Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: laptop audio I/O hardware



> From: Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill
> say you have a fixed computer system (same installation, same 
> application), and use two different interfaces. Then you reduce 
> the latency (of the driver, as you point out) up to the point
> where you get artifacts. If the setting of one interface is
> considerably lower than that of the other one, it's in my eyes
> safe to say that "the interface has lower latency"

True.  My claim is that this is usually not the case for most mid to
high range audio interfaces designed for musicians.  If they're both
using the same physical interface (USB, FW, PCI) and there is still a
big difference in the lowest buffer size, it means the device driver
is poorly written.  It isn't that hard to write an ASIO device driver.
If there is a problem in a driver, it tends to get fixed quickly because
this is a very competitive market.

> From: Jeff Kaiser [mailto:loopersdelight@pfmentum.com] 
> But I can honestly state my experience, which is, and remains:
> On the same system, same settings, same software: latency is 
> different between the m-audio I used and the motu.

This can only be because the buffer sizes were different.  Did you
specifically set the ASIO buffer sizes (or whatever the equivalent is
on the Mac) after swapping devices?  Installing a new audio device can
sometimes change the default ASIO buffer size.  Some drivers may be
more conservative than others.  If you had never manually changed your
buffer size, then my belief is that the MOTU install lowered your
buffer size without you knowing it.  This then wouldn't be a fair
comparison.  You would have to return to the M-Audio with the new
lower buffer size and see if it works without clicks.  If it does then
the latencies are effectively the same.

If you are claiming that the buffer sizes were the same and you can
detect the minute differences between the digital/analog converters,
well congratulations because you're one of the very few people
on the planet that can do that.  :-)

Jeff


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!