] [Thread Prev
Re: Very OT: Zeitgeist, The Movie... WAS... Semi-OT: Int'l Travellers' Laptops Confiscated...
Building 7 is the thing that gets me. It fell straight down after a
small fire burned for 5 hours in one corner. Impossible. Plus, a
bunch of really experienced pilots tried to hit the wtc in a flight
simulator under the same conditions and couldn't do it. There's a ton
of curiosities that don't make sense.
Now I don't think the bush guys could possibly be responsible. One
reason, it worked. But I do think it's possible that they knew about
it and let it happen in an effort to facilitate their ambitions.
I know, I'm crazy. I realize that if any of this is true, we are WAY
more fucked then we thought possible.
On Aug 3, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Mark Smart wrote:
> Well, I haven't read much about 9/11 conspiracy theories so far, so I
> don't have immediate replies for all these. My reaction to the way
> this video is put together and to conspiracy theories in general is
> EXTREME SKEPTICISM. The WTC controlled demolition hypothesis to me
> seems utterly outrageous. A huge plane filled with jet fuel crashes
> into a building creating a fire that burns above 2000 degrees F
> (easily hot enough to soften steel...I used to work in a steel mill,
> and heating it to this temp is plenty to soften it up for easy
> milling) and the building is NOT supposed to collapse? That's hard for
> me to buy. Plus trying to hide massive amounts of explosives in a
> building without anyone noticing. The simpler explanation tends to be
> the correct one (Occam's Razor).
> But I will watch some more and do some more reading.
> Mark Smart