Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why SHOULDN'T musicians be paid?



Nice rejoinder. I dig the point. I've certainly been in musical 
situations where the !worth! was higher than at other times, but perhaps 
it's pointless/impossible to compare.

Daryl Shawn
www.swanwelder.com
www.chinapaintingmusic.com

> !worth! is a indicator of Quality, and is unquantifiable. 
> While the desire to do so is understandable, the quest to determine 
> "universal units" for !worth! is what produced $worth$.
>
> As some comedian said: "So, the Y2K problem.  Aren't terms like "Y2K" 
> what got us into this mess in the first place?"
>
> TH
>
> On 4/16/08, *Daryl Shawn* <highhorse@mhorse.com 
> <mailto:highhorse@mhorse.com>> wrote:
>
>     This is really well put, Travis...it corresponds closely to my
>     thoughts on this whole shebang. Nice to differentiate !worth! and
>     $worth$.
>
>     We should come up with universal units for !worth!.
>
>
>


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!
Get the Looper's Delight Subscriber CD Vol 1!
Get the Looper's Delight Subscriber CD Vol 1!