Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RC-2 : First impressions / comparison RC-50



Didn't they already do VST in a rack-mountable box (more than once I
think)?  My recollection was that most PC-based folks thought the
tradeoff in rackability wasn't worth the price (about $2K as I recall)
for a computer that wouldn't do anything but serve as a VST host.

TH

On 8/24/07, midifriedchicken@comcast.net <midifriedchicken@comcast.net> 
wrote:
> "Hey, about VST in a box?  It would be like a single effect pedal 
>version of
> the Muse Receptor. Now that would be nice!  Sorry, I'm just dreaming, 
>with
> not enough coffee in my bloodstream this morning."
>
> Give it 5 years. I would bet this is the future of high end effects. It 
>would make manufacuring much easier.
> Hmm. Anyone want to go into business?
>


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!