Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81



Thanks, Luca.

Well, I do like clean so that is a plus for me on the Fireworx.  The 
Reverb 
quality is not an issue for me as I add reverb only after my looping unit, 
and I plan to use the Eclipse or Fireworx before the looper. I'm a firm 
advocate of adding reverb after and never before my looping device. I'll 
be 
using one of my VF1's for post loop reverb....good enough for live 
applications.

Kris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Luca Formentini" <luca@unguitar.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: Thoughts on the Eclipse, Fireworx, G-Force, and PCM81


> Hi Kris,
> I've worked with all these effects and I have a Fireworx and an Orville 
>in 
> my rack.
> I can second all what David Coffin has said, I just add one thing:
> The Fireworx has great filters, a great compressor and a very nice 
>formant 
> algorithm.
> I am using the Fwx mainly for loops post processing but I also want to 
> keep it available for my main guitar input as it has a "sound" which is 
> very different form the Orville ( and also from the Eclipse, which is 
>more 
> "thick" compared to the Orville).
> The Fwx sound can be described as "sterile" by some, but I think it is 
>one 
> of the most clean and "percussive" ones I've ever heard from these kind 
>of 
> processors; so I like it, specially on very clean parts.
> Its reverbs are nothing compared to Eventides and Lexicon.
> It is a box that is lacking of a deeper evolution and has a few 
> limitations ( as has already been touched by David and Per) but it is 
>one 
> of those boxes which has a very distinctive character.
> If I could bring up another ( elder), very interesting box, it would be 
> the Sony Dps V77.
> Anyway, if I should choose one between the ones you wrote I would go 
>with 
> the Eclipse, all in all it is the most complete one and it is the one 
> which has the best reverbs and delays.
>
> my best,
> luca
> www.unguitar.com
>
>
> Krispen Hartung wrote:
>
>> I'd like to get your thoughts on the Eventide Eclipse, TC Electronic 
>> Fireworx, TC Electrronics G-Force, and Lexicon PCM81. If I had to 
>invest 
>> in only one of these, which would give me the most tone mangling / 
>effect 
>> goodies for the buck?  The Fireworx appears to have a lot of different 
>> types of effects, more than the other two from what I can tell, but I'd 
>> like to hear from some of you who own these units.
>>
>> I'm looking for a unit, preferrable, that has all the standard delay, 
>> reverb, pitch, and chorus/modulation effects, but also ring mod, 
>> hopefully some quasi-synth guitar like effects, Filter, and whatever 
>else 
>> it can muster.  I've heard some really ethereal and rich pad-like 
>sounds 
>> from the Eventides, which I really like, so that is a must.
>>
>> Why you ask? Now that my laptop system is complete and serving me well, 
>> I'm building a botique, yet simple rack system on the 
>> side...Looperlative, two VF1s', and whatever I decide from the above 
>five 
>> units.
>>
>> Kris
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>
> 



Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!