Re: RC-2 : First impressions / comparison RC-50

["Krispen Hartung" <khartung@cableone.net>]

Exactly. And I was thinking of fairly basic VST effects, no monsters like 
Antares Filter, etc. Things like some of the simple but utterly tone 
mangling effects from Pluggo, Toy Bear, PSP, etc. Heck, we could make the 
pedal just a bit wider than the orginary stomp box and cram 10 small nobs 
on 
it with a save preset feature...voillla! Imagine loading your favorite vst 
delay or chorus on the pedal, and then programming which parameters you 
want 
the pedal nobs to control.

Kris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kelly Coyle" <skcoyle@gmail.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: RC-2 : First impressions / comparison RC-50


> Obviously, it would have USB to tweak parameters and map them to the
> handy onboard controllers and footswitches for performance, which it
> would store in flash. Or presets.
>
>
>
>
> On 8/24/07, Travis Hartnett <travishartnett@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't see the main obstacle being the processor, but rather the
>> screen and input device (keyboard/mouse replacement).  Most VST stuff
>> is designed to have a big colorful UI on a computer screen and have
>> the parameters tweaked with keyboard/mouse commands.  Displays are
>> pricey and cumbersome, so I'd think it's hard to beat the
>> price/convenience of a laptop for that sort of thing.
>>
>> TH
>>
>> On 8/24/07, Qua Veda <qua@oregon.com> wrote:
>> > The microprocessor companies are working on "System on a Chip" for 
>low 
>> > cost,
>> > mobile devices. Probably only a couple of years before it could be 
>used 
>> > for
>> > ultramobile or small  VST boxes  :-)
>> > -Qua
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> http://quotidianme.kellycoyle.net
> http://organicguitar.kellycoyle.net
>