[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: AW: OT: new Macbook wíthOUT Firewire :(
Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill wrote:
> Per, you wrote:
>
>
>>it fully sufficient. I would think different though if I was up to
>>making multi track recordings, as when recording twenty mic inputs at
>>one go. But for everything else FW 400 is as good as FW 800.
>
>
> I'm a little bit curious about this bandwidth issue for firewire when
>used
> for digital audio. Now if I understand this correctly, one of the big
> plusses of FireWire over, say, USB2, is that it works extremely well
> (meaning: low overhead) for streams.
>
> Now if we assume you record twenty mic inputs, and if we furthermore
>assume
> you record them in 24/96, then simple math gives us a data rate of 20
> (channels) * 96000 (samples per second) * 24 (bits per sample) = 44Mbit/s
> (rounded up). With a data rate of 400 MBit/s with FW400, this shouldn't
>be a
> problem? What am I missing here?
>
> Rainer
As far as I can briefly see - nothing more than maybe forgetting some
protocol packet overhead. This was approx the same conclusion on the
referred NG.
Not wanting to start a discussion about sample rate, but..
Again, on rec.audio.pro, it was mostly agreed that sample rates above
44.1 or 48 doesn't yield anything, other than you her the drive more ;)
I'll look for a link to that discussion..
Personally, I choose 48 Khz over 44.1 Khz for reasons that outboard gear
often use this clockrate, so interfacing/wordclock is easier, and
reportedly some plugins have issues with either slow/fast sample rate.
At these sample rates the math looks even nicer, so even if adding a few
overlooked speed/protocol issues, I'd say the ability to handle enough
simultaneous channels for at least a minor/home studio should be enough
- provided the maybe missing link is in place: that the actual
interfaces and drivers works as intended per the firewire specs, and the
PC/Mac interface sits in a well-designed chipset on a good mobo.
I guess everyone knows about inadequite/crappy interfaces/drivers..
--
rgds,
van Sinn