band with silly name kind of way, and I play in a funk band on a regular basis!!. I don't even own a wah pedal right now though I'm looking for one that has really wide sweep, doesn't add gain and distortion and responds more like a clean synth filter. I might have to break down and buy a moog filter with an expression port instead. I understand what you are saying though as both that string patch effect that the space station is famous for and the whammy effect have been done to death. However someone can always come along and do something fresh with these effects. I've modified this patch so much that it doesn't resemble the original Fireworlds patch much at all. actually I have three patches with variations, As i mentioned before I sync both the two pitch shifts and the tap delay (which has been edited from 6 taps to two taps simply by turning down they other taps), to the clock from my Looperlative. I like using 1/4 note against dotted 1/8 ths and 1/2 notes against dotted 1/4 notes depending on the length of my first loop which determines the tempo sent to the Fireworx. I like octaves, up an octave and down and octave at the same time, the best. And I turn the regeneration of the pitch shifts way down so I avoid that rising or lowering cascading pitch effect. I like fading the effect in with the expression pedal after I've hit a note or chord and use quantize replace to capture predetermined subdivisions of the loop. It allows me to create sequencer style percolating parts that because of the octave up and down pitch combination it sounds very close to an organ timbre. actually better to my ears and more fresh than any guitar synth organ patch I was ever able to use. I have at least 5 or 6 parameters being continuously controlled by the one ex pedal so in toe down position I have only the reverb on, at half way I bring in the delay and at toe down position the pitch effect comes in, the reverb mix increases slightly and both the delay's regeneration and the reverb's decay time increase subtley. This is a far cry from the effect of which you speak, more organic sounding than parallel 4ths and 5ths and more useable, though I do occasionally use those intervals but in poly rhythmic way with-ought any regeneration. It can really make one guitar sound like its doing the work of two or three if you lock in right. I also like using 9ths, or 5th up and 4th down bouncing from one interval to they other.Bill
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201003/msg00185:Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP!
3:
Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 10:
Subject: Re: Im bored of my TC Fireworx! HELP! 20:
Im a bit interested HOW you did this changing the delay timing thing Per.. but I guess its difficult to remember when you dont have it now?Just recently Ive been playing.. hard.. into the loopers with only distortion.. and all the airy fairyness of shimmering reverbs and bouncing stereo delays seems a bit well.. old person.. and I guess Im going thru that mid life thing... just UNloaded Eno form the iPhone and put the Pistols on...
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
21:
hey thanks, this is all very helpful. love the reggae music... great videomy macbook pro was stolen two weeks ago so I am still very frustrated... since now I see how much easier things were when I still had it...!actually I do want to still record midi and audio from the mic on live. i have songs with lots of midi tracks playing simultaneously. it doesnt seem possible.thanks, any more info is appreciated... looking into this stillbestnadia 37:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:18 PM, TR <tomrollison@yahoo.com> wrote: > > I was running it on a Gateway with 2 gigs of Ram and a 1.8 Ghz dual core processor. Seems that this particular machine could either run virtual instruments OR record/playback but not both. > I should add that I was running mics in through an TC Electronic audio interface as > well as my guitar. My hope is to be able to do realtime remixing and dubbing and looping. > I honestly don't think there is a laptop (let alone a notebook) with the resources to pull this all off. 38:
I have to agree to that. But only if you mean it in the sense of how you would do "looping, dubbing and remixing" by using the traditional tools like a mixing console, various audio sources for input and various external effect processors routed in effect send loops around the console. Some years ago I tried to achieve that "in the box" by MIDI clock syncing two laptops and piping audio between them digitally (SPDIF and optical ADAT). But it still wasn't enough processing power and I don't see any modern laptops that provide the power needed. So what to do then? The solution is to simplify your setup to bring down the burden of the CPU. This pretty much disqualifies Ableton Live because it is designed to meet the remix concept where all options are instantly accessible. But you can still use Live though, if you restrict the numbers of effects active within the session. Think about what exactly you need to do in your performance and set up Live only for that. You will have to sacrifice the freedom to be able to do whatever comes to mind with your audio, but since only you know what you are excluding from your performance it won't be an issue for the audience. One typical example of this minimize-CPU-load strategy is to use the same dub delay circuit for all channels and send audio there by channel send knobs. The simple Ping-Pong delay in Live is very CPU efficient and it can sound pretty cool if placed with "feedback = 0" in a effect Return Track loop that is using its effect send knob to send signal back into itself. After the Ping Pong you may put a limiter or compressor. That's it as for CPU taxing. The rest is usual control strategies like assigning some knobs or sticks to sweep the Ping-Pong's filter range and its tempo division. And you may add a button for its Freeze loop function. Another example of "low CPU cost" techniques in Ableton Live that may sound very advanced is to utilize MIDI Clips for control data targeting any plug-in parameter. Now, you may be thinking that it is not always possible to send MIDI directly to a track or a track's plug-in from a MIDI Track, but there is a workaround for that! Send MIDI through the computers operating system! If using OS X there is the built-in IAC Bus system and for Windows XP I remember I was using the third-party hack MIDI Yoke. Not sure how to go here if you are using Vista or W7, but regard this a lead and look into it!http://www.midiox.com/ Myself I have chosen a different solution; to not add effects to tracks. Instead I add effects PRE looping and create loops where different effect treatments are recorded with the source sound. This might seem to restrict your options, and it actually does in a technically theoretical way. But as I see it it increases my expressive options when performing. For example, a command to cut and mutilate a loop will not only change the source sound but all effects as well - and this does give more "listener experienced" power under your fingertips. Ableton Live is designed to offer many options in parallel and I stopped using Live and went with the free software Plogue Bidule (it has a price tag today, but still low for what you get) where I could build a system that lets me use an almost infinite number of effect processor chains for my source audio input. Later on the software Mainstage was launched by Apple and since I found it to be a replica of my Bidule setup replaced my old pc with one from Apple that could run both the Windows XP Bidule rig and a Mainstage rig according to the same functionality and performance strategies.
43:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:18 PM, TR <tomrollison@yahoo.com> wrote:>> I was running it on a Gateway with 2 gigs of Ram and a 1.8 Ghz dual core processor. Seems that this particular machine could either run virtual instruments OR record/playback but not both.> I should add that I was running mics in through an TC Electronic audio interface as> well as my guitar. My hope is to be able to do realtime remixing and dubbing and looping.> I honestly don't think there is a laptop (let alone a notebook) with the resources to pull this all off.I have to agree to that. But only if you mean it in the sense of howyou would do "looping, dubbing and remixing" by using the traditionaltools like a mixing console, various audio sources for 44:
input andvarious external effect processors routed in effect send loops aroundthe console. Some years ago I tried to achieve that "in the box" byMIDI clock syncing two laptops and piping audio between them digitally(SPDIF and optical ADAT). But it still wasn't enough processing powerand I don't see any modern laptops that provide the power needed.So what to do then? The solution is to simplify your setup to bringdown the burden of the CPU. This pretty much disqualifies Ableton Livebecause it is designed to meet the remix concept where all options areinstantly accessible. But you can still use Live though, if yourestrict the numbers of effects active within the session. Think aboutwhat exactly you need to do in your performance and set up Live onlyfor that. You will have to sacrifice the freedom to be able to dowhatever comes to mind with your audio, but since only you know whatyou are excluding 45:
from your performance it won't be an issue for theaudience.One typical example of this minimize-CPU-load strategy is to use thesame dub delay circuit for all channels and send audio there bychannel send knobs. The simple Ping-Pong delay in Live is very CPUefficient and it can sound pretty cool if placed with "feedback = 0"in a effect Return Track loop that is using its effect send knob tosend signal back into itself. After the Ping Pong you may put alimiter or compressor. That's it as for CPU taxing. The rest is usualcontrol strategies like assigning some knobs or sticks to sweep thePing-Pong's filter range and its tempo division. And you may add abutton for its Freeze loop function.Another example of "low CPU cost" techniques in Ableton Live that maysound very advanced is to utilize MIDI Clips for control datatargeting any plug-in parameter. Now, you may be thinking that it isnot
18:
Hey y'all, I was working in the studio yesterday and recorded this acoustic lap steel improv. I had neglected to start rolling video until i had built a few tracks up, so rather than be the usual build from scratch it starts about two minutes in. The track also features both pre and post loop delay and delayed pitch shift tracks, notably the TC fireworx acting as the post looper effects with an expression pedal controlling effects mix and the same polyrhythmic delay setting on both the Fireworx and my pre loop delays from the M-9, both processors are synchronized to the LP-1's first loop. more details of what I used are in the tag line.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqZgh7NxNMQ Enjoy and feel free to subscribe to my Youtube site Thanks Bill
37:
usual build from scratch it starts about two minutes in. The track also 38:
features both pre and post loop delay and delayed pitch shift tracks, 39:
notably the TC fireworx acting as the post looper effects with an expression 40:
pedal controlling effects mix and the same polyrhythmic delay
24:
Hey y'all, I was working in the studio yesterday and recorded this acoustic lap steel improv. I had neglected to start rolling video until i had built a few tracks up, so rather than be the usual build from scratch it starts about two minutes in. The track also features both pre and post loop delay and delayed pitch shift tracks, notably the TC fireworx acting as the post looper effects with an expression pedal controlling effects mix and the same polyrhythmic delay setting on both the Fireworx and my pre loop delays from the M-9, both processors are synchronized to the LP-1's first loop. more details of what I used are in the tag line.
28:
> from scratch it starts about two minutes in. The track also features 29:
> both pre and post loop delay and delayed pitch shift tracks, 30:
> notably the TC fireworx acting as the post looper effects with an 32:
> delay setting on both the Fireworx and my pre loop delays from the
201011/msg00535:Guitar Stuff for sale (was Re: Compressor-Sustain Pedal Advice)
45:
* TC 47:
size="-1" color="#000000"> aka TC Sustainer... rare rare rare and 51:
Harmonix 16 second delay 104:
TC Sustain+ is near the bottom of the list:
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201012/msg01127:RE: The EDP and the Looperlative and me
60:
color:#1F497D'>I also use the Novation to control two TC M300’s in my 128:
a paltry two weeks? What the fuck can one hope to possibly understand 129:
about a machine this sophisticated in two weeks?????? perhaps enough to realize 197:
basically just work with a long synchronized delay, but I'd like to be able to
201101/msg01016:Re: Introductin & naive questions
50:
> didn't have that in the initial release) and anything that is a delay 52:
> as a looper (so the Boss DD20 in delay mode can do it). 63:
> a new loop and discard the old one. So I'm gonna split this in two parts 66:
> Things that can do it: EDP (configurable), DD20 (in delay mode - well,
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201101/msg01001:Re: Introductin & naive questions
29:
that is a delay used as a looper (so the Boss DD20 in delay mode can do 40:
two parts ("keep" and "replace"): 42:
Things that can do it: EDP (configurable), DD20 (in delay mode - well, 48:
Things that can do it: EDP, DD20 (in delay mode - well, sort of).
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: Ping Pong delay on Fireworx 10:
Subject: Re: Ping Pong delay on Fireworx 18:
ahh sorry - i assumed the delay blocks were the same as in the tc g-force. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM, mark francombe <mark@markfrancombe.com> wrote:
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201105/msg00460:Spring is here and so is the cleaning
26:
feature on this unit would take the place of the volume swell+ delay 33:
trusty keeley two knobber, which leads us to the next item. 46:
a TC Electronic Nova reverb, this is one of the best pedal verbs on 48:
gone back to using a rack mount TC G-sharp, or Fireworx ( yes i
18:
It might take you a bit of fiddling to get the hang of it but once you do you will be VERY happy. You might not be at first because it's not plug and play. It's not real hard, just takes a bit to find the sweet spot for different instruments. But... that sweet spot is SO SWEET!There are a lot of options on it which can be daunting. But they're quite powerful. I think it's one guy in a garage. Similar to AnalogMan. For my money, Ethos is more usable than my fully tweaked sunface AnalogMan King Of Tone... and both were expensive. Both can impose long wait times. I would imagine one man (or very small) outfits like Rob and AnalogMan lose business due to the wait time. If you have a big gig or record coming up they will, when possible, move you to the front of the line.Happy motoring!Richard SalesSent from my IPadwww.glasswing.comOn Jun 19, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Phil Clevenger <phil.clevenger@gmail.com> wrote:Email from custom tones this morning (thanks to WIlliam Walker's endoresment ;) ---"We will contact you when your Ethos is ready--the estimated ship date is May-July 2013."Heehee... Maybe it's one guy in a garage, but it's also epic mythmaking - love it :) The upside is that by July 2013 I should have nickels enough set aside to pay for it :)Phil :)On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:47 AM, William Walker wrote: Too bad I don't get a kick back from Custom Tones for all of the recommending of the Ethos pedal I do. Well thats not entirely true, he did do me a solid by getting me one quickly in time for the NAMM show two years ago. I believe its at least a year wait on those right now, maybe two. But i second Richards remarks, best $400 I ever spent, on a stomp box, as it really is a complete two channel preamp. Mark Hamburg brought up the point of there being no way to check from one effects block to the next if there is internal clipping on the M series stuff and I would venture to believe this is a common problem in most multi effects of this type, particularly if you are doing like Mark is doing ( and myself for that matter) which is running gain and distortion pedals at the front of your change. Add to that highly dynamic effects like filters and its easy to get clipping without seeing where it is coming from. I would imagine running a keyboard which has an even more powerful output signal than most guitars, would be even more susceptible to this kind of clipping. This may be a function of cheaper A/D converters but even my timefactor which I believe has superior headroom and A/D converters (at least it sounds that way to me) can start to self clip if you push the feedback to self oscillation. What I've noticed about the M-5 is because its only one effect at a time it seems less likely to self clip. I think many of us have gotten in to the effects Jambalaya mode of sound creation where we create our sounds out of increasingly complex combinations of effects. Nothing wrong with this for sure but its also really valid to strip back ones choices, from time to time and often times the leaner sounds work best, and provide contrast with the more complex combinations. My current loop rig goes like this, keeley compressor, ethos preamp, Line 6 M-5, Eventide time factor, Dtar preamp, Tc fireworx, or g sharp or nova reverb running in the Dtars insets and looperlative running in the Dtar's effects loop. I can either leave the rig in mono, or use both individual xlr outs from the Dtar and run the Looperlatives outputs separately to there own channel strips for a big stereo spread. This rig gives me flexibility for both acoustic and electric guitars, and to move from electric to acoustic is simply a matter of bypassing the ethos. Though I have a lot of choices usually its just some kind of delay a bit of verb, compression , and different flavors of clean and dirty. The M-5 is there for specialty effects and anything else beyond my basic food group needs, I have a lot of choices , but not so many as to be a distraction.Bill
21:
two years ago. I believe its at least a year wait on those right now, 22:
maybe two. But i second Richards remarks, best $400 I ever spent, on 23:
a stomp box, as it really is a complete two channel preamp. Mark 45:
ethos preamp, Line 6 M-5, Eventide time factor, Dtar preamp, Tc
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
38:
a TC electronic Nova Reverb, another casualty of my overcrowded 42:
a TC electronic G sharp rack mount proccessor , two effects at a 43:
time either some kind of modulation, or delay, and reverb, lots of
18:
Email from custom tones this morning (thanks to WIlliam Walker's endoresment ;) ---"We will contact you when your Ethos is ready--the estimated ship date is May-July 2013."Heehee... Maybe it's one guy in a garage, but it's also epic mythmaking - love it :) The upside is that by July 2013 I should have nickels enough set aside to pay for it :)Phil :)On Jun 19, 2011, at 10:47 AM, William Walker wrote: Too bad I don't get a kick back from Custom Tones for all of the recommending of the Ethos pedal I do. Well thats not entirely true, he did do me a solid by getting me one quickly in time for the NAMM show two years ago. I believe its at least a year wait on those right now, maybe two. But i second Richards remarks, best $400 I ever spent, on a stomp box, as it really is a complete two channel preamp. Mark Hamburg brought up the point of there being no way to check from one effects block to the next if there is internal clipping on the M series stuff and I would venture to believe this is a common problem in most multi effects of this type, particularly if you are doing like Mark is doing ( and myself for that matter) which is running gain and distortion pedals at the front of your change. Add to that highly dynamic effects like filters and its easy to get clipping without seeing where it is coming from. I would imagine running a keyboard which has an even more powerful output signal than most guitars, would be even more susceptible to this kind of clipping. This may be a function of cheaper A/D converters but even my timefactor which I believe has superior headroom and A/D converters (at least it sounds that way to me) can start to self clip if you push the feedback to self oscillation. What I've noticed about the M-5 is because its only one effect at a time it seems less likely to self clip. I think many of us have gotten in to the effects Jambalaya mode of sound creation where we create our sounds out of increasingly complex combinations of effects. Nothing wrong with this for sure but its also really valid to strip back ones choices, from time to time and often times the leaner sounds work best, and provide contrast with the more complex combinations. My current loop rig goes like this, keeley compressor, ethos preamp, Line 6 M-5, Eventide time factor, Dtar preamp, Tc fireworx, or g sharp or nova reverb running in the Dtars insets and looperlative running in the Dtar's effects loop. I can either leave the rig in mono, or use both individual xlr outs from the Dtar and run the Looperlatives outputs separately to there own channel strips for a big stereo spread. This rig gives me flexibility for both acoustic and electric guitars, and to move from electric to acoustic is simply a matter of bypassing the ethos. Though I have a lot of choices usually its just some kind of delay a bit of verb, compression , and different flavors of clean and dirty. The M-5 is there for specialty effects and anything else beyond my basic food group needs, I have a lot of choices , but not so many as to be a distraction.Bill
37:
Electric instruments, acoustic instruments, one microphone, two MIDI 47:
LXP-5 multi effect unit, TC Electronics Fireworx multi effect unit, 131:
1) First stage may be a delay unit of freeze-reverb located before the 143:
Chapman Stick as the physical audio source instrument I use two
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
TC Electronic Flashback 10:
Subject: TC Electronic Flashback 37:
Just heard back from Gino. It's the TC Electronic Flashback. According
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
RE: TC Electronic Flashback 10:
Subject: RE: TC Electronic Flashback 55:
Subject: TC Electronic Flashback
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201108/msg00357:Re: Minimum Requirements (mysterious pedal named!)
36:
Just heard back from Gino. It's the TC Electronic Flashback. According 37:
to TC Electronics page, it might be only 6 seconds of looping, which 39:
for years. (I currently use two of those to help me get drones out of 61:
auxiliary loop/delay in a bigger rig is that there's an
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201203/msg00390:Re: What are the looper features that manufacturers are stupid to leave out?
21:
samplers"? Why can't a delay pedal have these features? 24:
to a delay of all proper loopers, has reverse (although if I remember 28:
Depending on the way a delay is built technically, doing reverse is more 30:
Furthermore, most delay effects are not used as loopers, so reverse
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201203/msg00392:Re: What are the looper features that manufacturers are stupid to leave out?
18:
Some good stuff there Rainer! Yeah ok if the DL4 and other short delays can do the forward/reverse it should be easy enough to add that to a long delay. Of course this is done by a knob or ex ped to go from dry to 100% wet. Should be able to make a button to do this easy enough. 20:
Basically they could do a lot more and would if there was a market for it. Sigh, being an old school delay type looping guy is tough :) So Stereo, at least two delay lines (sync or non sync), each about 30 sec minimum, reverse via ex ped/button with differing transitions, plenty of speed modifying options ala Scott Hanson plus regular harmonic transitions ala the first Boomerang, separate feedback control for each delay line operable even when it is not being overdubbed on (DD20 does this in a way), being able to feed one line into the other (or not), and some rhythmic stuff like slicing/multiply and all that other EDP style stuff that is possible, make it harmony capable like the Time Bender and hell let's make it upgradable via usb for further tweaking! 25:
Why are all loopers that have a reverse/half speed capability "phrase samplers"? Why can't a delay pedal have these features? 27:
This really depends on your definition of "phrase samplers". The EDP which, due to its concept of "primary feedback", is (to me) the closest to a delay of all proper loopers, has reverse (although if I remember correctly only got it in a later SW version?).
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
20:
While in the loop mode and the mode is turned off, it's recording. I can hear a churning and when I twist the delay time knob, the sound changes pitch. Done the factory reset on both and it still persists. 22:
When I go into any of the delay modes, the churning stops when I turn the effect off and it resumes when I go back to the loop mode. 32:
And, it's almost moot - I was trying the TC Electronics Flashback delay which has a loop function. There's no half- or double-speed function but has the sound-on-sound and it's a quarter of the width of a DL4 so seriously thinking about getting one (or two) of those to replace the DL4's. I have a TC Hall of Fame reverb and love it.
53:
Re: Recommendation for multi-fx with long delay, May 13, 2012 58:
Recommendation for multi-fx with long delay, May 12, 2012 69:
Re: Recommendation for multi-fx with long delay, May 12, 2012 72:
Re: Recommendation for multi-fx with long delay, May 13, 2012
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
18:
Talking about swells,one thing that bothers me about them is that cut off which happens randomly,i really prefer to use the guitar or volume pedal with a delay to achieve that effectby the way any interesting delay combinations with the M9 you d like to share?When using the auto-volume/delay I have learned to control the effects of accidentally having notes with full attack ring out loudly because I had not been careful to dampen my strings before initiating the next swell, thats a technique thing, the more reckless i am about it, the more likely that is going to happen, but i've also learned to use it in interesting ways, for example with a long slope of the auto volume/delay preset (where I usually like to set the effect), I can start to play a repeating figure that I start to accelerate as I start to play it harder and the end result is the line swells in but if you keep playing hard it stays at the peak of the volume threshold so you will hear all of the attack as you continue playing the lick, I will usually stop a lick like that abruptly with some delay trail, which allows me to get back to the original volume starting point. as far as delays on the M-9 pretty much the same combo of stuff i've been using for a while now, my basic bank has as the first two options the auto volume delay and the reverse, the second two options are dynamic delay and sweep delay, and the last two options are two different stereo delays as I'm fond of setting complimentary beat sub divisions, which is how i get the variety out of multiple delays they are all synced to the tap tempo or midi clocked to my LP-1. I also use a volume pedal but i rarely take it out of the studio and i use my volume controls on my electric guitars and lap steels as well, often in concert with the AVD effect. but the thing is if I'm triggering commands on a midi pedal and working _expression_ pedals for my effects as well i don't really have an extra leg for riding a volume pedal in the traditional way steel players do. Well my wife says i do but she is just being nice. On my normal gig rig where i do things like back up singer songwriters like in the band Dream Beach whose music is online, the principle songwriters have me play entire tunes using this effect which inhabits the same timbrel territory as a pedal steel guitar with out sounding necessarily country, its what has become for me an essential element in my sound.. Its why I'm hoping some one will come out with a true ADSR in a pedal, perhaps even with an _expression_ pedal port so you could continually vary the attack rate if desired, or act as a strait volume pedal if so desired. In my looping rig I have an M5 running to a tc flashback and in to a time factor, in that rig both the time factor and the M5 are receiving midi clock from the Looperlative, the TC is not but is what I will use it as a texture in first loop creation and for delays i don't need to be locked to midi clock. lately I've been particularly found of using the flashback for a full 6 seconds of backwards delay and doing quantized captures on the looperlative of those sounds.Bill
58:
Re: TC Electronic Flashback X 4, September 21, 2012 60:
TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper, September 18, 2012 152:
DL4 users jump ship? (was: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper), September 18, 2012 158:
Re: TC Electronic Flashback X 4, September 20, 2012
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201209/msg00276:RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax
3:
RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax 10:
Subject: RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax 21:
Well, I did not notice that the VE-20 has got just one loop.And if I perform in the streets I will very probably do it with a friend, so it would be nice to have two loops and also the imputs both for mic and instrument (like the rc-30).Mumble mumble.I will think about it.It is too soon. :)From: billwalker@baymoon.comTo: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.comSubject: RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT VariaxDate: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:29:19 -0700May I ask why? As a looper, I bet yes. But as a vocal effect processor, does not seem so. Well, as said, the VE has got lot of useless presets. Still, the doubler, the harmonies (yes, they will sound artificial, but you can change effect in each overdub, so, imagine a loop with some harmonies in one overdub, they will not sound so bad after all), strobo, robot, flanger, distorsion, radio, they are all very cool effects which in the street can make people listen... What make you opt more for the RC 30? hey Sergio, since I'm a guitarist, the effects that are built in to the RC-30 are more interesting to me so my opinion may not apply. Also it can run two loops at once, always a plus for composition. Much longer loop times and ability to store large numbers of loops, great for if you want to do some pre recorded sound collages or loops and have them available. I must say, I don't own either unit , but I have had ample opportunity to try out both products, and they both have their merits. for vocal products Boss is rare among companies that address street performer needs (batteries) I'd get both of them:-) Bill
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201209/msg00272:RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax
3:
RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax 10:
Subject: RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax 18:
May I ask why? As a looper, I bet yes. But as a vocal effect processor, does not seem so. Well, as said, the VE has got lot of useless presets. Still, the doubler, the harmonies (yes, they will sound artificial, but you can change effect in each overdub, so, imagine a loop with some harmonies in one overdub, they will not sound so bad after all), strobo, robot, flanger, distorsion, radio, they are all very cool effects which in the street can make people listen... What make you opt more for the RC 30? hey Sergio, since I'm a guitarist, the effects that are built in to the RC-30 are more interesting to me so my opinion may not apply. Also it can run two loops at once, always a plus for composition. Much longer loop times and ability to store large numbers of loops, great for if you want to do some pre recorded sound collages or loops and have them available. I must say, I don't own either unit , but I have had ample opportunity to try out both products, and they both have their merits. for vocal products Boss is rare among companies that address street performer needs (batteries) I'd get both of them:-) Bill
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201209/msg00261:RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax
3:
RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax 10:
Subject: RE: TC Electronic Flashback X 4 Delay And Looper and Re: OT Variax 18:
Personally, as I am a singer (or sort of) I think I will go for a Boss VE-20 unless somebody here can suggest me another battery operated looper with input for Mic, and with effects (which I use a lot). I would have loved it to have also delay (just got echo), wahwah, eq or at least octave down/up, and some other cool effect instead of all those useless presets like rock, hard rock, pop, which sound all the same with a slightly different reverb. Especially considering that you cannot combine effects as far as I understood, so a stupid effect alone is really stupid. The Boss RC-30 would be better choice than the VE-20 for all the reasons you mentionedPedal Zombie Wars, given the DL4 was killed by its maker long ago ;-) Think again Per Boy still in production I believeOf course, there's also an EH metal muff on the pedalboard in that pic, so maybe he was at the EH factoryThat would be my guess other Ted!!!Yes it's brand new and that guy was the first to get his hand on it for video reviewing purposes, according to their FB page. really? so what makes that guy so special?anyone tried NST on a Variax? I just did, in a shop, and was intrigued - it would make my playing life easier, having to switch between tunings, sometimes quickly, and needing at least two guitars for that. Now, if it had midi and a sustainer ... I wonder if it can be done and if anyone has tried? I tried the first generation variax and I found it kind of artificial sounding, but thats just me and my dinosaur taste A cheap fix if you are trying to retune a guitar with a floating tremolo is this device which can lock your trem in place for quick retuning, they work well on strat style trems and floyd rose trems too. http://www.allparts.com/SearchResults.asp?Search=tremol-no&x=27&y=13Isn't one of the Moog guitars capable of midi, sustain and tuning selection?only sustain and midi option no tuningIf you like sustainers that much, there is the Sustainiac Model C floor unit that essentially makes it possible to have a Sustainer on any guitar you own (as long as it is electric and has a headstock for the clamp-on transducer). If i had the dough the thing Ted has is what I would buy. The Sustaniac ( que the flash dance video, there is Jennifer Beals pouring water on herself to the tune of, " She's a Sustaniac sustaniac on the floor...") I too am intrigued with this device and having seen Ted play using it a number of times I can attest that it is awesome sounding and very versatile without mucking up your basic sound also the ability to move it from one guitar to another more than makes up for the cable dangling from the headstock.Bill
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: new tc electronic looper 10:
Subject: Re: new tc electronic looper 18:
I have two that do have feedback control. The EH 2880 (stereo) and the looper in the Line 6 M9 (mono). My Boss DD 20 also has feedback in the stereo 23 sec delay but not the actual looper setting in it (which I don't use). This delay type looping is my fav but it doesn't have reverse/half speed like like the first two I mentioned.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: new tc electronic looper 10:
Subject: Re: new tc electronic looper 19:
Nice — and for anyone without a looper it's probably a good choice.I think about how I seem to be working these days and I think I could go for this if it offered the following: stereo and an ability to set the feedback (e.g., by holding down the button and turning the knob). If there feedback setting were "perfect" for me I might not even care about that. A little stereo looper pedal could sit at the end of my chain and cover just about everything I care about.Give me some sort of sync cable support — see EDP brother sync — and I'll buy two (though please do this with the same flexibility as the EDP where sync means that the loop lengths are coordinated not that the start and end points have to align).And then there is what may be the "fatal" flaw: it looks like record goes to play rather than overdub. (That could be acceptable if a long press at the end of record created an overdub overlap since mostly I'm worried about delay trails.)----I was an EDP man for quite a while. I tried the Repeater. I tried the Looperlative. But the EDP was fluid. I would probably still be using the EDP were it not for not wanting to carry around a rack and missing stereo support which meant that I needed not just a rack but a rack and a mixer or I needed to throw a MIDI foot controller into the process with two EDPs.The features I most miss from the EDP:* Multiply* The ability to copy one loop into another, modify the second, and then come back to the first* Freedom to start and stop more operations at arbitrary times while still preserving synchronizationMy first CD was recorded with a single EDP.Shortly after that I went the multiple EDP route with it settling into more or less a set up where one would mostly be about recording a "pulse" to underly the piece and the other would often be used as a long, synchronized delay line — often at 0% feedback. I used to want a way to evolve away from the pulse and then back to the pulse, but that almost always seems to get complicated. Since then I've looked for ways to do this without the need for a rack and mixers.I played Y2KX using just the looper in the Line6 M13. I have to say that Line6 did manage to nail the core looping feature set quite well with lack of stereo being the chief failing. (And lack of MIDI/tempo sync given that the units have so much else that does do sync. They could just use the loop length to tweak the results of tap tempo and send MIDI clock and have a win for those of willing to start the drum machine after the loop is recorded.)I have a Boomerang III now. The sound quality, switch feel, and size are great though the size would take a serious hit if I were to add a sidecar and a pedal for volume or decay. (The sidecar with a built in roller would have been a clear win.) The problem for me with the Boomerang is that it really lives to be a phrase sampler. It's a great looper if you want to record verse/chorus/bridge and play against them. To do the sort of looping I was doing on the EDP, it's a pain and Mike Nelson has gotten a lot of long emails from me discussing how to fix this.----But if TC did a Ditto+ (it doesn't even need to be a "Ditto Pro"), I could easily see shifting to it. My feature list:* Stereo — they can go to the size of the Flashback and other Tone Print pedals.* Feedback control — two knobs instead of one. (I can think of interesting uses for more knobs in a Flashback pedal sized device, but I'm trying to stay minimal.)* Exiting record closes the loop on the press but overdubs until the release. Or they need a switch to control whether record goes into play or overdub.* Something Brother Sync like so that I can hook up a couple of these. (Even cooler if they had other pedals that also could connect on a sync buss. MIDI works but MIDI cables are awkwardly big.)-----Instead, they give me four minutes of loop time — who is going to remember where we were five minutes ago? — probably because adding more memory really doesn't require any extra design work.Mark
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: new tc electronic looper 10:
Subject: Re: new tc electronic looper 18:
On Jan 9, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Mark Hamburg wrote:But if TC did a Ditto+ (it doesn't even need to be a "Ditto Pro"), I could easily see shifting to it. My feature list:* Stereo — they can go to the size of the Flashback and other Tone Print pedals.* Feedback control — two knobs instead of one. (I can think of interesting uses for more knobs in a Flashback pedal sized device, but I'm trying to stay minimal.)* Exiting record closes the loop on the press but overdubs until the release. Or they need a switch to control whether record goes into play or overdub.* Something Brother Sync like so that I can hook up a couple of these. (Even cooler if they had other pedals that also could connect on a sync buss. MIDI works but MIDI cables are awkwardly big.)Now put that against TC's stated goals: "The guitar player's looper" and "Dirt Simple Looping".If they can bother with stereo on their Tone Print pedals, it clearly doesn't skew against those goals.Feedback is clearly viewed by pedal manufacturers as a more esoteric control though it doesn't seem to be a problem on delay pedals. It is, however, the feature that gets dropped on delays when looking for simplicity. So, while I would like a knob, I could understand burying the control.Brother Sync is a totally esoteric feature that goes against the simplicity goals. But it could be a jack that goes unused in the simple case so it isn't antithetical to it. It's more a matter that it adds cost to the product for a feature that won't appeal to the target market (but might help sell more pedals by making it worthwhile to own two or more looper pedals).Mark
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
3:
Re: new tc electronic looper 10:
Subject: Re: new tc electronic looper 18:
Thanks. I should probably dig my 2880 out of the closet and try it again. When I first got it, I though it wasn't really going to work as an on-the-fly looper for me.On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Jeff Duke <jeffloops@gmail.com> wrote:I have two that do have feedback control. The EH 2880 (stereo) and the looper in the Line 6 M9 (mono). My Boss DD 20 also has feedback in the stereo 23 sec delay but not the actual looper setting in it (which I don't use). This delay type looping is my fav but it doesn't have reverse/half speed like like the first two I mentioned.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201302/msg00013:Re: Vox Delaylab- very mini review
18:
Your pricing comparison is incorrect. The Delaylab is approx $220 USD. The X4 is approx $249 USD. Not counting the cost of a TC Ditto. Just watched demos of both on YouTube by Pro Guitar. Both seem like fairly decent units for the cost. 47:
I got a email from Vox yesterday:"Try out a Delaylab and we'll give you a free tuner".too good an opportunity to miss, so went down to the local Vox dealer to confound the shop staff and do exactly that.So, the delaylab as a looper:-Given that this was done in a noisy music shop with no manual,a random amp and a new guitar (without strap) which hadn't been set up.1) It *doesn't* have a feedback control as implied in the manual, just one loop algorithm where the loop does fade slightly on overdub at a preset rate. - - -2) Selecting any algorithm calls up a factory preset, particularly annoying when you select the one "loop with fade" algorithm which is paired with an awful sounding delay with cheap reverb. - - - 3) There are two other algorithms with looping, but both have 48:
100% feedback. Possibly one of those has a usable delay...but when you switch to the "fading loop" you call up that dreadful reverby setting ( and have to turn a knob to get rid of it every time) - - -4) Each delay mode, including the one with looper has 3 algorithms. The only way to see which algorithm you're in in to press a select button...which changes it and calls up factory presets. -5) Loop functions are Rec/Dub, PLay/Stop/(hold to Clear), Reverse, Re-trigger. 6) You can Re-trigger while overdubbing, but you can't reverse.7) Procedure to replace a loop with a newly recorded one is Stop, longpressStop, Rec8) Tap tempo delays aren't possible while looping. -9) I think there's some kind of metronome type sync mode that I didn't try. As a looper compared to DL41) Re-trigger doesn't force you into one-shot mode. +2) No Half Speed - -3) With the DL4 I 49:
could straight away work arrangements that combined the onboard delay with the looper. This *may* be possible with the delaylab, but I didn't manage it. - -As a delay1) Tap time possible. +2) When changing delay time some algorithms do pitch bend like the DL4 (not like changing tape speed!) +3) Some algorithms allowed you to start with a short delay and tap in a multiply ( up to 4S ) + +4) Real fun was had with a delay with pitch shift in the feedback loop. but note that while a shift of a 4th up worked quite well the 5th up sounded a bit rough and the octave up was unusable. (i.e. that's like those cheap pitch shifters from over a decade ago). + and overall:It's much bigger than you'd think. About 50% larger than DL4 in all dimensions.The Delaylab does have savable presets, so it's possible that with a bit of effort it would get more user friendly.I couldn't
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
22:
you can prepare new audio on the mixer to add? Of course the two 31:
Sync Delay" control in its preferences, just to trim the mixer and 78:
> hardware looper like the Roland RC-300 or maybe TC Helicon VoiceLOve 114:
>>and delay that you add to your mixing desk stream.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
44:
an awful sounding delay with cheap reverb. - - - 46:
3) There are two other algorithms with looping, but both have 100% feedback. Possibly 48:
one of those has a usable delay...but when you switch to the "fading 53:
4) Each delay mode, including the one with looper has 3 algorithms.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
30:
looper like the Roland RC-300 or maybe TC Helicon VoiceLOve Touch 2 which 66:
>and delay that you add to your mixing desk stream. 154:
>>>> on. Maybe Song B will use two scenes--one each in different parts of 174:
>>>are two options for controlling scens in Live; you may launch a scene
44:
an awful sounding delay with cheap reverb. - - - 46:
3) There are two other algorithms with looping, but both have 100% feedback. Possibly 47:
one of those has a usable delay...but when you switch to the "fading 52:
4) Each delay mode, including the one with looper has 3 algorithms.
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201312/msg00137:Re: difference harmonix 45000 and bo
18:
Afterthought:Rack units are often designed not to require seeing or touching during performance. A MIDI-controlled Looperlative LP1 or two, synchronized Gibson Echoplex Digital Pros would do well for the sight-impaired. Yesterday, 12/11, Steve Uccello wrote that he's selling his LP1, with a MIDI pedal.Two Looperlative LP2 pedals or two TC Electronics Dittos (or one a TC Electronics Flashback for reverse, delay, and some looping), with an analog signal switcher (the other kind of looper), would also work.The advantage of two LP2's is that you would have four assignable foot switches. Each could be dedicated to a single function prior to or during performance (e.g., reverse, 1/2 or 1/4 speed, replace, retrigger). The LP2s can be MIDI synced.The advantage of the Ditto is that it is designed to be controlled solely by a tap pattern on a single foot switch. You could hardwire a third switch to the pedals' switches, synchronizing them.I believe that the Boomerang's rotary, function selector does not have stop pins. This could cause problems for the sight-impaired during live performance.Neal
32:
Be aware there are delays/loopers that MIDI sync only the delay part (TC 35:
others sync only the length of initial loop (TC Helicon VoiceLive family). 52:
I sold my EDPs two years ago, and started using ableton. Needless to
201411/msg00087:Re: what is the state of things with pedals these days?
18:
Yes, I use the Flashback 1 with a certain tape delay patch I 19:
downloaded from TC. The default patches doesn't make the unit stand 23:
music out of the Mud Zone. In that tape delay tone print this is done 25:
into shimmering diffusion. After two or three loop rounds the old
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
201411/msg00079:Re: what is the state of things with pedals these days?
18:
Yeah Per, i'm about to pick up a TC Flashback Triple Delay for the same reason. Figured I could control feedback to achieve simple goals. considering that, at least. I grabbed the Flashback X4 for a minute but sending it back. The looper works fine, but the instant groove thang is what I'm looking for. On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote:I sometimes use two delays rather than loopers these days. For my simplest pedalboard the TC Flashback #1 really shines (set to two-channel output in stereo with straight eighths/fourths on one side and triplets on the other side, "instant groove thing")Greetings from SwedenPer Boysenwww.perboysen.comhttp://www.youtube.com/perboysen 19:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Sylvain Poitras <sylvain.trombone@gmail.com> wrote:On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, todd reynolds <toddreyn@gmail.com> wrote:What are people feelin these days?One trend is definitely towards the small nano type of loopers. Individually, nothing too exciting, but the sheer number you can fit on a board can lead to interesting possibilities (assuming you're into unsynchronized loop and resampling your loops downstream.)For instance:http://www.hotoneaudio.com/skyline/wallylooper.htmlhttp://www.tcelectronic.com/ditto-looper/http://www.tcelectronic.com/ditto-x2-looper/http://www.ehx.com/products/nano-looper-360http://www.tcelectronic.com/flashback-delay/http://digitech.com/en/products/jamman-express-xthttp://www.zvex.com/junky.htmlSylvain
201411/msg00078:Re: what is the state of things with pedals these days?
18:
I sometimes use two delays rather than loopers these days. For my simplest pedalboard the TC Flashback #1 really shines (set to two-channel output in stereo with straight eighths/fourths on one side and triplets on the other side, "instant groove thing")Greetings from SwedenPer Boysenwww.perboysen.comhttp://www.youtube.com/perboysen 19:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Sylvain Poitras <sylvain.trombone@gmail.com> wrote:On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:15 PM, todd reynolds <toddreyn@gmail.com> wrote:What are people feelin these days?One trend is definitely towards the small nano type of loopers. Individually, nothing too exciting, but the sheer number you can fit on a board can lead to interesting possibilities (assuming you're into unsynchronized loop and resampling your loops downstream.)For instance:http://www.hotoneaudio.com/skyline/wallylooper.htmlhttp://www.tcelectronic.com/ditto-looper/http://www.tcelectronic.com/ditto-x2-looper/http://www.ehx.com/products/nano-looper-360http://www.tcelectronic.com/flashback-delay/http://digitech.com/en/products/jamman-express-xthttp://www.zvex.com/junky.htmlSylvain
9:
From: Matt Connell <Matt.Connell@tc-helicon.com> 18:
Hi Amy, my name is Matt and I work for TC-Helicon, so perhaps I may be 29:
http://www.tc-helicon.com/en/products/mic-mechanic/http://www.tc-helicon.com/en/products/mic-mechanic/ 39:
TC-Helicon Music On Mobile
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
18:
Per's VL2 suggestion is certainly a good one. The microphone stand mounted touch interface is probably good for your act, Amy. But it also provides a lot more firepower/effects than you’re looking for (good thing? bad thing?). An alternative, simpler pedal that sounds great is the Flashback (also TC Helicon):http://www.tcelectronic.com/flashback-delay/It’s essentially just a delay pedal, but the knobs make it very easy to get all the sound support you’re looking for — without lots of confusing extras (though it does have a simple looping function too). There are two other versions of the Flashback (mini, X4, Triple), but this mid-grade one is likely the one you want.I’ve used this nifty little thing to turn my signal to stereo and send it to my RC3 looper for many solo vocal gigs. Very simple & compact, very full sound, very nice price ($100 bucks). Hope that helps!Sam Rogershttp://OneMouthBand.com/ From: Amy X Neuburg <amyx@isproductions.com>Subject: vocal effects processors?Date: July 25, 2015 at 12:59:42 AM MDTTo: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.comI bet you folks will have some suggestions for inexpensive live vocal processor pedals.For those rare gigs where I’m just singing (not schlepping all my gear), I like a little reverb on my voice, and occasionally a tube distortion effect or a delay. Many of the little art houses where I frequently play have no effects in-house, so I bring my old Dynachord rack unit and hook it up to their mixer as a send. Sounds great.But this is a pain, and I can’t change effects from the stage, so I’m thinking about a pedal or other small device to use like an insert. This will color the sound, I realize, so I wonder if anyone knows of a particularly clean one. I’m okay without huge programming capability — some good presets with a few adjustable parameters would be fine. Do not need looper, do not need harmonizer, do not need auto-tune (blech!). Does something this simple even exist?I see a TC Helicon Single R1 that does ONLY reverb. That’s TOO simple.Thanks! — AmyπππππππππππππππππππππAmy X Neuburghttp://www.amyxneuburg.comπππππππππππππππππππππ
19:
> An alternative, simpler pedal that sounds great is the Flashback (also TC 21:
> http://www.tcelectronic.com/flashback-delay/ 25:
of reverb you can get from it is the typical tape delay style reverb, 28:
delay slaps on straight notes, delay slaps on triplets and finally
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
9:
From: Matt Connell <Matt.Connell@tc-helicon.com> 21:
TC-Helicon MMP 23:
TC Group 30:
matt.connell@tc-helicon.com
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
18:
Can the TimeFactor do tape echo or analog echo simulations while doing independent stereo delays? One of the things that I like about the TC Nova (and TC's other delay pedals) is that the dual delay settings are available for all delay tones, not just a specific dual digital delay. The TC Nova Delay will even do ducking in combination with analog or tape effects and dual delays though sadly I don't think their ducking works as well as Line 6's. (As with the auto swell, I think Line 6 has managed to hit on really good envelope response.) On the other hand, much as I like aspects of the TC delays, I also get frustrated with them — particularly with the Alter Ego X4 which has some nice delay models but brain dead interaction between presets, tempo, and _expression_ pedal settings. (Brain dead interaction that could probably be fixed by having a position on the time knob that just meant "use the currently tapped tempo".)Now, what would be really fun is dual delay lines with _expression_ pedal controlled feedback v cross-feedback a la at least one of the algorithms on the Vortex.MarkOn Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, bill walker <wildbillwalker@icloud.com> wrote:Im very satisfied using two Neunaber products and an Eventide time factor to create my spatial and ambient effects, the Eventide does the heavy lifting of delays, usually stereo though it sums nicely to mono if needed. Im also always controlling delay tempo via midi from my looper. I like using two different subdivisions at the same time to create a syncopated delay that enhances the stereo spread. These include 1/4 note and dotted 1/8th note together for 4/4 time, and triplet 1/4 or 1/8th against 1/4 note or 1/8th note for 12/8 feel. _expression_ pedal control is usually increasing both mix depth and feedback as I move from heel to toe.Then I use a Neunaber V2 Seraphim shimmer verb which has 4 presets controlled by an EXP switcher, two types of shimmer verb,( essentially a reverb with a high octave delay trail), and two type of Wet reverb, in both cases the depth control is actually moving through different room sizes that get bigger as the depth increases, culminating in a very large near infinite reverb. Then I use another wet reverb pedal, loaded with an echelon echo preset that uses a soft scatter delay algorithm that scatters and diffuses quickly after the initial delay pulse.This particular echo is somewhat unique in that the mix control is actually controlling how much direct signal is routed to the delay. This is very handy in creating echo blooms with not initial note attack sounding, if I use an _expression_ pedal and play a chord while in heal down position and move quickly to toe down. The _expression_ pedal is essential for me when using these effects as I can make my reverbs deepen and grow in length with my pedal position. The Mission expressionator has become absolutely essential for harnessing the power of these three effects processors as I can control the overall depth of each effect individually , or I can control all three pedals effects depth at once, using a single _expression_ pedal as an example I like to strum a chord or play a note with a relatively dry sound and use the _expression_ pedal to bloom the note . Kind of like walking from an acoustically dead room, in to a stairwell. What I like about this method is it sounds very natural to me, not like stereo phase shifting and filtering effects that sound very obvious to me, like fake wind. I like both the filter pong and band delay settings on the Eventide, though I use them much less often the ducking delay, reverse delay and modulation delay algorithms. Here are a couple links to Neunaber and Mission. Everyone here is already aware of that Eventide company. Speaking of which, I know how crazy everyone is over the new H-9's , but I really wish they had kept the same size pedal format as their other pedals and not gotten rid of the extra foot pedal port, On my Time Factor I have both the _expression_ pedal and a three button footswitch attached, The three button footswitch allows me to remotely control the hold function, and have individual control over the right and left delays feedback, making it easy to jump from single repeat to 110% self oscilation on either delay. That being said, Im still lusting after an H-9. Billhttp://neunaber.nethttp://missionengineering.com/?product=expressionator-2
51:
> Hi Amy, my name is Matt and I work for TC-Helicon, so perhaps I may be 63:
> http://www.tc-helicon.com/en/products/mic-mechanic/http://www.tc-helicon.com/en/products/mic-mechanic/ 73:
> TC-Helicon Music On Mobile 75:
> TC Group
Limit of 5 matched lines per file exceeded...
Summary for query "tc;two;delay":
Found 2697 matches in 327 files.
209 matches in HTML tags ignored.
Archive Top | Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info