Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: improv vs arrangement




>On 27 Jul 2006 at 11:07, mark sottilaro wrote:
>
> > > --- "nick@12testing.net" <nick@12testing.net> wrote:
> > > Due largely to the technicalities (an old jamman), I'm 100% 
>improvised,
>
> > I don't understand that statement.  The old JamMan
> > seems really well suited for arranged premeditated
> > loops in a song type of structure...
>
>Sorry, I didn't make myself clear - I meant by comparison with the
>modern machines, where you can easily store multiple loops and switch
>/ mix between them to create an arrangement, rather than the jamman
>"buld up, fade away" variety.
>All the best,
>Nick Robinson

As Mark syncs to a drum machine, the JamMan allows him to switch 
between different loops
really easily.
It's because the JamMan makes all loops exactly the same length that 
it's impractical to try and create more than one loop when there's no 
guide, it's next to impossible to get the timing accurate .
Try shorter loops, ( but I gave up and got an EDP)

andy butler 


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!
Please support Looper's Delight, buy something from Amazon!
Please support Looper's Delight, buy something from Amazon!