] [Thread Prev
Re: a general question
--- Lance Chance <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> whoever cares to reply. you consider your loop work:
> 1 totally ambient, atonal, arrhythmic
> 3 a little of both, some of both (rhythmic, but atonal) (atonal, but
> 5 song oriented, rhythmic, tonal
> i'm just curious. i do both. right now i'm mainly working with some
> pretty freaky vocal stuff. a "1" from above. however, i have done lots
> guitar and bouzouki work that was very "musical" or "song oriented".
> sure this question has been brought up before, but the list changes all
> the time. also: why do you do what you do and what do you think of the
> other side of the coin?
The problem is that there's a LOT of space between 3 and 5. Things that are
harmonic and rhythemic, and yet, not "song oriented". Most of my looping
somewhere in there. I don't plan out songs, it's freely improvised, yet,
atonal, and it generally develops a rhythm, but it never ends up sounding
pop song, ABABCAB, or whatever.
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now