Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Get the Looper's Delight Vol 3 CD!
Get the Looper's Delight Vol 3 CD!
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Expression vs Vol pedal for midi control



Krispen Hartung wrote:
>> That's misleading.
>> Sure, in Max you can compensate for a mis-matched pedal.
>> (with some loss of definition)
>> ...but a midi-controller, of FX unit needs a pedal with
>> the correct spec.
> 
> Not sure I follow you. Why do you think there would be loss of 
> definition? If anything I have more, because I am not limited to 0-127, 
> but I can take a continuous amp change (down to as many decimal points 
> as I desire) and convert that into any range I like, mapped to an 
> express pedal. 

Quite so, but wasn't the original question to do with the suitability as
a regular expression pedal? As a Max (or Bidule) specific solution
it looks very neat if you can afford the audio channels.

The only problem I can see with your approach is that in removing elements
of the sine frequency to stop them modulating the control signal end up 
with a delay in the control signal, but then a rough 128 step controller 
also needs filtering.
What frequency do you use?

andy


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!