] [Thread Prev
Re: Best and worst features
> Quoting William Walker <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> Hello, I would love to hear feedback from anyone who owns one of the
>> following Loopers.
>> Would you be into providing your perspectives on the 3 Best and Worst
>> aspects of any of these products.
> Hi, I have wanted to respond to this and I haven't yet read any other
> comments. I don't want to bias my comments by reading other people's
> I own the LP1 and the RC50. Here are my observations:
> RC50 Best / Worst features:
> RC50 Summary:
> The RC50 is a good all-around, stand-alone looper and master clock
> source. It has everything you need for looping (pedals, input mixer).
> It has impeccable sound qualtiy. Not particularly successful when
> slaved to MIDI Clock. The ability to control the RC50's functions via
> MIDI commands is extremely limited.
> No feedback control.
Are your above comments based on early or latest firmware?
My understanding from other threads in here is that Roland/Boss a kinda
slow to implement features, but also that they did do a few things.
One more thing: Do you happen to know how the RC-50 is layed out
internally, meaning if the has one large circuit board, or a separate
board for the processing, with the buttons arranged on their own?
If possible, I'd be very happy for a pic or a link to an inside pic.
Reason: I'd be interested in mounting the processing part in a smaller
box, and operate it through MIDI, if possible.