Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT-SUPER LATE POST to MULTI-effects: Line6 POD X3 Live



Thanks, I enjoyed the review.

I'm a line6 fan, and I've switched from the TonePort UX2 to the
GearBox Gold Plug-in. While I'm happy with the Gearbox tones, I'm even
more happy with having my tone in the plug-in, making it easy to swap
one amp model for another.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill
<rs@moinlabs.de> wrote:
> Ok, this is it: a little more in-depth review of Line6's biggest 
>floorboard babe, the Line6 POD X3 Live.
>
>
>  CONCEPT:
>  Line6 has been known for their amp modeling know-how for a long time. 
>In fact, I believe they somehow invented it (at least to do it properly). 
>Following up on the success of their first POD, they supplied a big line 
>of products, including effects modellers (the DL4 is well known in these 
>parts), guitar amps with modelling functions and finally even 
>instruments. However, the center of their product catalogue remains the 
>POD - and it's now in generation three. Europeam retail prices for the 
>POD X3 Live are in the just below €500 region.
>
>
>  PACKAGE:
>  The "live" variant of this thing (in the first generation, there had 
>only been the stupid kidney-shaped thing and the rackmount "Pro" version) 
>is a sturdy, black device. Twelve footswitches, a heavy-duty style 
>expression pedal and a total of eight big metal knobs are the eyecatchers 
>here (together with two strange handlebars which may serve some 
>protective or rather some aesthetic function?)
>  From the more electronic interface side, this is rounded off by a 
>something like 5x3cm orange-backlit LCD, five softknobs, a four-way 
>navigator and four buttons.
>  While the footswitches, the pedal and also the metal knobs look really 
>made for eternity, the small soft knobs do much less so - definitely 
>something that may fail under heavy road use.
>  It immediately catches the eye that the metal knobs have position 
>indicators of the mechanical kind. No rotary encoders here, and what 
>disturbs me most is that the values controlled by these "jump" if you 
>turn those knobs - meaning that if you're in the midst of a quite passage 
>with a clean sound and want to edge up drive just a bit and the knob 
>happens to be at full blast, then you're instantly in death metal hell.
>
>  Connection-wise, you get the full ballbark: two inputs for guitars (or 
>basses, 1/4''), two independent pairs of outputs (1/4'' and XLR), phones, 
>aux input (1/8'' stereo), Variax guitar connection, microphone in (XLR, 
>but why no phantom power???) effects loop (mono send/stereo return), 
>SPDIF out, MIDI in and out/thru, USB and connection for the power supply 
>(which is a non-SPS one).
>  The phones output hasn't got a separate volume knob - but you can at 
>least disconnect the XLR outs from the volume knob.
>
>  All in all nice looking - except for the following:
>         * crappy looking soft knobs
>         * big knobs not rotary encoder, no snap function
>         * effects loop only with mono send
>
>
>  FUNCTIONALITY:
>  Two things jump out here, both in comparison to other products and to 
>earlier versions of the POD.
>  First, the X3 got two completely independent processing paths in 
>stereo. You can even use separate inputs and outputs for these, or do the 
>in/out configuration any way you like. Also editing and control is 
>completely independent. The only limitation here is that the effects loop 
>can only be applied to two of these processing paths (which are called 
>"Tones" here).
>  Second, the X3 offers a full complement of models (amps, cabs and 
>effects) both for guitar and bass. This is I believe a first (and 
>currently only) in class - even with Roland/Boss' latest products, you 
>still have to get two devices to have both. This is also what made me 
>choose this product over competitors.
>
>  These two items might make this the perfect companion for Warr guitar 
>players (or for players of any instrument with two outputs and huge tonal 
>range from bass to guitar register).
>
>  Each tone is built up of a sequence of processing blocks. Basically, it 
>goes like 
>Input->Gate->Wah->Stomp->(Loop->Mod->Delay->Verb->)Amp+Cab->Comp->EQ->(Loop->Mod->Delay->Verb->)Output.
> The blocks in parantheses can be placed either pre or post amp, but not 
>both at the same time in the same tone.
>  This already shows another big weakness of the X3: there is only 
>minimum flexibility in signal routing. You may not have the delay in 
>front of the mod block (unless you put the delay before and the mod after 
>the amp), and you also can't have the compressor after the EQ - or, more 
>importantly, the EQ before the stomp box for some tone shaping before the 
>spectrum hits a distortion pedal.
>
>  The sheer number of independent processing blocks really screams 
>powerful here - but what it has to offer in power, it lacks in 
>flexibility. It's some like a 1000bhp car without steering to that 
>respect.
>
>
>  MODELS:
>  I personally always liked the Line6 amp models much better than those 
>of any other modeling thing builder, period. And that hasn't changed. New 
>is that there are really tons of those. A total of 42 amp (divided into 
>guitar, bass, and preamp sections), which can be freely combined with 24 
>cabinet models (in guitar and bass section). A pity that you have a 
>choice of four microphones each for guitar and bass cabs, but can't mix 
>those (e.g. mike a guitar cabinet with an EV RE20 mike).
>  Like I said before, those amp models are - great. They work equally 
>well for clean and super-meltdown sounds and, more importantly, anything 
>in between. Playing with those will have you experiment for hours, only 
>that in comparison to earlier incarnations of the POD the number of 
>models has vastly increased, AND now you can have two sounds at the same 
>time (meaning your experimentation time to the power of two).
>
>  The effects models are an assortment of their models mainly from the 
>DL4, MM4 and DM4 modelers, plus some reverbs from the Vetta amps, Wahs 
>from the Vetta, plus some new creations. What is really strange, however, 
>is that some extremely important effects have been left out for no 
>obvious reason - in the case of the delay effects, the dynamic delay 
>model (ducking delay).
>  There's only one compressor (except for those available in the "stomp" 
>section), but I don't care. I know that LA-2A model from the Bass POD 
>which I used to own and it's wonderful.
>
>  With that focus (and also centre of expertise) on guitarist/stompbox 
>stuff come some big limitations. First, I still have to find a convincing 
>reverb effect in this unit, which sounds good and has more controls than 
>"predelay", "decay", "tone" and "mix". Second, there is not a single 
>pitch shifter effect in the whole unit. There's not even a whammy bar. My 
>cheap Zoom G2 has both.
>
>  Another thing I noticed is that the documentation doesn't go on as 
>deeply about the different models as it used to. Again referring to the 
>Bass POD, there was about half a page for each bass amp and cabinet 
>model. Now, there's like four lines of fine print per amp model, and only 
>a table of available cabinet models without any description.
>
>
>  COMPUTER AND MIDI INTEGRATION:
>  MIDI support is nearly nonexistent. You can react to program changes 
>and can also send them. They don't even mention that in detail in the 
>documentation. There's no possibility to control parameters via MIDI or 
>to send or receive MIDI clock.
>
>  For the computer connection, we get a USB2.0 interface which is used to 
>interface with the editor software "Monkey" and also act as a direct 
>eight-channel audio input. Pity only that there are no drivers for 64-bit 
>Windows systems, no are there any concrete plans for that. A big letdown.
>
>
>  PLAYING IT:
>  It's got sooo many flaws - and yet, it's great fun to play it, and even 
>to edit sounds on it. It's a huuge amount of fun to just create tones, to 
>discover the beauty in the sound of your guitar, to combine guitar and 
>bass amps for some outstanding sound...
>
>
>  SUMMARY:
>  There are so many flaws in this unit I don't even remember all of them. 
>Whimpy soft knobs, stupid concept for the big knobs, no phantom power on 
>the mic in, no separate volume knob for the phones, completely inadequate 
>routing structure, important effect models missing, lame reverbs, no x64 
>drivers, no stereo send for effects loop, crappy power supply...yet 
>judging it for what is in the centre of it, it deserves nothing but 
>praise: its amp modeling is outstanding (and better sounding than 
>anything I have heard, including both all kinds of expensive plugins and 
>other hardware solutions). So if you just try to see it as a combined POD 
>and Bass POD and see the other functions as some added gimmick, you may 
>be happy with it. However, if you're looking for a guitar floorboard with 
>great multi-effects capabilities, go look somewhere else (note of the 
>editor: where? G-system?)
>
>
>         Rainer
>
>



-- 
Art Simon
simart@null.net
art.simon.tripod.com
myspace [dot] com/artsimon


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!