And the amount of sulfur at ground zero, reported to be the biggest mystery. Again, sulfur assists cordite in beam cutting during planned implosions, etc...
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Chris Sewell <email@example.com>
The building 7 issue seems to be the single biggest craw in the official story.
On Aug 3, 2008, at 9:39 PM, David Coffin wrote:
I watched a DVD produced by these folks, I believe:
It was at a much more outraged friend's house. I came in a skeptic (but not someone who is generally impressed by previous Official Inquiries by Those in Power) and left very troubled. I'm feeling that the most compelling reason to dismiss the doubters is that it's just too bloody awful to contemplate the implications...
On Aug 3, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Mark Smart wrote:
They're talking seriously and from an engineer's POV about such
apparent facts as that not a single steel-frame skyscraper in history
has ever collapsed due to fire, even though many have burned much
hotter than the Twin Towers did, or could have if it was only a jet-
I was not aware of this. Where can I find information about these
other skyscraper fires with no collapse? Were the fires as large as
the ones at the WTC?
"The Universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent to the concerns of such creatures as we." - Carl Sagan, from "Cosmos"