Re: timefactor

["Ian Popperwell" <popperwell@iname.com>]

Just got mine and starting to work this out too, I think that it is the 
previous loop that fades away at the defined level - this is what you 
describe as the base loop + previous overdubs (which themselves become 
part 
of the base loop).

Although a short looper (only 12 seconds at full bandwidth), and I didn't 
primarily buy it for its looper, It looks like there are some good 
features 
in it and some major omissions (which is tiresome given all the feedback 
abouot what makes a good looper).

It will be good to work out stuff with it.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Toby G" <carpet8@mac.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 5:25 AM
Subject: timefactor


> Hey,
>
> Can anybody describe more clearly than the timefactor manual does, the 
>way 
> the decay works on the looper?  For example, which fades out--the 
>original 
> 'base' loop, or the overdubs?  Or both?
>
>
> toby
>
>
>