Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
That is the breakout box that I bought last year. It works great to split up the strings and process them individualy but for some reason doesn't seem to be compatable with the roland us-20. I get the signal through the us-20 but it continues no mater what pedal I press. Paul Haslem Ontario, Canada www.dulcify.ca Quoting Kevin Cheli-Colando <billowhead@gmail.com>: > Another option I've discovered (someone here pointed me to this a > while ago I think) > > http://billbax.110mb.com/ > > Anyone have an experience with these (horrible website btw). > > Kevin > > > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:14 AM, paul <phaslem@wightman.ca> wrote: >> I have a US-20 and presently drive an Axon AX-50 and a WP-20. It works >> great, lets you run one or the other or both. I paid $250.00 for it but >in >> the long run it's been worth it because it works and it lets me do what >I >> wanted to do. The other device from Germany that I think you're >referring to >> is a SW41 by Klaus Schock ( >> http://www.klausschock.com/Products/products.html ) It's designed to >use up >> to 4 different guitars going out to one 13 pin device. He doesn't make >them >> on a regular basis, I ordered one last year about this time and only >just >> now recieved it, but haven't had time to play with it yet. Oh, and the >price >> of that is 215.00 eur. >> >> Recently I've been experimenting with a breakout box and running each >string >> into bidule and processing them individually. Got some interesting >results, >> but boy was that a drain on the cpu! Of course if you have enough stomp >> boxes you could do the same thing with hardware and then bring each >signal >> into a mixer. I tried to use the US-20 with the breakout box but for >some >> reason the switching doesn't work and you always have the signal from >the >> BOB on but I could turn the synth side on and off. >> >> Paul Haslem >> Ontario, Canada >> www.dulcify.ca >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 07:59 AM 1/20/2011, you wrote: >>> >>> On 1/20/11 4:01 PM, "Per Boysen" <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > Can't you simply put ą MIDI cable fr.o.m. The VG into the utger >device? >>> >>> Won't work, in most cases. The VG, of course, requires an actual audio >>> signal to process via its COSM algorithm, so it's obvious why that's a >>> non-starter through MIDI. However, most (all?) other guitar synths >will >>> also require a guitar-type controller to trigger the synth engine; they >>> cannot be played via normal MIDI note input. So the architecture >needs to >>> be a "split and run in parallel" setup, rather than a "chain one device >>> after another" effect run. >>> >>> Now if the question were concerning the VG in tandem with a generic >MIDI >>> synth module, your solution would work just fine. I've done the same >with >>> my VG-99 in conjunction with a JV-1080. Unfortunately in this case, >both >>> devices need to be driven from a GK-style pickup controller. >>> >>> Unless I overlooked something in the original problem description. >>> Kevin...? >>> >>> (P.S. There's another footswitch besides the GKP-4 or US-20 that will >>> allow >>> you to take two GK inputs and route them to three different devices. > It's >>> a >>> custom job from a different company out of, I think, Germany. It's >>> expensive, but not so much more than having to pay $200 for a US-20. > At >>> least you feel like you're getting something besides ripped off for >that >>> one.) >>> >>> --m. >> >> > > > > -- > Till now you seriously considered yourself to be the body and to have a > form. That is the primal ignorance which is the root cause of all >trouble. > > - Ramana Maharshi (1879-1950) > > Sound and Vision: http://www.minds-eye.org > Video http://www.vimeo.com/user877640/videos > >