] [Thread Prev
Re: Live Looping versus using Pre-Recorded Loops
Rick and everyone,
Man, I am so glad I met many of you in Santa Cruz the other week. I
really feel like I've found creative kindred.
About the live looping vs pre-recorded loops. . .
For me, I love the challenge of creating an arrangement that I can
perform live by recording all the loops on stage with nothing pre-
recorded. When I perform, however, most people ASSUME that I am using
pre-recorded loops. Only the good musicians in the crowd realize what
is happening, and they are appreciative of what I am doing.If I was
using pre-recorded loops, I think the "energy" would be a lot
different, like Rick was saying about the shows he has seen. And it
would be less interesting for me.
When I'm going to loop on stage, why would I want to create loops
beforehand? I take no recorded loops on the stage with me, I do my
thing, and then I delete ALL the loops at the end. Sometimes I
capture the performance as a whole, but hardly ever. Someone told me
its kind of like a live sand-painting performance. I think thats
about right. With sand-painting, you can video tape it but you can't
preserve the sand itself. With live looping, you can record the audio
and video, but you can't capture the "grit" and emotional texture of
the live feeling.
And my performance is a little different every time, no matter how
much I might rehearse my arrangements. That's that adventure of it.
Michael Carlson (TripleOhNine)
On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:34 PM, Rick Walker wrote:
Much is said about audiences not knowing the difference between
hitting play on a computer that has complete tracks stored, someone
pre-recorded loops or someone who is looping everything in front of
I go to see a very wide variety of musical performances that use
technical augmentation, from ones that are completely
canned (Fisher Spooner) to ones partially canned (a tremendous
amount of the
big electronic shows) to artists who do all of their looping live in
front of the audience.
My experience is that people really do get, viscerally, when someone
is playing something in real time
that they loop and then play other things against (including other
A couple of artists in recent years, who shall remain nameless,
have only played in real time over
loops or samples that were pre-recorded. The energy of their sets
was really markedly different
from the ones that didn't take this approach. Of course, our loop
festival audiences are not typical
but many people complained about these performances after the
fact. They bothered me, to be honest.
The fact of the matter is it's infinitely easier to do all of your
looping ahead of your performance
and then just fly them in as is musically suitable.
To me, it's much more dangerous to have to pull all of one's tech
off in front of an audience; to
play live in real time in front of an audience even if you are
looping yourself for augmentation's sake.
That's why , despite the fact that no one could tell from merely a
recording of a performance whether someone
looped live or just flew in pre-recorded loops or samples, I think
there is a huge difference between the two
and this is why I am proud to be a live looping artist.
This is why I specifically make the distinction that the Y2K
Festivals are Live Looping Festivals
and why I send out a performance agreement before booking people a
spot on the festival.
Out of 11 years of performance only two artists have disregarded the
rules about creating live looping
content in front of the audience. We'll have to have a heart to
heart talk if those artists ever want to
play the festival again.