[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
RE: Repeater spotted for sale
Thanks for the note back, Rainer, although I'd politely disagree with your
assertion that it's "not much of a help". ;)
In fact, I believe that in many instances I'd use the Repeater just as you
are. But since I was a little vague in my previous description, let me go
into a bit more detail.
I figured out a long time ago that I seem to base almost everything I do
off some sort of ostinato, some set of repeating patterns. The interest
for me comes in the interaction between the different parts, and in their
evolution/de-evolution in relation to each other.
Now I'm also a synth junkie -- can't help it, I've always loved 'em. And
this whole episode started when I decided to pare down my system to just a
laptop setup. Since there were a few hardware modules I really didn't
want
to do without, I decided to supplement with a small portable rack (which,
if I add the Repeater, is now up to a 12-space -- small and portable my
@$#!). :P
With the new system, I can do just about anything I need to do as far as
sequences and their manipulations. I've got enough gear to handle that in
realtime. But, as I'm sure you'll agree, locking into a sequencer tends
to
turn a performance into an artifact rather than an experience. If I
wanted, I could probably set everything up onstage, press play, and go
home
for the evening. That's not what I'm looking for. I've still got some
constraints I've put upon myself. I've got to establish an underlying
beat/pulse, for instance, but over the top of that I'm looking for
something a bit more organic.
As I was looking for a method to get around this dilemma, I began
remembering the recordings of those early tape loop experiments from
people
such as Eno & Fripp and Steve Reich, amongst others. It wasn't just the
juxtaposition of the different parts that was interesting, but also the
way
in which the older parts gradually degraded as new ones were put down over
the top of them. That was one of the things that originally attracted me
to the Echo Pro, with its models of the old tape and platter looping
devices.
So, getting back to the Repeater, if it were nothing more than a realtime
digital 4-track, then you're correct -- it wouldn't be of much use to me
in
this setup. But, reading through some of your other comments (as well as
once again going through Mark Sottilaro's review on the website) leads me
to believe that there are indeed some rather interesting ways to not only
layer, but also to "decompose" your loops. Would I be correct in saying
that?
My original inclination was to see if I could simply "cheap out" and get
the Echo Pro to accomplish some of the things I needed it to. But I'm
beginning to think that the Repeater may actually be a bit more viable
option for going about this. For instance, I've got an old Korg Kaos pad
that I hadn't planned on integrating into my rig, but the effects loop on
the Repeater seems the perfect place for it. Also, I've got a few synths
that I love dearly (Prophet VS, Kawaii K5k) that I will just not take out
of the house for fear of something happening to them. Because the
Repeater
can save data in a nonvolatile format, I could record synth clusters as
loops instead of sampling them into the computer, then play them back
repitched via MIDI. Neat!
I think I'm leaning toward springing the bucks for one of these, but I'm
still open to arguments pro or con if you (or anybody else) has any more
feedback.
Thanks again for your thoughts, Rainer!
-c-
At 12:17 AM 8/26/2002 +0200, Rainer Straschill wrote:
>Hi -c-,
>
>I don't know if I really do understand what you want/need to do with a
>looper, but let me put it this way: for creating weird sonic textures, the
>Repeater might not be the best thing you could get. If in your synth-only
>setup, polyphonic loops can be covered by the pattern sequencers of your
>other devices, a Repeater with its great feature of realtime
>pitch-shift/time compression and of four separate tracks is of little
>use. I
>do not have a EDP myself, so my scope on its functions vs a Repeater is
>somewhat limited to what I heard from other people; I do however know
>that I
>do lots of stuff with the Repeater which are impossible both with a Line6
>EchoPro and an EDP - mainly for the fourtrack stuff, which I do use all
>the
>time, and which involves recording effected synth parts and syncing them
>to
>a running pattern sequencer (not the other way round, though, for reasons
>amply covered onlist in recent times). If I would be faced with the
>decision
>to either get an EDP or a Repeater for use in a synth-only setup with lots
>of pattern sequencers which allow for great realtime work, I'd most
>probably
>opt for the EDP. And I still make heavy use of my DL4, though not as a
>looper, but for its delay effects (although I started to replicate some of
>its effects using a FireworX).
>
>I use the Repeater mostly for "acoustic" instruments, so I do not really
>know if my heavy use of it would apply to your use - most of my synth
>basses
>are actually Vbasses, looped with a repeater. I couldn't do most of the
>music I play today without a Repeater - on the other hand, I did great
>stuff
>back when my only loopers were a DL4 and a Headrush...
>
>Why have both (or three of them): The Repeater can do things the Echoplex
>can't do, and even four Echoplexes can't do. The EDP can do things the
>Repeater can't do. The DL4 (or EchoPro) can't to anything the EDP or
>Repeater can't do loopwise, and it can't do a lot of things which are
>regarded a must for a "serious" looper (like MIDI-syncing, variable
>feedback,...) - but it is a great tool for its delay models, and the
>looper
>is a nice addition to the repertoire
>
> Rainer
>
>(sorry for being not much of a help)
>
>Rainer Straschill
>Moinlabs GFX and Soundworks - www.moinlabs.de
>digital penis expert group - www.dpeg.de
>The MoinSound Archives - www.mp3.com/moinlabs
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Catilyne [mailto:catilyne@icicle.net]
> > Sent: Sonntag, 25. August 2002 23:21
> > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> > Subject: Re: Repeater spotted for sale
> >
> >
> > At 10:02 AM 8/25/2002 -0700, Mark Hamburg wrote:
> > >Sylvan Music in Santa Cruz.
> > >
> > >They want $629, however, which puts it within spitting
> > distance of yet
> > >another Echoplex and is now twice the price of a Line6 Echo Pro.
> > >
> > >People keep saying that one should have both. Why?
> >
> > Yep, I'm in a similar circumstance. I've got a line on a
> > Repeater but I'm
> > really torn as to whether to follow through on it. (I'd
> > *really* like to
> > thank Mark Sottilaro for his insightful comments, by the way.)
> >
> > I don't consider myself a looper in the strictest sense of
> > the word. I'm
> > trying to put together a setup (all synthesizers, no acoustic
> > instruments)
> > that will allow me to put Frippertronics-type space ambience
> > over the top
> > of techno breakbeats. For that reason, I was originally
> > thinking about
> > getting an Echo Pro, then possibly moving up to an EDP later
> > if I really
> > got into looping.
> >
> > But now I'm faced with the dilemma regarding the Repeater of
> > "get it now or
> > forever hold your peace". <*sigh*>
> >
> > So, for those of you with Repeaters doing electronica, I'd
> > just like to
> > ask: Is it really 'all that', or am I just getting caught up
> > with gearlust
> > and engaging in overkill...?
> >
> > TIA!!!
> >
> > -c-
> >
> > _____
> > "i want to reach my hand into the dark and *feel* what reaches back"
> > -recoil
> >
> >