[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
livelooping.com
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 12:33 pm, John Tidwell wrote:
> --- Stuart Wyatt <loopersdelight@solostring.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Live looping is *NOT* a style of music, it is way to
>> create music...
>
> Kim knows this. We know this. BUT.....
>
> http://www.livelooping.com/
>
> this seems to say something different.
To quote the site:
> Welcome to Live Looping Music!
> Here we will show to public, press and artists:
>
> - what this new music is like
It is a relatively new style of music... so this is fine. They are
going to give examples of the diversity of live looping.
> - where the fascination of looping comes from
This seems ok...
> - why its so different to create loops in real time
Creating loops in realtime is what live looping is all about... what is
the problem here?
> - how you can learn it
We/they want to share their tricks and ideas.... again, what is the
problem?
> - where such events took and will take place
Great. A gig list... again - is this bad?
> - which musicians are making success with this music
Rick is one person. Per is another... Mathias and myself.... as well as
many others. All are live loopers who are making a career of sorts
through live looping.
> A group of about 10 skilled musicians, poets and visual artists are
> about to create this new site
10 people have shown an interest in creating the site. That does not
mean that the site will be limited to just those 10 musicians.
> If you think you may be interested, please come back here in a month
> or two
> or go to Loopers-Delight.com , the meeting point of such musicians.
A reference to loopers delight. Live looping wants to live in harmony
with LD. Is there anything bad in this?
> If you are interested in contributing, please mail to:
> info@LiveLooping.com
>
> Geoff Smith's LiveLooping Research Paper
> Sunao Inami's LiveLooping Web Radio
I really cannot see what is wrong with this? Maybe someone can
enlighten me.