------------------------------ Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 97 : Issue 113 Today's Topics: RE: The Echoplex/CE [ Kim Flint ] Re: The Echoplex upgrade arrives! [ Kim Flint ] Re: Let The Power Fall - EMS [ PainPete@aol.com ] Hey, I'm under Twenty-Fi....EEEEK!!! [ PainPete@aol.com ] Re: A couple of Responses [ KelRey@aol.com ] Re: Hey, I'm under Twenty-Fi....EEEE [ vajra1@mho.net (Robert Phelps) ] Re: The Echoplex upgrade arrives! [ Marzzz@aol.com ] Re: MIDI looping [ Marzzz@aol.com ] Re: The Echoplex upgrade arrives! [ Kim Flint ] Re: Hey, I'm under Twenty-Fi....EEEE [ The Man Himself ] Re: A couple of Responses [ "Stephen P. Goodman" ] Re: A couple of Responses [ jessekudler@juno.com (Jesse G Kudle ] Re: Let The Power Fall - EMS [ BlkSwan03@aol.com ] Age [ patrick@his.com (Patrick Smith) ] Re: Echoplex oddness check: Any volu [ matthias@bahianet.com.br (Matthias ] old is better than new? [ matthias@bahianet.com.br (Matthias ] Re: A couple of responses [ matthias@bahianet.com.br (Matthias ] MIDI looping on a Mac [ "Ott, John" ] Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V97 #10 [ Olivier Malhomme ] Re[2]: A couple of Responses [ miguel.barella@poyry.com.br (MAT) ] Re: Midi looping [ Olivier Malhomme ] Age (of Aquarius) [ Michael Peters ] Re: Age (of Aquarius) [ Kim Flint ] Administrivia: Looper's Delight **************** Please send posts to: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Don't send them to the digest! To subscribe/unsubscribe to the Loopers-Delight digest version, send email with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no signature files, to: Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com To subscribe/unsubscribe to the real Loopers-Delight list, send email with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no signature files, to: Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com Check the web page for archives and lots of other goodies! http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html Your humble list maintainer, Kim Flint kflint@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 18:23:14 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: RE: The Echoplex/CE Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 4:56 AM -0400 7/13/97, Michael Peters wrote: >the one thing that interests me most about the new Echoplex is: > >Will it carry the CE stamp necessary to import it to Europe, or not? I don't know what they are doing with CE. (software doesn't have much to do with it!) When I left Gibson there was a plan for how to get CE approval for the echoplex. I don't know if they have done that or not. I assume so, since they seem to be planning to export a lot of them there. You might want to ask them that directly. OB's customer service human is Dean Fouts >If Gibson are really dedicated to this new product, they will spend the >money and energy to get a CE stamp ... one would hope so.....they do have CE approval for all the rest of their product line, although that's not very challenging with Les Pauls. kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 18:35:09 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: The Echoplex upgrade arrives! Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 3:38 AM +0200 7/13/97, Claude Voit wrote: >But today earlyer I had a talk with Rolf Spuler one of the pioneers of >the Paradis Loop Delay (the grand father of the plex) and he told me >that Oberheim was'nt shipping at all for the two last years and that the >plex story was almost dead) Well, they didn't ship any to Rolf for the past two years, which is a sad story. They have definitely been shipping them for the past two years though, including shipments to europe. >Would Kim get us a litle more infos about the future distibution policy >of oberheim (there should be a serious backlog) >are some units going to arrive to us in europe before another long wait I have no involvement in Oberheim policies, you have to contact them to ask such questions. (We just license software.) I could tell them that a lot of folks in Europe would like to know more. They are planning shipments soon to European distributors, but I don't know any details. >If I found a used plex today is it worth the wait (hardware wise) The hardware is the same, sure.... >long live Aurisis Research > >and welcome the LoopIII V5.0 > >Claude Voit thanks! kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 22:12:36 -0400 (EDT) From: PainPete@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Let The Power Fall - EMS Message-ID: <970713221233_-592097013@emout11.mail.aol.com> Funny, I always thought SSOSFAGTIACAGWAP was largely sped-up spliced tape loops of Roger Waters acting like small jungle mammals. Could we both be right perhaps? In a message dated 97-07-13 15:35:54 EDT, you write: << Subj: Re: RE: Let The Power Fall - EMS Date: 97-07-13 15:35:54 EDT From: BlkSwan03@aol.com Resent-from: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Reply-to: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com In a message dated 7/13/97 5:23:32 PM, you wrote: <> With not one but two AKS's. Sorry I left them out. Didn't mean to. I think they had been messing with EMS stuff for a bit before "Dark Side". Roger's "Several Species of Small Furry Animals Gathered Together in a Cave and Grooving With A Pict" (which I assume everyone on this list is familiar with-off of "Ummagumma".) is done with vocals but I think it was set up with the AKS and the vocal parts were added on top. The reason I think that is because I once got the very same type of rythymic chant kind of sound off the AKS. It was very weird and another example of the unique qualities of this synth. Jim (Portland, OR) >> ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 22:21:25 -0400 (EDT) From: PainPete@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Hey, I'm under Twenty-Fi....EEEEK!!!!!! Message-ID: <970713222118_592376849@emout14.mail.aol.com> Last time I checked, I was under 25, but... (VRAP!!!!!!!) - Sudden look at the dashboard of life - Holy BeJezzuz! I turn fraggin' THIRTY in a few months? What the $%&# happened? Were is my wife, kids and minivan? Do I care yet? (I'm soooooo confused by this temporal existence...) Pete (looping my life away...) In a message dated 97-07-13 20:56:27 EDT, you write: << Subj: Re: A couple of Responses Date: 97-07-13 20:56:27 EDT From: Dpcoffin@aol.com Resent-from: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Reply-to: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com <> Jeez, geezer, that's a relief! >> ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 22:34:02 -0400 (EDT) From: KelRey@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: A couple of Responses Message-ID: <970713223354_1657187311@emout16.mail.aol.com> If you cant laff whats the point? That was great Kim LOL Kelly ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 20:49:34 +0100 From: vajra1@mho.net (Robert Phelps) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Hey, I'm under Twenty-Fi....EEEEK!!!!!! Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Last time I checked, I was under 25, but... (VRAP!!!!!!!) - Sudden look at >the dashboard of life - Holy BeJezzuz! I turn fraggin' THIRTY in a few >months? What the $%&# happened? > >Were is my wife, kids and minivan? > Continue processing presently cued loop. The next version of the Vortex has minivan capability. Hang in there. B.P. And BTW, where have all the cowboys gone?........................ :-) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 22:44:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Marzzz@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: The Echoplex upgrade arrives! Message-ID: <970713224359_-526808763@emout05.mail.aol.com> In a message dated 7/13/97 8:29:53 PM, KF wrote: >>A curiosity: only the software has been changed or the hardware too? > >just software. Another question: How do you determine the software rev. on the Echoplex? ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 22:50:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Marzzz@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: MIDI looping Message-ID: <970713225000_424603478@emout19.mail.aol.com> In a message dated 7/13/97 8:59:08 PM, Kim wrote: >Other than that I would suggest using Max, which is a >graphical/object-oriented midi programming environment for the mac. It's a >great tool, created at IRCAM in France and sold by Opcode. I think the >sample applications that max even comes with even includes a midi delay and >a looper. I think it would be fairly easy to create a powerful midi looping >application with max. You could even design a nice big, custom gui. I'd be >surprised if someone hadn't already done this, actually. The thought also occurs to me that both Midi and Audio looping could be achieved (with a great deal of programming freedom) on a KYMA system, by Symbolic Sound. Last time I checked a basic system went for $4400 (dropping over the last few years), but considering all that it could do (from synthesis, digital audio, sample processing, effects, etc., etc., etc. in realtime) it might be worth considering.... Marshall ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 20:19:48 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: The Echoplex upgrade arrives! Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >In a message dated 7/13/97 8:29:53 PM, KF wrote: > >>>A curiosity: only the software has been changed or the hardware too? >> >>just software. > >Another question: > >How do you determine the software rev. on the Echoplex? It says on the display when it powers up. The new upgrade says it more dramatically than the last one.....and if the new start-up display doesn't get you all fired up to get it, I don't know what will! :-) kim ______________________________________________________________________ Kim Flint | Looper's Delight kflint@annihilist.com | http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html http://www.annihilist.com/ | Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 20:34:15 -0700 (PDT) From: The Man Himself To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Hey, I'm under Twenty-Fi....EEEEK!!!!!! Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sun, 13 Jul 1997, Robert Phelps wrote: > And BTW, where have all the cowboys gone?........................ :-) I guess those "doot - n'da - doot"s in the choruses do kinda qualify as a loop... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 00:10:13 -0400 From: Charles Cohen To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: MIDI looping Message-ID: <33C9A6A5.281E@voicenet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Megalomania 1.2.3 freeware at the usual places. Sort of a poor person's MAX -- **** What's Charles up to? **** http://www.voicenet.com/~ccohen ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 13 Jul 1997 21:15:28 -0700 From: "Stephen P. Goodman" To: Subject: Re: A couple of Responses Message-Id: <199707140415.VAA16662@usr07.primenet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >KelRey@aol.com wrote: > >> > >> In a message dated 7/13/97 2:34:41 PM, you wrote: > >> > >> < >> > >> < >> than me here!!!>> > >> Sorry...I'm 49 > >> dpc > >> >> > >> > >> Sorry dpc, > >> > >> I'm 52 > >> Kelly > > > >Sorry, Kelly, sometimes I feel 53 or even 54. > >Motley > > > 55, 55, do I hear 55? > > For that matter, we've heard 15, do we have 14? > > kim Well, if Kim adds to this foolishness, why shouldn't I? 40 here. What piffle! Stephen Goodman * Download The Loop Of The Week and more! EarthLight Studios * http://www.primenet.com/~sgoodman/Studios *--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 00:07:44 -0400 From: Todd Pafford To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Let The Power Fall - EMS Message-ID: <33C9A610.28F6237E@erols.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just so we all know, a friend of mine has a bootleg video of PF doing SSOSFAGTIACAGWAP live. Yes it's all vocals. There may be some synth stuff, but if so it's very discrete stuff in the background. I haven't seen the video in years, but from what I remember it's pretty minimal on electronics/effects/processing. Just goes to show that we don't always need fancy gizmos to get really far out. :) Of course, whether it's reproduced exactly the same live as it is on Ummagumma, I can't say. All I know is that it was really amazing to see. :) T.Pafford PainPete@aol.com wrote: > > Funny, I always thought SSOSFAGTIACAGWAP was largely sped-up spliced tape > loops of Roger Waters acting like small jungle mammals. Could we both be > right perhaps? > >>>>>> others' speculations cut for space <<<<<<<<<< ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 00:53:26 EDT From: jessekudler@juno.com (Jesse G Kudler) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: A couple of Responses Message-ID: <19970714.004954.8263.12.JesseKudler@juno.com> I apparently missed the original post, but let me say that I'm 18. -Jesse On Sat, 12 Jul 97 13:57:14 -0600 "mmason" writes: > > > Warren Sirota Wrote > > > is anyone on this list under 25? > > I'm 15. > > Jay or Boris > mmason@faulkcomp.com > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 04:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: BlkSwan03@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Let The Power Fall - EMS Message-ID: <970714040533_948762151@emout01.mail.aol.com> In a message dated 7/14/97 5:36:59 AM, you wrote: << Funny, I always thought SSOSFAGTIACAGWAP was largely sped-up spliced tape loops of Roger Waters acting like small jungle mammals. Could we both be right perhaps? >> Well, there's a lot of things going on in that piece, including sped up stuff and reversed stuff. I am talking mainly about the chant part (can't possibly figure out how to spell it out tho!) I'm speculating of course, but I did once get the very same type of sequence on the AKS. I wondered at the time if Roger just recorded over the parts with weird vocals to disguise the synth origins and make it even stranger. Jim ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 06:06:42 +0200 From: patrick@his.com (Patrick Smith) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Age Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Fellow Loopers, I'm 41 going on 16.......the toys just get more expensive...like my new Mackie 1604VLZ........very nice... Patrick *** *** ** Fingerpaint http://www.his.com/~patrick/FNGP.html *** ** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 10:58:23 -0300 From: matthias@bahianet.com.br (Matthias Grob) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Echoplex oddness check: Any volunteers? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Cleaning pots you can do yourself, you should be >able to get the stuff for that at an electronics parts shop. You might as >well have it on hand, because anyone using electronic music gear will need >it eventually. With contact spray? Air? ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 10:58:28 -0300 From: matthias@bahianet.com.br (Matthias Grob) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: old is better than new? Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Pete: >I have never been able to re-create that sound since I got >better gear and practiced a lot. Now, for some reason, the new stuff sounds >like shit in some ways when compared to the old stuff, the old just seems to >have unique qualities about it that seem to have been lost in the new. Is that a quality of evolution? With each new thing, an old one gets lost? But, would that be a reason to stick to the old, which is elaborated, rather than elaborate the new? >Dexterity limitations and funky gear give you so much built-in restraint in a >way (something that most guitarists don't have naturally) and with chops and >a big-ass amp comes the-guitarist-won't-shut-up syndrome, or something. (At >least I have that problem, which I just decided to call premature >Riff-jaculation). We may feel better, if we have a exterior limitation, than if the limitation is our own capacity. For example: I sometimes have the impression that someone is actually happy not to have money, so he cannot buy a tool, and therfore not work and so he sits there, hapy with what he has. Is that modesty? and Warren: >Perhaps loop music can work as an analogue to dance music for older >people (is anyone on this list under 25?) Whereas rock (functionally >speaking) is pre-mating music for social rituals among young single >people, maybe loop music can occur in situations which encourage social >interaction (which is frequently rather limited) among mature, working >adults who may have families - maybe there's a new kind of social ritual >that could be created around this. This sound almost like: 'Dance for the young, meditation for the old' and 'Loops are for meditation' ... might be tendences, but I understand Kims cry for the new loop music: >resisting oppression by the ambient tyranny It seams that the loop music so far is somehow dominated by the old that participated on the its development on tapes (the name Echoplex unfortunately suggests this), while the new (or young) will develop much more with the extended technology, and therefore are more interesting (to me as musician and especially as developper) than the authentic reproduction or slight improvement of the old which of course also is of value. resisting the idea that meditation calls for old methods or old people Matthias ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 10:58:35 -0300 From: matthias@bahianet.com.br (Matthias Grob) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: A couple of responses Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Warren said: >Well, I love improvisation, and loop-based improv is especially >hypnotizing. I agree with the quote that it can (at least sometimes) >give us a window into the performer's soul. However, that is only of >concern to certain niche audiences. Most prefer an "entertainment >experience", which means tighter structure, clean transitions and >attention to pacing. Sometimes I want to cater to this and sometimes >not. My way is to improvise and edit afterwards to get a "tight structure" Matthias ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 10:39:11 -0400 From: "Ott, John" To: "'loopers delight'" Subject: MIDI looping on a Mac Message-ID: ----kIm flint writes--- It does seem like a pretty obvious use of midi to me. And you seem to be right, there aren't really any good tools that I know of for real-time midi looping. Plenty for non-real-time, of course. It would be interesting to hear from people who have cobbled together midi looping setups. kim ---end quote--- I have a Korg X-5 that came with Mark of the Unicorn's Freesytle MIDI sequencing software. I use that on PCI mac. You create a loop of X measures up in Freesytle then play and record the MIDI loop at same time. I've used this setup mainly for MIDI Percussion. I'm still learning Freesytle and havie not figured out how to switch between loops on the Fly. I seem to end up using the JamMan for guitar and synth sounds. My home studio is under construction so when I'm finished (In 2005 at the rate I'm going) I'll have to explore MIDI looping for sound. I'm also looking at getting MIDI/synth for guitar also. I can't seem to decide between a Roland GR-1 and the GR-30. Some mail order house have good prices on the GR-1 but no music store in the area seem to have one I can demo. Most have a VG-8 and GR-30 setup for demo. Can anyone Highlight the key differences between the GR-1 and GR-30 for me? I think the VG-8 is a bit pricey for me. later John ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 16:47:58 +0200 (MET DST) From: Olivier Malhomme To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V97 #109 Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > Any other indulgent Fripp "Tribute" recordings out there? Anyone ever tried > to fool their friends with one, and gotten away with it? (I have, though I'm > not entirely sure how)! Well I did with with a one some of you know called "carcinoma in situ" I eventually chaged the whole thing after wards adding drums, fretless guitar guitar solo and Stick with a quotation from 'Pandora" (wh James mason and Ava Gardner). So the whole thing wasn't alike anymore. I must say that I must hank in his one Robbie Aceto who made possible by teaching me (through this list, one day) the idea of "wild sync". OM ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 11:05:49 -0400 From: "Ott, John" To: "'Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com'" Subject: RE: Echoplex oddness check: Any volunteers? Message-ID: Radio Shack sells "Color TV tuner Cleaner" this works well for cleaning any electrical contact. >---------- >From: matthias@bahianet.com.br >Reply To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >Sent: Monday, July 14, 1997 9:58 AM >To: John_Ott@ATK.COM >Subject: Re: Echoplex oddness check: Any volunteers? > > >>Cleaning pots you can do yourself, you should be >>able to get the stuff for that at an electronics parts shop. You might as >>well have it on hand, because anyone using electronic music gear will need >>it eventually. > >With contact spray? Air? > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 09:51:14 +0400 From: miguel.barella@poyry.com.br (MAT) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com, Dpcoffin@aol.com Subject: Re[2]: A couple of Responses Message-ID: <00002626.@poyry.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part This makes me think 40 is not so bad. Miguel ___________________________ Separador de Resposta ______________________________ Assunto: Re: A couple of Responses Autor: Dpcoffin@aol.com na INTERNET Data: 13/07/1900 14:48 In a message dated 7/13/97 8:14:15 AM, Randy wrote: <> Sorry...I'm 49 dpc ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 17:48:03 +0200 (MET DST) From: Olivier Malhomme To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Midi looping Message-ID: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In fact I use midi loops. The main reason is money. I still don't own one these beauties wa talk about so often. So, the only way to have long loops for me was 1) use my multitrack recorder to repaet muiscal (or not) phrases during as long as I want and do that many times then mix it, and doeas look almost like aloop (in fact not beacause you hear many subtle differences since one does not paly exactly the same thing twice, but well...) 2) I use my old Cubase 2.0 running on a not less old Atari 1040st, mich makes a midi delay you can programm as you want with the little detail that you can not have more than a full note as a delay length, but with a tempo of 30 running, it mean almost 8 second of delay which still is for me like heaven. The good thing is I can record the loop on midi, I can change the sounds whnever I want. I can edit it like i add a audio loop on a good direct to disk machine for 150 bucks. Well that is not true, you have to add the price of the synth guitar I use with. OM ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 10:37:19 -0700 From: "Matt McCabe" To: Subject: Re: Amplifiers for looping Message-Id: <199707141745.KAA12470@gw1.bi-tech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > From: SoundFNR@aol.com > Part One > What makes a good amplification setup for loops in a > live context ? (any recomendations?) > Guitar amp for sound character. > Or a PA type system to accurately produce > a multi-layered effect. > Stereo? I'm using two EV-12L speakers in my stereo guitar rig and I love it. I'd highly recommend the speakers to anyone....very musical and "guitar" sounding. Unless you own a good speaker emulation or prefer that "direct" tone -- go with guitar cabinets. Having said that, on occasion I do record my loops direct to tape...it all depends on the end product desired. > Part Two > How does the sound 'quality' effect what > the player does with the loop? "Sound quality" is so subjective. Bottom line: you've got to be able to tolerate your tone/sound. If you hate the way your rig sounds, you aren't going to want to play. Matt ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 16:07:33 -0400 From: Michael Peters To: "'INTERNET:Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com'" Subject: Age (of Aquarius) Message-ID: <199707141607_MC2-1AD9-F690@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline ok, maybe this will help to end the 'Age' thread: The average age of us is 33.4 (that is, the average age of the 48 loopers who have their bio on our website, and specified their age). btw, I'm 43. ___________ Michael Peters http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/mpeters HOP - Fractals in Motion ..."the only screen saver you'll ever want" http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/mpeters/hop.htm Support the Warr Guitar Defense Fund http://home.earthlink.net/~greendog/warrfund.html ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 12:54:00 -0400 From: "Hogan, Greg" To: Loopers-Delight Subject: RE: Vortex pedal Message-Id: <9707142014.AA29193@beryllium.lexicon.com> Jesse asked: "A music store today told me that they were getting a continuous control pedal from Lexicon directly for $30. Does this is exist or was the music store guy confused?" I think the store guy is confused. We offer no continuous control pedal for $30.00. The Dual footswitch does list for $30.00. Please let me know if you have any questions or if there is anything that I can do for you. Best regards, Greg Hogan Lexicon Customer Service Phone 617-280-0372 FAX 617-280-0499 email: ghogan@lexicon.com P.S. Cogradulations Kim et al on your new release and thank you for this forum! ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 14 Jul 1997 14:34:24 -0700 From: Kim Flint To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Age (of Aquarius) Message-Id: <2.2.32.19970714213424.00accebc@pop.chromatic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 04:07 PM 7/14/97 -0400, Michael Peters wrote: >ok, maybe this will help to end the 'Age' thread: > >The average age of us is 33.4 (that is, the average age of the 48 loopers >who have their bio on our website, and specified their age). min? max? median? standard deviation? Let's do some curve fitting! Why stop now? Looping demographics! Wow, this is great! :-) kim > > >btw, I'm 43. >___________ >Michael Peters > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/mpeters >HOP - Fractals in Motion ..."the only screen saver you'll ever want" > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/mpeters/hop.htm >Support the Warr Guitar Defense Fund > http://home.earthlink.net/~greendog/warrfund.html > > > > ________________________________________________________ Kim Flint 408-752-9284 Mpact System Engineering kflint@chromatic.com Chromatic Research http://www.chromatic.com --------------------------------