Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness



to this:
"Your suddenly have a funk rhythm that has a completely different feel 
than the original rhythm."

Toby Graves responded:

"Yes, but that feel is gonna depend on how much it swings or how much the 
beat drags.   Lars Ulrich 
could play that pattern and fit it in a Metallica song."


Obviously,  the feel of a rhythm can morph depending on it's use of swing; 
 playing ahead or 
behind the beat,  Toby.

The distinction in the cased you are talking about, however,   is timbral 
and NOT rhythmic.

Looking at the history of the developement of syncopation in pop  music in 
the United States in the 
20th century,    the first example I wrote came first and was associated 
with rhythm and blues or 
soul.................it has an 8th note syncopative resolution.

The second example introduces an implied 16th note syncopative resolution 
and occurred 
several years after the advent of the first rhythm;   first with James 
Browns' drummers and then later 
with the style that came to be known as Funk.

Metallica could play the second rhythm,  but it's roots would still be in 
Funk as a style from a 
rhythmic historical perspective and NOT in Rock and Roll (the genre 
associated with 
Metallica)...............the fact that they'd use liberal use of 
distortion and James rough vocal approach 
(and I dig Metallica, by the way)  only changes the timbre of the piece, 
not the rhythm.

If he were to swing it slightly (or even greatly) it would merge into hip 
hop as a style (and this is 
largely due to the fact that inexpensive drum machines used in early hip 
hop,  had 58% swing 
capabilities that were used by the early producers to get a different feel.

As soon as Bonham started introducing 16th note funk rhythms into hard 
rock with Led Zepellin or 
when Quiincy Jones put a rock and roll 8th note groove under MIchael 
Jackson's decidedly funk/r&b 
rhythmic approach (and then added icing to the cake by having Eddy Van 
Halen play a blistering 
heavy metal lead over the whole stew),  the styles of rock, jazz, r&b, 
soul and funk began to merge 
all over popular music.  

Now you have heavily EBM/Industrial influenced Samba 
records...........they fit into the Industrial sub 
genre, stylistically because of the way they sound,  but their historic 
rhythmic roots are still in Afro-
Brazilian music which further illustrates my point:

In repetitive 'groove' oriented syncopated rhythmic pop music,   each 
individual rhythm has a distinct 
personality and affects the nervous system in a different way.

Even by changing only the voices in a rhythmic arrangement (think playing 
Cream's 'Sunshine of Your 
Love"  with the backbeat on the 2 and 4 ---- thank you Earl Palmer instead 
of the way Ginger Baker 
played it on the 1 and the 3)   you have a distinctively different rhythm.

If Metallica played both rhythms in back to back songs on the same record, 
  the songs would each 
have a distinctively different feel.

Does that make sense?

--