[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Stacking Static Parts and 100% Feedback in live looping
In the books that have influenced your music thread, I talked about
really enjoying
Ashley Kahn's wonderful book on the making of 'Kind of Blue' by Miles
Davis.
Davis embraced modalism because it finally gave the soloist control
over determining harmony as opposed to the comping instruments or the
'tune'.
He felt that with Bop and Post Bop that the role of soloist had been
relegated to commenting on chordal changes that were laid down
by either the composition or by the chordal compers aesthetic
Later, he was the first person (to my knowledge) who used percussion
tape loops when he recorded 'In A Silent Way'.
He did this for the same reason: By not having to groove, the
percussionist was freed to comment more
and to be able to play more freely and creatively.
I realize that , for me, this is one of the most compelling reasons why
I love to do live looping:
As a minimalistic/pocket grooving drummer/percussionist...........one
who really loved the drumbeat much more than
the fills that people used to augment it (or to just get away from it's
tyranny), I felt liberated to
lay down a groove that gave me the freedom to do something else.
It liberated me to be far more creative and eventually led me to picking
up dozens of different melodic instruments to
see what I could get, naively, from them.
Looping can allow us to morph arrangements........to shift from very
conventional things to very unconventional approaches
or vice versa in the middle of a realtime composition.
Because I use a lot of feedback set to 100%, the stasis of parts is
able to morph precisely because of you put on top
of them subsequently.
I don't think my approach is better than anyone else's, however.
I see a lot of wonderful artists use variable feedback to create all
kinds of interesting morphings in their live looping work
(my brother, Matthias Grob, Andy Butler, Per Boysen, et. al.) but I
keep finding more and more things to do
just by using starkly naked loops that don't morph over time but that
are, through arrangement, recontextualized because of the
parts that end up on top of them.
The desire to escape boring oneself is a great motivator.
With the stasis of stacked parts coming from 100% feedback approaches
the emphasis necessarily falls on choosing new timbres, exploiting new
timbres from traditional sources and various forms
of analogue and digital processing before or after the loop.
It's funny, but I've actually thought about not taking expression pedals
for the LP-1 on my tour to specifically force myself
into more of a box that needs to be climbed out of.
I don't know.........perhaps I'll break down and bring them
Also, perhaps, I'll start learning some of those very cool approaches
that my brother has been using with variable
feedback replaces in his music after the tour.