Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: laptop audio I/O hardware



> If you had never manually changed your
> buffer size, then my belief is that the MOTU install lowered your
> buffer size without you knowing it.  This then wouldn't be a fair
> comparison.  You would have to return to the M-Audio with the new
> lower buffer size and see if it works without clicks.  If it does then
> the latencies are effectively the same.

The buffers are set in the DSP options of the application itself. They 
remained the same.

Could the driver itself change the CPU load? Would that affect latency? 
(I.e., a poorly written driver vs. a well written driver could make a 
difference?)

>
> If you are claiming that the buffer sizes were the same and you can
> detect the minute differences between the digital/analog converters,
> well congratulations because you're one of the very few people
> on the planet that can do that.  :-)

dude. Flattery will get you everywhere with me! :-)

rock on,

Jeff


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!