Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: very special floor-based looper



Jeffrey Larson wrote:
> 
>  > My opinion...this is totally asinine, if true, and folks
>  > should storm the Bastille to change it. :)
> 
> Yes, on the surface this sounds like a supremely dumb design choice.
> Build a device that can only run Windows DLLs, but doesn't actually
> run Windows, so developers have yet another platform to support.  I
> hope there were good reasons for doing this, perhaps it is difficult
> to make Windows run well on hardware like this, maybe there were
> licensing issues.  I'm sure there were OS modifications they could do
> to Linux to make it more reliable that could never be done to Windows.

AFAIR from the first product, most things non-Linux was licenced stufff 
with their (part) own wrappers, that had to be paid for.
I was resently corrected WRT VST on Linux et al.., which I didn't know 
was opensourced (though on a license). At least no VST implementation 
existed back then, readily available to developers for general use.

I'll just zip it for now, else I'll get myself on too thin ice ;)

-- 
rgds,
van Sinn


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!
Get the Looper's Delight Vol 2 CD!
Get the Looper's Delight Vol 2 CD!