[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: RC-50 FEEDBACK WORKS
I agree. As much as I wanted to love the RC-20 for
it's form factor alone, I want to find someone at
Roland and punch them for not bothering to include
what a lot of people consider base functionality.
Really at this point why bother monkeying around with
the RC-20 when a used Repeater can be purchased with
is's own flawed OS? ;) The quirky Repeater still
seems to be a better product than the RC-20 from what
I can see. If you really need something on the floor
you're probably better off with an Electro-Harmonix
2880, no?
--- Charles Zwicky <cazwicky@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> Seriously, that workaround is as arcane as roland's
> O/S is to begin
> with. It hasn't changed my mind about the flawwed
> RC-50...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com