Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: loop sync semantics




[jeff]
> > The first press would wait for the master loop start point.

[andy]
> Only if Quantise is used


Really?  I missed that.  Page 6-7 doesn't mention that you have to
have Quantise=Cycle but that would make sense.

But if Quantise is not on, how does it know to make the loop an exact
multiple of the master cycle?  When you end the recording it could not
"continue until the next pulse comes in" (step 7 on 6-8).  If it did
then you would end up with a loop that was a fraction of the master
cycle, it started in the middle but ended at the next "pulse".

If Quantize is off, does it always assume that a brother sync'd
recording will be a multiple of the master cycle length, in effect a
different form of "relative" quantization?  
Or is it more like Tempo Select?

Thanks,
Jeff


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!