Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: A = 440 Hz OR 432 Hz?



Well, I'm not sure this is what Rainer means, but I can tell that in
saxophone playing it makes sense to tune a few cents high and actually
"play low". The point is that you can have much looser lips and get a
better (to my taste) sound that way. You also keep the option to
perform vibrato with a pitch amplitude that goes both over and under
the nominal pitch (a habit I picked up from playing guitar with the
STratocaster vibrato bar set up as "floating"). But in sax playing
this "looser lips" approach goes even a bit further as it adds more of
timbre tremolo behind the vibrato's pitch oscillations.

Greetings from Sweden

Per Boysen
www.perboysen.com
http://www.youtube.com/perboysen


On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rainer Straschill
<moinsound@googlemail.com> wrote:
> andy butler schrieb:
>>
>> Instrument makers typically tell you that you should tune above the
>> resonances for a nicer sound - go figure *.
>>
>> ....which instrument?
>>
>> andy
>
> Ok, I stand corrected insofar as the word "typically" in my sentence 
> isn't
> the correct choice. I know it from two violin makers and one saxophone 
> maker
> I know.
>
>          Rainer
>
> ps: I also remember we did this in high frequency circuit design ("high"
> meaning 20-300GHz)
>
> --
> http://moinlabs.de
> Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/moinlabs
>