[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

**To**:**Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com****From**:**Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com>****Subject**:**Re: WHY - multiply?****Date**:**Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:01:46 -0300**

since I think of myself as the creator of this function its a pleasure to read what great users think about it! its the one function I used a lot personally and I often felt the desire to change the short base loop after the multiplication, which is possible if multiply happens on a new track and thus only could be done with two EDPs then again I love unrounded multiply too... does it work on several tracks in some apps? now this made me type here: On 12 Dec 2011, at 11:08, Per Boysen wrote:
seems that the public prefers to watch some real idiot than a perfect movie illusion :-) so its not just the gospel of looping, but of the NOW - or what? I remember Randolf saying that he sometimes introduces errors just so the public feels that its real, and this is also a clowns tradition: let the ball drop once and you get the sympathy of the public so I am even thinking of building the Evoloop without loop saving function! |

**Follow-Ups**:- Re: WHY - multiply?
*From:*mark francombe <markfrancombe@gmail.com>

- Re: WHY - multiply?
*From:*Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>

- Re: WHY - multiply?

**References**:- Re: WHY - multiply?
*From:*Grant <grantmepeace@mindspring.com>

- Re: WHY - multiply?
*From:*Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>

- Re: WHY - multiply?
*From:*"Buzap Buzap" <buzap@gmx.net>

- Re: WHY - multiply?
*From:*Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>

- Re: WHY - multiply?

- Prev by Date: Re: Cass county waltz
- Next by Date: Re: WHY - multiply?
- Previous by Thread: Re: WHY - multiply?
- Next by Thread: Re: WHY - multiply?
- Index(es):