Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: What's your looper control strategy?



NanoKontrol, I'd say; but you still have your handy mixer that can do 
more, I think.
Cheap, light and easy to program.

 I own an iPhone since 2 years now and sometime I use it for music in live 
situation but I'm not attracted by using it as a controller. 
I do think its display is too small, if you need a lot of midi controls. 
Sure, iPad is better in that domain.
Me too don't like to concentrate my sight on screens while I play: better 
having an easy access to your controller so you don't have to break your 
musical fluxus.

-f
www.eterogeneo.com


Il giorno 02/giu/2011, alle ore 22:15, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> ha 
scritto:

> What's your take on the ultimate question of finding a balance between
> playing and controlling looper actions?
> 
> Personally my rig is set up with four stereo loopers in parallel.
> Sometimes I create loops in all four to fade them in and out
> seamlessly but other times I stick with only one channel and overdub
> musical parts as new layers into the same loop, then typically
> creating a bunch of (never more than five) alternative linear loops to
> jump between as "A-B-C" song parts.
> 
> It was a year now since I skipped bringing a little MIDI hand mixer
> and my recent live looping is all controlled by just one MIDI foot
> pedalboard with ten switches and two expression pedal. However, I'm
> now thinking of plugging in my old mini MIDI hand mixer again as well
> as getting a third expression pedal in. I've been feeling
> uncomfortable with the heavy "tap dancing" on the control pedals
> needed for such a foot dependent control situation. I want to get back
> to having most looper commands instantly available for both feet and
> hands. My foot controller, the Gordius Little Giant 2, offers ten
> switches in one bank and if you need to give a command that is
> included in another bank you will have to first kick the bank change
> switch, then kick the apart command, then kick the bank change switch
> again in order to get back into the the bank where you are mostly
> busy. Better than to stay in the fist bank and simply move one hand
> off the instrument for two seconds to press a MIDI button on the side
> table for the apart command. Or what?
> 
> The three expression pedals are for
> 1) Looper Feedback,
> 2) Live Audio Input Swell (manual fade-in/out, typically used to get a
> soft violin-like note attack) combined with Freeze-reverb (in a
> crossfade value manner).
> 3) Activating tremolo stuttering of the (pre looper) Freeze-reverb and
> sweep through rhythmic values between 1/4 note and 1/68 note.
> 
> The looper function I have been dissing for the last year is Feedback,
> but I want to get back to it now with this third expression pedal.
> It's nice to have the option do pieces that focus on only one loop,
> using the feedback function as a sculpturing tool.
> 
> With the returning little hand mixer I'm getting back to controlling
> the Mobius looper's Secondary Feedback globally from a robust hand
> mixer fader. I use Secondary Feedback for Substitute, as a way to
> control how much of the old audio layers will be kept vs thrown out
> under a new slice I cut into the loop. I tried to replace this hand
> control fader by a foot switch set up as
> 
> 1 click  = Secondary Feedback 0
> 2 clicks = Secondary Feedback 64 (my default)
> 3 clicks = Secondary Feedback 110
> 4 clicks = Secondary Feedback 127 (equaling "Overdub")
> 
> But it just got to too much tap dancing ;-))   And I noticed I often
> need to dial in more precise Secondary Feedback values than those
> four. And four rapid clicks on a foot switch is kind of the upper
> limit for how many functions you can stack on the same switch anyway.
> 
> Greetings from Sweden
> 
> Per Boysen
> www.boysen.se
> www.perboysen.com
> www.looproom.com internet music hub
>