![]() |
|||||
| Support Looper's Delight!! |
|||||
![]() Get the Looper's Delight Vol 3 CD! |
|||||||||||||||||
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Expression vs Vol pedal for midi control
Krispen Hartung wrote: >> That's misleading. >> Sure, in Max you can compensate for a mis-matched pedal. >> (with some loss of definition) >> ...but a midi-controller, of FX unit needs a pedal with >> the correct spec. > > Not sure I follow you. Why do you think there would be loss of > definition? If anything I have more, because I am not limited to 0-127, > but I can take a continuous amp change (down to as many decimal points > as I desire) and convert that into any range I like, mapped to an > express pedal. Quite so, but wasn't the original question to do with the suitability as a regular expression pedal? As a Max (or Bidule) specific solution it looks very neat if you can afford the audio channels. The only problem I can see with your approach is that in removing elements of the sine frequency to stop them modulating the control signal end up with a delay in the control signal, but then a rough 128 step controller also needs filtering. What frequency do you use? andy
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info This page is maintained by Kim Flint contact us |
||||||||||||
| Support Looper's Delight!! |
||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||