[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: conversations threading IMPORTANT
On 11 okt 2007, at 09.29, Claude Voit wrote:
> somewhere in the message header are some nb/codes that make the
> conversation tree understandable by the email client and organizes
> the display in our respective mail client.
This is something I have not heard of? No email system I have been
using works like that (MS Windows Office Outlook, Outlook Express,
Eudora, MS Entourage for Mac, Apple Mail, online web browser
dependent G-Mail, online web browser PHP system Squirrel). When
sorting according to Subject (equalling "thread") the function is
based on alphabetical order, leaving out those short abbreviations
typically added by the email client, as "Re", "RE", "FW" etc.
> SO when you take the last message you recieved and just delete the
> text and subjects and then enter your fantastic new subject about
> whatever, you still continue the same old conversation because the
> threading code is still the same and doesnt care you changed
> subject from apples to terrorism.
> the reason I'm complaining is this fucks up the archive and burries
> great conversations in obscure subjects and vice-versa
Ouch... getting that mustn't be fun. I would be interested in hearing
about email systems that supports such "nb threading code"?
Greetings from Sweden
Per Boysen
www.boysen.se (Swedish)
www.looproom.com (international)