Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Looping venue help



----- Original Message ----- 

> Hi Krispen (and everyone else),
>
>> plays for a living. You could take it even further and say
>> that when you play for fee, but don't really need the money,
>> you are doing that same. It all depends on your political and
>
> This is a very dangerous line of argument. It's called communism and
> socialism, and leads to dictatorship, torture, mass murder, economic
> breakdown and in the final outcome, to a world where there isn't a place 
> for
> your crazy stuff (nor for your well-paying day job).

What's wrong with those things? Just kidding. :)  Yes, I wasn't advocating 
the viewpoint, just calling it out as a possible line of thought.  I hope 
freedom of thought and expression is acceptable on the list. There are 
many 
flavors of fascism...intellectual being one of them. A line of argument 
and 
idea is one thing (sacred, imo) and should be allowed to stand. Action is 
quite another animal.

>> festival.  In this case, paying for free/fee doesn't appear
>> to be a problem, because this is not the type of event or
>> music that is inherently designed to be profit generating,
>
> The "kind of event" approach is very important to me as a 
>non-professional
> who is not dependent on earning money from making music. I myself don't 
> have
> the slightest problem to play without getting paid if nobody else gets 
> paid
> for it directly or indirectly. While I didn't do (or asked you to 
>explain 
> to
> me) the math for things like BEMF or Y2Kloopfestival, it's rather 
>obvious 
> to
> me that if these events generate some actual earnings, it would be in the
> range of, let's say, 20 to 30 bucks per musician. I believe this money is
> better invested in a) amenities from which the musicians at the festival
> benefit, b) compensation for the festival manager (we're still talking 
> about
> that kind of money where someone working his ass off for months on end 
>may
> get, if he's lucky, a few hundred dollars).

Good points. Though I still refuse to be compensated financially for my 
efforts. My compensation and reward is the event iteself and hanging out 
with all of you.

> Summarizing: I will not give away my art if somebody else gets money from
> it. I am happy to give away my art if all other parties get from the 
>deal 
> is
> my art.
>
> Rainer

It's not a bad principle to follow, Rainer. I tend to agree.

Kris


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!