[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: RC-50 Fade Out
daniel brothier wrote about lexicon feedback
When and what i listen with feedback with the pcm 80, it's when the sound
continue to grow on the loop and definitlly alter and change the sound
all
along the duration.
I must control the volume land the input level of the incoming signal with
a
volume pédal.
Sometimes the pcm don't like it at all, so i must reinstall everything,
but
it's rare.
And there's a kind of pretty and dirty feedback physical distortion.
Each machine has his her own feedback ?
>From: Bill Fox <billyfox@soundscapes.us>
>Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
>Subject: Re: RC-50 Fade Out
>Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:02:00 -0500
>
>Kim Flint wrote:
>
>>At 01:51 AM 2/18/2006, rob cathcart wrote:
>>
>>>What makes us think that the RC-50 will not fade loops out?
>>
>>The question is not whether it has the ability to "fade loops out". The
>>RC-50 does appear to have that function.
>>The question is whether it has feedback control, which is far more
>>musically useful with looping. The RC-50 does not appear to have
>feedback
>>control, but we need somebody to try it to find out for sure.
>>It is very clear that Roland so far has not understood the distinction
>>between the two.
>
>Perhaps I'm a bit dense. I totally understand the concept of feedback in
>the world of delay units. Without feedback, a delay happens only once.
>With feedback of less than unity gain, there are repeats that decay over
>time. With feedback at unity gain, you have a delayed signal repeats
>forever... like a loop. With feedback greater than unity gain, the
>volume
>builds up on each repetition. But a loop, by any definition I know,
>doesn't need any feedback in order to, um, loop ad infintitum. Being the
>owner of only a Boss RC-20 and an Akai Headrush, what am I not
>understanding? In the world of looping, what is the purpose of feedback?
>
>A tape loop does not have feedback. It is a length of tape that has been
>spliced into a loop and plays as long as you desire. It will not change
>in
>volume over time. Perhaps loopers such as EDP, etc. are different than
>the
>tape loop analogy and are closer to the delay concept, à la three head
>tape
>machines, analog and digital delays? Thus making the looper appellation
>a
>slight (but not total) misnomer?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bill
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Hotmail : créez votre adresse e-mail gratuite & à vie !
http://www.imagine-msn.com/hotmail/default.aspx?locale=fr-fr