[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: WG: Reply-to setting
Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill wrote:
> For me, the only reason to use Reply-to is when I'm writing from an email
> account but want replies to go to another account (e.g. writing from work
> and wanting the replies sent to my private email address).
>
> Rainer
I can confirm this (I run email services for my web hosting customers).
No need to set a reply address unless you need to use a different
address to receive replies than your Mail From address.
Thanks for changing that setting Krispen. I didn't notice yesterday when
my message went to you instead of the list. Also thanks for reposting
the relevant part.
As for the list software, I don't know why it doesn't already do this,
but I think that it should replace any existing Reply-to: header with
the list address. Not doing so is a hassle and the software should be
able to do that. Of course that doesn't mean that it actually has that
feature (I don't know), I just think that it should.
Sorry for the Off Topic nature of this post. Hopefully now that we
understand a little better we can avoid this problem. BTW, I still
wonder what AW means in a subject line, and also this email has WG: in
the subject. What does that mean?
Peace,
- Sam
- Follow-Ups:
- OT: AW: WG:
- From: "Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill" <rs@moinlabs.de>