[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #75
stop sending me shit!!!!!!!!
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 13:53:16 -0500, Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 00 : Issue
>75
>
> Today's Topics:
> Not Interesting... [ "David Potter"
<papadave55@hotmail. ]
> Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #73 [ "Larry Tremblay"
<ltct@concentric.n ]
> Re: dl4 = midi [ "b.knox"
<b.knox@latrobe.edu.au> ]
> Re: dl4 = midi [ George Van Wagner
<vanwag@earthlink ]
> Re: dl4 = midi [ Rich <rich@nuvision.com> ]
> Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #74 [ KRosser414@aol.com ]
> Re: Interesting... [ dan mcmullen <dog@well.com> ]
> Re: OT (or maybe not) National Endow [ Hawkeye255@aol.com ]
> Re: re Ineresting... [ Hawkeye255@aol.com ]
> Re: mpx1 vs. mpx 500 [ SoundFNR@aol.com ]
>
> Administrivia:
> Looper's Delight
> ****************
>
> Please send posts to:
>
> Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
>
> Don't send them to the digest!
>
> To subscribe/unsubscribe to the Loopers-Delight digest version, send
email
> with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body,
with no
> signature files, to:
>
> Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com
>
>
> To subscribe/unsubscribe to the real Loopers-Delight list, send email
> with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body,
with no
> signature files, to:
>
> Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com
>
>
> Check the web page for archives and lots of other goodies!
>
> http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html
>
>
> Your humble list maintainer,
>
> Kim Flint
> kflint@annihilist.com
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 06:37:15 PST
> From: "David Potter" <papadave55@hotmail.com>
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Not Interesting...
> Message-ID: <20000310143715.42567.qmail@hotmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.........................
>
> >From: "Larry Tremblay" <ltct@concentric.net>
> >Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> >To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
> >Subject: Re: Interesting...
> >Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:09:39 -0500
> >
> > >
> > > LOL. Yep, sure does. That was the point. I'm not *totally*
> > > insulated from the irony of my own statements, you know.
> > >
> > >
> > > ** okay. i guess the problem is that you come off that way . . .
while
> > > possibly not allowing others that latitude.
> >
> >I'm lightening up a bit. The slack it out.
> >
> > > True, there's no definitive "proof" per se, only shades of
> >understanding,
> > > given the complexity of the subject under study - the human brain.
>;)
> > >
> > > ** or the universe? i think that it may be easier to understand the
> >human
> > > brain that it is the universe around us . . .
> >
> >Hard to say really. The brain is a 3-pound universe all its own.
> >At least the universe is 'out there' for us to study, whereas the
> >study of the brain is a seriously recursive [like looping] and
> >unimaginably complex endeavor. Not uncrackable, but difficult, to
> >say the least.
> >
> > > by the way, have you noticed how string theory seems to be
approaching
> >some
> > > of the mystical traditions? i also seem to recall that many
physicists
> >have
> > > been ardently religious . . . (not that i am, mind you)
> >
> >Yes, I've read and studied most of the literature on the subject of
> >Super-string theory (or so-called 'theory of everything'), and it
> >appears to approximate (at times) the mystical speculations of a
> >'hidden reality' or 'other planes of existence'-type stuff.
> >
> >The jury is most definitely out on that one. The magnitude of the
> >gulf between matter at the sub-atomic particle level versus what
> >we experience our own macro-atomic (i.e., molecular) level is vast
> >indeed. It's almost like two different worlds - and for all practical
> >purposes, they are.
> >
> >As I understand it, quantum events have no "real" effect at the macro
> >level due to the strong forces of the molecules that make up our bodies
> >and the 'hard matter' world around us. Otherwise, things would be
>flying
> >apart all over the place. (Given there was a place to begin with.)
> >
> >True, *some* scientists are religious, but most are either agnostic or
> >devote atheists like Carl Sagan and Einstein (despite his protests
>about
> >not believing that "God plays dice", in regards to Quantum Mechanics).
> >
> >The great thing about science versus religion is that the future is
> >always open, and that all theories must continually hold up under
> >intense scrutinity. On the otherhand, religion is a closed book,
> >it's dogma rarely (if ever) open to questioning and revision.
> >
> >- Larry
> >
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:43:19 -0500
> From: "Larry Tremblay" <ltct@concentric.net>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
> Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #73
> Message-ID: <002f01bf8a9e$fb792670$7c310140@concentric.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> > There is no clash between thought and feeling, any apparent
> > clash betwwen the two iis really a clash between two
> > contradicting ideas. So, if you have a feeling that seems
> > irrational, it's really your ideas that are irrational.
>
> Thanks Dan. I couldn't have said it better. Ayn Rand's
> philosophy has had a great influence on my own thinking,
> too. Her essay, "Art and Cognition" in her book "The
> Romantic Manifesto" is what led me to Helmholtz, and
> subsequently, a whole new world of music and aesthetics.
>
> - Larry
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Koontz" <DanKoontz@webtv.net>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 6:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #73
>
>
> > First of all, rationality and irrationality are mutually exclusive.
>You
> > either choose to validate your ideas (through a process of reason),and
> > be rational; or choose to follow whatever makes you feel good and is
> > conveniant. The senses (percepts) are valid, they are automatic
> > reactions to the external world. Your senses never lie, the error
occurs
> > when a person takes percepts and forms incorrect (invalid) concepts. A
> > good example of this would be the illusion of the broken-stick in
water.
> > The senses are totaly reliable in that they don't censor the light
> > coming to your eyes at different speeds. I you were to conclude that
the
> > stick was really bent, that would be an error of thought (conceptual),
> > not yor senses (perceptual). Love is not an "irrational feeling".
Love,
> > like all feelings or emotions are a value judgement formed by one's
> > ideas. All emotions derive from the content of one's mind. If you won
a
> > million dollars, would you feel happy, or sad and dejected? You would
> > feel happy, because those million dollars would be of value to you.
> > There is no clash between thought and feeling, any apparent clash
> > betwwen the two iis really a clash between two contradicting ideas.
>So,
> > if you have a feeling that seems irrational, it's really your ideas
that
> > are irrational. I strongly suggest you look into Objectivism, the
> > philosophy of Ayn Rand.
> >
> > Cheers, - Dan
> >
> >
> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 02:44:11 +1100
> From: "b.knox" <b.knox@latrobe.edu.au>
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: dl4 = midi
> Message-ID: <38C9184B.1E8D940D@latrobe.edu.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Dan Koontz wrote:
> >
> > I heard about someone thinking about modifying a dl4. A suggestion I
> > would have is to try circuit-bending it. If you're not familiar with
> > this, go to your favorite search engine and look up "Reed Ghazala", or
> > "circuit bending". I've modified lots of cheap toys using this and
>have
> > come upon some amaaazing sounds!
> > Hope this is could beof some value to you,
> > - Dan
>
> hi Dan,
>
> on the subject on circuit bending ... just picked up a ye olde mattel(!)
> synsonics drum machine ... molto fun as is, but has this been a cheap
> toy you've bent? any pointers?
>
> lurv that white noise "cymbal" sound :)
>
> brad
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:58:21 -0800
> From: George Van Wagner <vanwag@earthlink.net>
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: dl4 = midi
> Message-ID: <38C91B9B.F9EFA3B3@earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Remember that pretty much everything that's going on in the DL4 is
> happening in the digital world, and the signal goes directly from the
> DAC to the output op amp, so, as interesting as Reed's 'anti-theory' is,
> I don't think you'll make much headway on this particular piece of gear.
>
> George
>
> Dan Koontz wrote:
> >
> > I heard about someone thinking about modifying a dl4. A suggestion I
> > would have is to try circuit-bending it. If you're not familiar with
> > this, go to your favorite search engine and look up "Reed Ghazala", or
> > "circuit bending". I've modified lots of cheap toys using this and
>have
> > come upon some amaaazing sounds!
> > Hope this is could beof some value to you,
> > - Dan
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:06:35 -0800
> From: Rich <rich@nuvision.com>
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: dl4 = midi
> Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000310080635.008bea40@pop3.argotech.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I'm definitely not the guy to say yes or no to such a proposition, since
i
> am definitely an end 'user'. However, since Line6's POD, AX2 and (i
> believe) the Flextone all have pretty good midi implementation, why
>would
> they not include midi capability to the DL4 if it was so easy?
> Furthermore, you're suggesting that it would be easy to MODIFY the unit?
> Sounds kinda fishy to me...
>
> For $250, my little green box works just fine...
>
> rich
>
>
> At 05:33 PM 3/9/00 PST, you wrote:
> >
> >loopers !
> >
> >i don't know if anyone did or not talked about the idea of modifying
> >the dl4, but it sure sounds like a danm good idea.
> >two main reasones:
> >
> >just before reading that please forgive me for my poor level and
> >knoowledge in electronics...(i am doing my best thugh to keep up with
> >it)
> >
> >1.
> >the fact that the unit has so many tweekning and tweazing
> >possibilites and also 3 presets and a tap makes a bit of a conflict...
> >assuming the optimal situation in which you can take the maximum
> >advantage of the unit's flexabiliety ;
> >
> >a. the units on the flore
> >it seems like the 1 expression pedal output is limiting,so you can't
> >make small adjustment while playing but us the pedal like you use the
> >wah
> >b. or it's on a table so in order to tweek,you must stop stop playing.
> >
> >2.midi clock both in loop and delay mode
> >
> >basicly we're just talking about converting swiches and potentiometers
> >to midi,shouldnt be so hard ...
> >
> >for the quality of the delay and other effects it may be interesting
> >to go even further and assign different alogarithem to control
> >velocities and other characters normaly being tweeked.
> >
> >i think about a kind of seperated midi agent device that converts
> >midi clock to on\off and alogarithems\signals to level
(potentiometers)
> >controls all these units.
> >anyways, since midi technology is so accesible these days,
> >it seems logical that there sould be some way to enable musican to
> >convert their old analog devices to be controled vie digital interface.
> >we're at the age of midi control.
> >actualy its not a bad idea to start a kind of a business...
> >like maybe do it yourself...
> >
> >-why wait for futher upgrades in the program if you can modify it
> >by yourself?
> >-why buy the modulation modeler if you can convert your analog devices
> >to be controled via midi?
> >-whats wrong in connecting analog technology with the opertunities of
> >digital accurat control?
> >
> >looper, feel free to enrich use with your well appriciated knowlede,
> >experience and ideas.
> >
> >am0as ;9)-
> >
> >______________________________________________________
> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:07:59 EST
> From: KRosser414@aol.com
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V00 #74
> Message-ID: <ca.2a2ad0a.25fa77df@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> In a message dated 3/10/00 7:24:43 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com writes:
>
> << So,
> if you have a feeling that seems irrational, it's really your ideas
>that
> are irrational. I strongly suggest you look into Objectivism, the
> philosophy of Ayn Rand. >>
>
> I had plenty of psudeo-intellectual acquaintences in college, including
>a
> particularly irritating ex-girlfriend (so there's my subjective
angle...),
> that constantly trumpeted the philosophy and "genius" of Ayn Rand.
>These
> people all confused their ego with "rationality" and delighted on
>sitting
> around and stroking it ad nauseum. I gave it a shot, but I thought
>then,
and
> think now, that it's not only utter garbage but intellectually
>cowardly.
I'm
> not going to claim to have read everything by Ayn Rand, but I feel about
it
> like I feel about eating fried pork chops: if you like it and have no
> trouble digesting it, good for you, but I didn't see the point in going
any
> further than one or two once my stomach was aching.
>
> If you get something meaningful from it, and I mean this sincerely,
>more
> power to you. But like the more over-zealous followers of any of these
> religions you find so offensive, you're making a mistake if you think
>it
> applies to anyone's reality but your own.
>
> IMHO, of course, and as off-topic as ever,
> Ken R
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 08:35:38 -0800
> From: dan mcmullen <dog@well.com>
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: Interesting...
> Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000310083538.00b39970@mail.well.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> At 02:14 PM 3/10/00 +0000, johnmcc@aldiscon.ie wrote:
> >[Larry:]
> >> On the otherhand, religion is a closed book, it's dogma
> >> rarely (if ever) open to questioning and revision.
> >
> >Yep, and a pity .. I've often felt that there may be more to be gained
from
> >understanding the questions than from the possible answer ..
>
> would it be more accurate to say "religion, *as often promoted by
>western
> religions instututions*, is a closed book"? i believe religion *can*
(and
> should?) be open to questioning and revision.
>
> thanks to all for their contributions to this fascinating thread,
> dan
> ___
> dan mcmullen, ca, usa don't worry - pay attention
> mailto:dog@well.com 707-485-0220
> pgp fingerprint = 1C70 8D81 6B94 93A9 F2D8 9609 2122 BF70 8619 EDAF
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:45:48 EST
> From: Hawkeye255@aol.com
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: OT (or maybe not) National Endowment of the Arts...
> Message-ID: <92.26a31b5.25fa80bc@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Subject: NPR & PBS Funding
>
> On NPR's Morning Edition, Nina Totenberg reported that if the Supreme
> Court supports Congress to cut the budget of the National Endowment of
> the Arts, it is in effect the end of NEA. This situation creates great
> concerns about Congressional funding for creative arts in America,
>since
>
> NEA provides major support for NPR (National Public Radio), PBS (Public
> Broadcasting System), and numerous other creative and performing arts.
> If NEA is lost or weakened, our lives will be similarly diminished. In
> spite of the efforts of each station to reduce spending costs and
> streamline their services, some government officials believe that the
> funding currently going to these programs is too large a portion of
> funding for something which is seen as not worthwhile.
>
> Currently, taxes from the general public for PBS equal $1.12 per person
> per year, and the National Endowment for the Arts equals $.64 a year. A
> January 1995 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll indicated that 76% of Americans
> wish to keep funding for PBS, third only to national defense and law
> enforcement as the most valuable programs for federal funding.
>
> Please add your name to this list and forward it to friends that you
> believe are in favor of what this stands for. The full list will be
> forwarded to the President of the United States, the Vice President,
>and
>
> the Speaker of the House, whose office has in the past been the
> instigator of the action to cut funding to these worthwhile programs.
> This petition is being passed around the Internet. Please add your name
> to it so that funding can be maintained for the NEA, NPR, and PBS.
> THIS IS OUR CHANCE TO MAKE INTERNET TECHNOLOGY WORK AS A VOICE IN OUR
> DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM. IT'S EASIER THAN EVER TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD.
>
> Please keep the petition rolling. Do not reply to me. Sign your name
>and
>
> locale to the list and forward it to others to sign. If you prefer not
> to, please send the list to the email address given below. This is
>being
>
> forwarded to numerous people at once to add their names to the
>petition.
>
> It won't matter if many people receive the same list, as the names are
> being managed.
>
> This is for anyone who thinks NPR and PBS deserve $1.12/year of their
> taxes. If you sign, please forward the list to others. If not, please
> don't kill it. If you happen to be the 150th, 200th, 250th, etc.,
>signer
>
> of this petition, please forward a copy to:
> wein2688@blue.univnorthco.edu This way we can keep track of the lists
> and organize them. Forward this to everyone you know, and help us to
> keep these programs alive. Thank you.
>
> IMPORTANT NOTE: It is preferable that you COPY the entirety of this
> letter and then PASTE it into a NEW outgoing message, rather than
>simply
>
> forwarding it. In your new outgoing message, add your name to the
> bottom of the list, then send it on. Or, if the option is available, do
> a SEND AGAIN.
>
> 1. David Liberman, Sylva, NC
> 2. Marie Harrison, Sylva, NC
> 3. Randi Beckmann, Ithaca, NY
> 4. Bill Wertheim, Mt. Vernon, NY
> 5. Marlene Wertheim, Mt. Vernon, NY
> 6. George Wertheim, San Francisco, CA.
> 7. Linda Wertheim, San Francisco, CA
> 8. Linda R. Semi, Walnut Creek, CA
> 9. Margaret C. Forness, Pleasant Hill, CA
> 10. Phillip D. Rubenstein, Syracuse, NY
> 11. Timothy J. Connell, Madison, WI
> 12. Stacia E. Jesner, Mt. Kisco, NY
> 13. Jenna Schnuer, NYC, NY
> 14. Julia Kohn, NY, NY
> 15. Maria Sarro, NY, NY
> 16. Evan Schwartz, Cliffside Park, NJ
> 17. Pat Waters, Lakewood, CO
> 19. Karen Tilton, Maquoketa, IA
> 20. Kent Crawford
> 21. Terry Dillon
> 22. Gene Bechen, Coralville, IA
> 23. Neal Schnoor, Kearney, NE
> 24. Sam Zitek, Crete, NE
> 25. Jay Kloecker
> 26. Marilyn Godby, Papillion, NE
> 27. Lucina Johnson
> 28. Alfred Tom Johnson
> 29. Tyler Corey Johnson
> 30. A. Corey Limbach
> 31. Paula Smith, Berkeley, CA
> 32. Pat Quinn, Alameda, CA
> 33. Andrea Quinn, Alameda, CA
> 34. Jerry Hackett, Berkeley, CA
> 35. Richard Hackett, NY
> 36. Jeffrey Green, CA
> 37. Phil Chernin, CA
> 38. Sandra S. Bauer, CA
> 39. Gregory LeVasseur, San Francisco, CA
> 40. Keiko LeVasseur, San Francisco, CA
> 41. Diego Gonzalez, San Francisco, CA
> 42. David D. Berkowitz, Washington, DC
> 43. Peter Glass, Bellevue, WA
> 44. Mary Frances Rimpini, Kent, WA
> 45. Mary Frances Stevens, Kirkland, WA
> 46. Linda Grebmeier, Benicia, CA
> 47. Lee Altman, Benicia, CA
> 48. Jeffrey Gray, South Orange, NJ
> 49. Ed Jones, Orange, NJ
> 50. Daniel P. Jones, Glenside, PA
> 51. Jenifer Goetz, State College, PA
> 52. Arnold R. Post, Carrboro, NC
> 53. Anna E. Post, Carrboro, NC
> 54. Robert A. Post, Cape May, NJ
> 55. Evelyn M. Post, Cape May, NJ
> 56. Jay A. Sklaroff, Philadelphia, PA
> 57. Harry M. Sklaroff, Washington, DC
> 58. Susan E. Salmons, Washington, DC
> 59. Dori Langevin, Silver Spring, MD
> 60. Ted Langevin, Silver Spring, MD
> 61. David Mercier, Easton, MD
> 62. Phoebe Harding, Baltimore, MD
> 63. Molly Rath, Baltimore, MD
> 64. Terry O'Hara, Baltimore, MD
> 65. Nina Wendt, Baltimore, MD
> 66. Marilyn Clark, Baltimore, MD
> 67. Cathy McKinney, Boone, NC
> 68. Harold McKinney, Boone, NC
> 69. Milena Garcia, Columbia, MD
> 70. Timothy Morrison, Devore, CA
> 71. Virginia S. Kallay Cleveland, OH
> 72. Nancy Cleaveland, Atlanta, GA
> 73. Cindy Lutenbacher, Decatur, GA
> 74. Kaye Norton, Columbus, OH
> 75. Elaine Haidt, Chapel Hill, NC
> 76. Frank Church, Chapel Hill, NC
> 77. Astrid R. Jarzembowski, Garrison, NY
> 78. David Church, Garrison, NY
> 79. Cathy Dillon, Old Greenwich, CT
> 80. Michelle Woodward, Town of Mt.Pleasant, NY
> 81. Catherine L. Josset, Brewster, NY
> 82. Bill Philbrick, Crompond, NY
> 83. Emile Menasch=BB, Mahopac, NY
> 84. Amy Menasch=BB, Mahopac, NY
> 85. Bette-Jane Crigger, Peekskill, NY
> 86. Miriam Piven Cotler
> 87. Cyndi Menegaz, Los Angeles, CA
> 88. Linda Zale, Los Angeles, CA
> 89. Phillip Kudelka, Woodland Hills, California
> 90. Karl Schoenbaum, Woodland Hills, California
> 91. Jennifer Bramscher, Malibu, CA
> 92. Mindy Markman, Los Angeles, CA
> 93. Bekki Misiorowski, Los Angeles, CA
> 94. Robert A. Misiorowski, Los Angeles, CA
> 95. Elise B. Misiorowski, Los Angeles, CA
> 96. Andrea McShane, Los Angeles, CA
> 97. Judith Shechter
> 98. Gerald Shechter, Kansas City, Missouri
> 99. Joyce Williams, Kansas City, MO
> 100. Brad Harris, Kansas City, MO
> 101. Ken Krusi, Silverdale, WA.
> 102. Rus Shuler, Fort Mill, SC
> 103. Stacy Hammond, Fort Mill, SC
> 104. Sandy Whitaker, Charlotte, NC
> 105. Neely Dodge, NY, NY
> 106. E Schlosberg Boston, MA
> 107. K. Caswell, Ivoryton, CT
> 108. Jerome Russo, Pennington, NJ
> 109. Sarah Caguiat Borthwick, Brooklyn, NY
> 110. Carlos J. Caguiat,Saranac Lake, NY
> 111. Rick Dennis, Saranac Lake,NY
> 112. Claire M. Stahler, Lake Placid, NY
> 113. Carolyn Curwen, Lowell, MA
> 114. Alison E. Curwen, Ojai, CA
> 115. William A. Curwen, Ojai, CA
> 116. Rick Swan, Ojai, CA
> 117. Sonia Nordenson, Ojai, CA
> 118. Rebecca Plum, Ojai, CA
> 119. Mike Wilkerson Santa Barbara, CA.
> 120. Jose Zamora, Berkeley, CA
> 121. Amber Smock, Berkeley, CA
> 122. Kimberly Cunningham, Berkeley, CA.
> 123. Margot Hanson, Berkeley, CA
> 124. Sarah Church, Berkeley, CA
> 125. David Caeser, Berkeley, ca
> 126. Catherine Trimbur, Berkeley, CA
> 127. Lori Durbin, Oakland, Ca.
> 128. Bebo White, San Francisco, CA
> 129. Bruce Erickson, San Carlos, CA
> 130. Don Erickson, Chicago, IL
> 131. D. McCannon, Evanston IL
> 132. G. Militello, Chicago, IL
> 133. D. Wilson, New York, New York
> 134. Kathy Murphy, Champaign, IL
> 135. Cara L. Day, Champaign, IL
> 136. Ualtar G. O'Regan, San Francisco, CA
> 137. John C. Lester, Berkeley, CA
> 138. Sara Hensley, San Jose, CA
> 139. Paul Olguin, Pacifica, CA
> 140. Jill Gluck,, Los Angeles, CA
> 141. Millicent Alexander, Los Angeles, CA
> 142. Jayme Adelson-Goldstein, Northridge, CA
> 143. Sandra Brown, Sherman Oaks, CA
> 144. Roland A. Childs, Los Angeles, CA
> 145. Naomi Childs, Los Angeles, CA
> 146. Ken Coleman. Santa Fe, NM
> 147. John reynolds, Los Angeles CA
> 148. Nathan Smith, Los Angeles, CA
> 149. Gabriela Kohen, New York, NY
> 150. Geoff Boehm, New York, NY
> 151. Kermit Johns, New York NY
> 152. Able Billheimer, New York NY
> 153. Ann C. Horan, Summit, NJ
> 154. Mary P. Lechevalier, Morrisville, VT
> 155. Hubert A. Lechevalier, Morrisville, VT
> 156. Marilyn J. Jordan, Huntington Station, NY
> 157. Kay Bromberg, Roslyn Heights, NY
> 158. Michael O'Neill, Wainscott, NY
> 159. Janine Veto, NY
> 160. Lysbeth A. Marigold, East Hampton, NY
> 161. Adrienne Kitaeff, East Hampton, NY
> 162. Kelly Patton Brook, Newcastle, Me
> 163. Alexander Brook, Newcastle, Me
> 164. Joanna Steichen, Montauk, NY
> 165. Will Trinkle, Roanoke, VA
> 166. Sheila Lobel, Hollis, NY
> 167. Robert Werthman, Fairless Hills, PA
> 168. L.A. Parks Daloz
> 169. Sharon Daloz Parks
> 170. John de Cuevas
> 171. Bruce Baird Struminger, Ann Arbor, MI
> 172. Leonadi Ward, La Crescenta,CA
> 173. Tayria Ward, La Crescenta, CA
> 174. Kurt Hoelting, Clinton, WA
> 175. Sally Goodwin, Clinton, WA
> 176. Ross Chapin, Langley, WA
> 177. Linda Pruitt, Seattle, WA
> 178. Jim Soules, Seattle, WA
> 179. Joel Rogers, Seattle, WA
> 180. Tom Darden, Seattle, WA
> 181. Ellen Wallach, Seattle, WA
> 182. Karen Lane, Seattle, WA
> 183. Lynn Taylor, Mercer Island, WA
> 184. Collin Tong, Seattle, WA
> 185. Sara Robertson, Seattle,WA
> 186. Namji Steinemann, New York, NY
> 187. Grace Norman, New York, NY
> 188. Rebecca Straus, New York, NY
> 189. Gillian Tan, New York, NY
> 190. Katherine Lynn, Somerville, MA
> 191. Chris Herb, Madison, WI
> 192. Kim Herb, Madison, WI
> 193. Sarah Kilgour, Mogamimachi, Yamagata, Japan
> 194. Wm. E. Kilgour, Madison, Wi
> 195. Martha Kilgour, Madison, WI
> 196. Audrey Kupferberg, Amsterdam, NY
> 197. Rob Edelman, Amsterdam, NY
> 198. Judith M Kass, New York, NY
> 199. Milton Kass, New York, NY
> 200. Jack Eichenbaum, Flushing, NY
> 201. Lois M. Kahan, New York,NY
> 202. Hal Temkin, Highland Park, IL
> 203. Lois Sachs, Northfield, IL
> 204. John Sachs, Northfield, IL
> 205. Ellen Alter, Winnetka, IL
> 206. Michael Alter, Winnetka, IL
> 207. Margaret J. Tucker, Nashville, TN
> 208. Jud Phillips, Nashville, TN
> 209. Jane F. Osgerby, Nashville, TN
> 210. Derek B. Petrella, Nashville, TN
> 211. Kimberly M. Patterson, Wildwood Crest, NJ
> 212 Katie M Arnold, Savannah, GA
> 213. Matthew Arnold, Brooklyn NY
> 214. April Lange, W. Barnstable, MA
> 215. Ruth Benfield, Seattle, Wa
> 216. William R. Benfield, Seattle, Wa
> 217. Ashley Benfield, Seattle, Wa
> 218. Morgan Benfield, Seattle, Wa
> 219. Issen Powter, Gold Bar, WA
> 220. Michael B. Plumb. Lynnwood, WA
> 221. Norma L. Plumb, Lynnwood, WA
> 222. Jonnee Denton, Bothell, WA
> 223. Les Denton, Bothell, WA
> 224. Susan Marett, Port Townsend, WA
> 225. Robert Marett, Port Townsend, WA
> 226. Patricia J. Yearian Port Townsend, WA
> 227. Barbara Furlan, Seattle, WA
> 228. Walt S. Dimick, Portland, OR
> 229. Jennifer Meyers, Portland, OR
> 230. Sarah Sameh, Portland, OR
> 231. Eleanor Kittelson, St. Paul, MN
> 232. Jan O'Donnell, Mpls, MN
> 233. Rebecca Knittle, Saint Paul, MN
> 234. Peggy A. Wiesenberg, Boston, MA
> 235. Ann A. Fountain, Boston, MA
> 236. Gio Gaynor, Boston,MA
> 237. Lele Yu, Boston, MA
> 238. Rebecca Ennen, Cambridge, MA
> 239. Tova Goodman, Boston, MA
> 240. Dana Simmons-Greco, Boston, MA
> 241. Rory O'Connell, Boston, MA
> 242. Debbie Moiles, Oxford, MA
> 243. Barry Jones, Worcester, MA
> 244. Bob Spera, Worcester, MA
> 245. Linda Taylor, Sturbridge, MA
> 246. Patricia J. Downe, Worcester, MA
> 247. Carel Mulder, Worcester, MA
> 248. Barbara Harris, Cambridge, MA
> 249. Pamela Erdmann, Dublin,N.H.
> 250. Russell M. Keith, Dublin, N. H.
> 251. Ellen Balis, Cambridge, MA
> 252. Doug McLeod, Cambridge, MA
> 253. Susan Rubinroit, South Windsor CT
> 254. Ken Edelston, Belfast, ME
> 255. Susan Guthrie, Belfast, ME
> 256. Heidi N. Brugger, Freedom, ME
> 257. Patricia Clark, Unity, ME
> 258. Peggy Gannon, Palmyra, ME
> 259. Paul Lowe, Freeport, ME
> 260. Barbara Wilmer, VA
> 261. Ann Goette, VA
> 262. Susan Morikawa, VA
> 263. Kisti Beckwith, TX
> 264. Nathan Beckwith, TX
> 265. Michael Zeoli, TX
> 266. Kirsten Singler, TX
> 267. Jane Johnson, TX
> 268. Diana Peyton, TX
> 269. Tonya Edmond, St. Louis, MO
> 270. Sally Haywood, St. Louis, MO
> 271. Mary Jo Brauner, St. Louis, MO
> 272. Jim Herning, PhD, MSW--St. Louis, MO
> 273. Christie Huck, St. Louis, MO
> 274. Wilson Powell, St. Louis, MO
> 275. Connie Frisbee Houde
> 276. Frank Houde
> 277. Deb Cavanaugh, Albany, NY
> 278. Marjorie Shaefer, Southfield, MI
> 279. Blossom Kecskes, St.Clair Shores, MI
> 280. Jeanette Bezanson, Madison Hts, MI
> 281. Matthew Bezanson, Madison Hts, MI
> 282. Marlene Babb, Harper Woods, MI
> 283. Linda Liddicoatt, Harper Woods, MI
> 284. Janet White, Oxford, MI
> 285. Linda Lupo
> 286. Karen Moran, Plymouth, MI
> 287. David Drouillard, Carleton, MI
> 288. Brian Philbin, Redondo Beach, CA
> 289. Tom Nichols, La Habra, CA
> 290. Janet Bratton, La Habra, CA
> 291. Spencer Graves, Brea, CA
> 292. Jo Graves, Brea CA
> 293. Jim Crowley, Oxnard CA
> 294. Annelle Hazlett, Waimea, HI
> 295. Chuck Graybill, Hiawatha, IA
> 296. Norma Graybill, Hiawatha, IA
> 297. Richard Carroll, Marion, IA
> 298. Dorothy Carroll, Marion, IA
> 299. Daniel W. Adams, Cedar Rapids, IA
> 300. David W. Funk, Cedar Rapids, IA
> 301. Michael E. Maas, Cedar Rapids, IA
> 302. Gladyce M. Maas, Cedar Rapids, IA
> 303. Patty Ankrum, Mount Vernon, IA
> 304. Bill Reiter, Mount Vernon. IA
>
>
>
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:02:41 EST
> From: Hawkeye255@aol.com
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: re Ineresting...
> Message-ID: <6a.fe235c.25fa84b1@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> << ===The universe is more of a Mambo Jumbo.===
> so there.
>
> tch.tch.
> Christine Bard
> 0~>~<>~><~<>~<~0 >>
>
> I beg to differ...Tango Jumbo, I believe. Hah!!! So there!!!
> hawkeye
> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:20:16 EST
> From: SoundFNR@aol.com
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
> Subject: Re: mpx1 vs. mpx 500
> Message-ID: <da.1fd091c.25fa88d0@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> In a message dated 10/03/00 01:39:45 GMT Standard Time,
gripcode@hotmail.com
> writes:
>
> > in order to compare the 1 to the 500;
> >
> > the routing possibilities
> > - i've heard about problems with the mpx 1's pitch shifting taking to
> > much place in the well crafted 1's dual processors and memory.
> > does that mean nessesarily that the routing in the 1 is bad when i
>use
> > -the pitch or any orther effects?
> > -how many effect can i go through?
> > -are there any other effects taking to much place?
>
> Can't answer all your questions, try ghogan@lexicon.com
> ...and keep in mind that I haven't actually used either,
> I'm a MPX100 user who's researched them as a possible upgrade.
>
> >can i loop on the 500 and have my guitar playing through?
> yes
>
> >tremolo + rotation
> trems excellent
> rotations very good
> (can only be better than the MPX100)
>
> >pitch shift MPX1
> the fact this uses up processing power could be a sign it works well,
> ... the pitch on the MPX100 only works well on single note I/P
> possibly the MPX500 is the same.
>
> Basically I reckon the MPX1 is much more powerful than the 500,
> it belongs in a higher price bracket than the 500.
> ...but the 500 is newer (&cheaper)
>
> if the loop facility in the 500 is identical to the 100, then it may
> share the problems, I'd suggest you try out an infinite loop
> while receiving midi-clock and see if the signal degrades.
>
>
>
>
> Andy Butler
> Lexicon Vortex Database
> http://members.aol.com/soundfnr/vortex.htm
_______________________________________________________
Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
Visit http://freeworld.excite.com