] [Thread Prev
Re: 3 million hits with livelooping
Fair enough, Todd. Just trying to provide a different perspective is
all. It is not as bad as it seems ;)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:18 PM, todd reynolds <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> IF there is dung being flung... (and truly I've found value in quite a
> number of comments, dung OR mung)...
> Perhaps it's because Matthias, one of the sweetest among us, made the
> semantic choice to say, "guys, what do you think of this?" Perhaps just
> bit too open of a question. Everybody seemed to pile on quickly with the
> voice of his/her own criticism.
> To Matthias, I've been waiting to really hear what you yourself thought
> about this, because I always value hearing your voice in the mix.
> Perhaps I
> missed it in the thread already though.
> Cheers to all of you, each one of whom I appreciate.
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Ricky Graham
>> Well done, Chaz. It would not do any of you any harm to take the
>> positives away from this video, beyond your own aesthetic. It
>> currently provides a platform, albeit temporary, to present the
>> fundamental idea behind looping audio in real-time. Who cares if he
>> wears glasses in-doors. The fact is, the video presents a musical
>> concept that supposedly this list is invested in, lots of people are
>> watching it and it is seemingly bringing joy into peoples lives. I
>> suppose it all comes down to what you consider meaningful to you, the
>> individual. If you find it meaningful to adopt a cynical point of view
>> and bash other peoples creativity, whether it is pop or otherwise,
>> then fine. I think Matthias was looking for some constructive feedback
>> but instead this thread has descended into dung.