] [Thread Prev
Re: Fractal looping
A pity late to mention surround as the alternative to the MONO shift salad
of Phil Spector.
Room sound is not a new thing.At least an old thing.
After establishing Stereo Sound,the engineers were busy to make a
quadrophonic sound in the early
Traced from this,todays surround sound is old dutch cheese.
Tjhe problem of todays surround is the compression.For movie it is OK.For
Audio a worse situation.
A Stereo signal gets splitted up in pseudo surround
Does someone remeber the World Exhibitiomn in Osaka 1970 ? Stockhausen had
surrounding sound on this fair.Does someone remember ?
Well,the sound of this construction was much better as what we call today
It needed a flexible kind of live electronic musican,today we would call it
DJ,to bring this
sounds to the folks.
30 years later we still grabble in a sound,wich could be expanded more.
I stil have not heard a DVD wich shows another direction.DVD can,but it
depends on the artist.
So todays surround is only a shadow of that,what could be really possible
>Von: "Italo De Angelis" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Betreff: Re: Fractal looping
>Datum: Mon, 21. Mai 2001 17:03 Uhr
>Well...2001...SURROUND ! ! !
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Martin Tauchen" <Pohon-Kelapa@t-online.de>
>Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 4:55 PM
>Subject: Re: Fractal looping
>> I donīt think that Italo follows the wall of sound of Phil Spector !
>> was monophonic.
>> >Von: Claude Voit <email@example.com>
>> >An: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>> >Betreff: Re: Fractal looping
>> >Datum: Mon, 21. Mai 2001 18:35 Uhr
>> >Italo De Angelis wrote:
>> >> ...and think you can do THIS all with just ONE POWERFUL unit, MARTIN
>> >why do you own two of them ?
>> >isnt one enough to fill the complete spectrum with a wall of sounds and
>> >what could you use a second orville for