RE: y2k7 mp3s

["Qua Veda" <qua@oregon.com>]

Hi again, Kris
Interesting , on the "another experiment",  I actually preferred the Edirol
recording. Larger sound stage, and the low freq sound OK to me.  
I really wish I could have stayed thru Sunday to hear this live,
fascinating!

-Qua

-----Original Message-----
From: Krispen Hartung [mailto:khartung@cableone.net] 
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:41 PM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: y2k7 mp3s

Here is an experiment:

Listen to both of these recordings of Henry Kaiser at Y2K7, or just the 
first minute of each file to get a flavor of the sound.
http://www.box.net/shared/8bqpziuucu
http://www.box.net/shared/eab932crud

Can anyone here any differences in the two files? If so, what? Which one 
do 
you prefer?

Another experiment:

These two files of are of me and Lucio Menegon. One is direct from the 
board, the other is just from his Eidorol recorder.
http://www.box.net/shared/static/4hbusvh7cd.mp3 (MP3) - Soundboard Version
http://www.box.net/shared/static/kiq0gf9key.mp3 (MP3) - Live mic version

Any preference? Notice how the mic version in no way captures the major 
low 
end frequency of my guitar part (using pitch shifter and string tuned down 
to very low...it's probably in the 10-20k range. I don't think I've 
experienced a mic that could capture this in the same way as the driect 
recording. Maybe a $1000 + grade mic?

Kris