] [Thread Prev
RE: OT: was $280 Midi Guitar (andy's trick) + is Stringport betterthen AX50
I have StringPort . . . I bought it only about 4 weeks ago . . . I'm
still groping with it's complexity in fact . . . so take my comments
with a grain of salt.
I think comparing it to the AX50 is like comparing apples and oranges .
. . the concept sort of seems the same . . . but StringPort seems rather
a lot more complex.
This may be unfair, but it's a bit like comparing MS Word to Photoshop .
. . similar, but not really.
I have only had a little experience with StringPort so far (not all of
it good, BTW) but it presents possibilities that are even above and
beyond the multiple GR and VG units I also own combined.
I am still trying to get a handle on it.
tEd ® kiLLiAn
Man is the only animal that can remain on friendly terms with the
victims he intends to eat until he eats them. – Samuel Butler (1835 -
Ted Killian's "Flux Aeterna" is also available at Apple iTunes
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Christopher Darrow wrote:
> 2) Is Stringport really better then the AX50? Does it track better
> even with regular midi plugins rather then their software? Is it more
> processor intensive then the AX50, such that a laptop would start
> exhibiting bad behavior with a bunch of plugins and effects open in
> Live, etc.? Could really use a user report if anybody has experience
> with these. Or if not both, then your review of the Stringport.
> Much thanks!