Re: For your listening amusement

[David Coffin <dpcoffin@earthlink.net>]

Enjoyed it here, mostly..."soundscapes" don't need to be "ambient" to 
suit me, and I wasn't looking for an ambient experience, or anything 
except interest. I found it had a very engaging density and it was 
inventive and mercurial enough to kept my attention very nicely; 
thanks! More subjectivity: The inclusion of last few minutes, the bits 
after the little gap, disturbed the focus I'd been enjoying up to that 
point. The last stuff sounded like a more or less random grab from a 
longer session, and seemed to me to reinforce the idea that everything 
that had proceeded it was more randomly created than it felt like at 
the time. For me, this was unfortunate, but maybe it was intentional?
dc


On Feb 14, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Tony K wrote:

>>> --- Tony K <bigtony@softhome.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Loopy people,
>>>>
>>>> I've been doing loopy soundscapes for a few
>> months