[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: RC-300
I saw it at NAMM. Rico Loop demo-ed it for me... but he really knew very
little about the specifics and he didn't seem to want to discuss anything
with me.
it's interesting. I like the 3 separate stop/record/play thing... no more
selecting...
the effects seem interesting, although, no reverb... but you can choose
pre loop or post loop efx, which can make for some interesting things,
especially with the pitch function.
there's still no real click track sound and the guide track is still not
pannable so you still lose 2 outputs if you're using the click to send to
a drummer. I guess I didn't complain loud enough about those things
previously.
no more tap tempo button.... weird. So you have to have an external tap
tempo if you want to do that.
the exp pedal seems pretty useless. on the rc50 I am able to use an
external midi pedal to control the 'selected' loop's volume, which is VERY
handy... but now, there's no more selection, so that's gone...
no one knows if it syncs better to other devices or if the midi clock
output is actually stable now. I tried to send midi clock to a boss
metronome from my rc50 and the metronome couldn't follow it, too
unstable... wow... geniuses
I don't think I'm going to run out and buy one any time soon, but I would
like to mess with it more.
the new pigtronix looper seems really cool and different.
I know a lot of people who bought an RC300 hoping it would be a lot better
than the rc-50 and then sold it cause it wasn't enough of an improvement
over the RC-50.
by a lot I mean 3...
Teddy
>
> On 9 Feb 2012, at 05:03, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>> Has anyone that is familiar with the RC-50 tested the RC-300?
>> Joaquim
>
- References:
- RC-300
- From: Joaquim Carvalho <kanguru007@gmail.com>
- Re: RC-300
- From: Joaquim Carvalho <kanguru007@gmail.com>