RE: Gig spam--in two hours in San Diego

["Liebig, Steuart A." <Steuart.Liebig@maritz.com>]

Title: RE: Gig spam--in two hours in San Diego

also no LD folks (that I could tell), which is probably fine, since there was roughly as much looping
on this gig as on the one I slammed Stig about last year--

** well this brings up an interesting issue, or series of issues. how much looping does one need to have on a "looping gig"?

is it 100%, 80%, 70%, 50%?

if one is doing improv and the spirit of the evening drives one away from doing 70% or more looping, does it make it a non-looping gig? a follow-up would be what's more important, the amount of looping or following the music? (in other words, does the technique drive the gig or the music?)

i've had a few people ask me if i was going to go to one of the looping fests and play. my response i both cases was taht i wasn't sure that i would be doing enough looping to "qualify" . . . depending on what moved me that night, i might not pass the litmus test of having enough looping content, or that the way id o it would be considered appropriate.

just wondering,

stig

Confidentiality Warning:  This e-mail contains information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any dissemination, publication or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. The sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss, disruption or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data contained in, or transmitted with, this e-mail.   If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail.  Thank you.