Re: Live Looping signal chain

[Chris Sewell <lunamusic@mac.com>]

I've experimented with routing via sends to multiple instances of  
Sopperlooper within Live. I can get very interesting. A bit of a  
challenge to keep everything straight in the head, but real fun.
On Jan 11, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Qua Veda wrote:

> Is anyone putting FX after the loopers so they can apply and vary FX  
> over
> time to a loop that is playing ?
> -Q
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Per Boysen [mailto:perboysen@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:25 PM
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Subject: Re: Live Looping signal chain
>
> On Jan 11, 2008 7:42 PM, Daniel Dingeldein <dgd0460@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Got a couple of questions.
>>
>> 1.  When you guys do live looping on stage, where in the signal  
>> chain do
>> you place your looper?  I have a JamMan and am wanting to  
>> incorporate it.
>>
>> 2. For those of you that use 2 loopers, do you use a AB switch and  
>> put
>> the loopers on different paths or do you keep them on the same signal
> route?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>
>
> 1. I like to put the loopers as the last units so I can loop effects
> as part of the sound I'm working with.
>
> 2. I simply split the signal to all loopers. The loopers I put into
> Record mode records, the others don't. I on signal split bypasses the
> loopers and goes directly to the output, since all loopers are set to
> "wet" mode.
>
> I'm not saying this way is better, I just find it easy to handle for
> the music I like to make.
>
> -- 
> Greetings from Sweden
>
> Per Boysen
> www.boysen.se (Swedish)
> www.looproom.com (international)
>
>