[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: RC-50 FEEDBACK WORKS
//Really at this point why bother monkeying around with
the RC-20 when a used Repeater can be purchased with
is's own flawed OS?//
It's the RC-50 I believe you're referring to? A disadvantage of using the
Repeater is that of its hardware reliability, IMHO compared to the RC-50.
Also, the RC-50 doesn't need a Behringer MIDI pedal (and the programming)
needed to control it.
The argument about feedback seems to be like someone complaining that a
automobile is useless because it doesn't have a truckbed. So what? Many
folks don't need a truckbed (or feedback).
--
Paul Richards
---- mark sottilaro <zerocrossing2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I agree. As much as I wanted to love the RC-20 for
> it's form factor alone, I want to find someone at
> Roland and punch them for not bothering to include
> what a lot of people consider base functionality.
>
> Really at this point why bother monkeying around with
> the RC-20 when a used Repeater can be purchased with
> is's own flawed OS? ;) The quirky Repeater still
> seems to be a better product than the RC-20 from what
> I can see. If you really need something on the floor
> you're probably better off with an Electro-Harmonix
> 2880, no?
>
> --- Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Seriously, that workaround is as arcane as roland's
> > O/S is to begin
> > with. It hasn't changed my mind about the flawwed
> > RC-50...
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>