Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: definition looper

The idea that there are certain qualifications to be labeled a Pope bugs me.  First, is it really necessary to label people?..

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 2:21 PM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
and the Pope?

Travis Hartnett wrote:
[1] No, you have to use looping in your music to be considered a looping musician, not vice versa.
[2] No.
[3] As long as he satisfies [1], he is a looping musician.  The presence of an audience qualifies you as a performing musician.  Playing music qualifies you as a musician.


TH

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Bob Amstadt <bobld@amstadt.com <mailto:bobld@amstadt.com>> wrote:

   [1] Do you have to be a "looper" to use looping in your music?  [2]
   Do you have to perform in front of other people to be a looper?    [3]Why can't the guy who plays music in his bedroom without ever
   getting in front of people be a looper?
Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!
In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!