] [Thread Prev
Re: Voretex (was Re: good processor for weird sounds, etc.?)
Thanks to Todd & everyone else for responding. Sometimes the less stuff I
bring to a session to work with the more interesting sounds & loops
It is easy to get carried away with all the new hardware..
>From: Todd Pafford <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: Voretex (was Re: good processor for weird sounds, etc.?)
>Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 20:54:57 -0500
>On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Louis Rossi wrote:
> > I'm curious to know where vortex users position their unit..
> > Pre or Post Looping device? Mixer send, amp effects loop etc etc..
> > Cheers
> > Lou
>My guitar has two sets of pickups, so these two chains are running in
>Guitar (magnetic pickups) -> Compressor -> Distortion -> Vortex ->
>-> Mixer -> Amp
>Guitar (piezo pickups) -> Compressor -> Vortex -> Mixer -> Amp
>The benefit to putting the looper (essentially) last is that I can loop
>affected sounds, then lay down sounds affected in entirely different ways
>top. Granted it'd be nice to have some post-loop processing capabilities,
>but if I can only pick one, it'd have to be pre-loop.
>I really wish the Boomerang was stereo or that I could somehow link two
>together. My loops really miss the bright clean sound from the piezos,
>the mags give me more sonic possibilities so they get looped. I guess
>soon be time to graduate to and EDP or Repeater.
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.