] [Thread Prev
Re: Getting rid of the Vortex...
Quoting mark <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 02:10 PM, Eric Williamson wrote:
> > when i had a vortex i used it in both places, via the Repeater's ill-
> > implemented FX Insert function.
> Ill implemented? Seems like an amazing feature to me that always seems
i say ill implemented because they didn't have the time to provide any
control for the insert, but did take the time to _make_sure_ you could
use Resample to recursively process through the FX insert. it looks like
could use it for that, and that's the _easiest_ and least
to implement resampling. but when i think of all the r/d time wasted on
that buffering code (and memory wasted to execute the operation), it
burns me they wasted all this time with LPA and a castrated re-sample.
if Resample let you continue to resample after the loop-point ended
buffering the last cycle), i wouldn't be selling my Repeater this weekend:
be selling my Prodigy to buy another one.
remember: i'm not expecting a "weird" feature. recursive resampling
expected if resample allows you to go beyond one complete cycle.
i am rambling on 3 hours sleep, so please let me know if i make no sense :)
> So, I actually got the MPX1 to replace the Vortex, and to be honest,
> I've never looked back. If you're low on cash and looking for an
sounds like a keeper to me. something that kind of kept me from really
exploiting the Vortex is that i never _really_ understood what was going
thanks for the input!
looks like i'll be selling some stuff to buy an mpx-1 ...
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/