Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who uses "looping" in their promo material?



Title: Message
 
----- Original Message -----
 
[snip]
 
> Sooo...looping is one of the many tools in your toolbox for creating sound (just like the guitar or the ring modulator), and if it is one of the more important elements, you should mention it, just like somebody might mention that he is a guitarist.
 
Agreed that it is one of many tools. I'm just still grappling with whether it necessary to mention the tool. I am a guitarist, first and foremost. I use a lot of tools: max/msp, Reaktor, many patches, a volume pedal, etc, etc. I don't call myself a Live Reaktor Artists or a Volume Pedal Artist. My loop patch is just one of many things I use. Now, granted, I use the tool a lot (about 80% of the time), but such is also the case with max/msp (100% of the time)...it is on at all times and at least one max patch is running at all times. So, I agree with all of our original discussions where we said that you can indeed treat a piece of software, VST effect, etc as an instrument. That was a great discussion and very insightful. But for me, those instruments are still "second string", next to the guitar, which is my primary instrument feeding all of this work. For me, my line of thinking for the time being (it can always change), is that perhaps a different critieria, other than an effect or hardware device is being used as an instrument, is required to incorporate the descriptor of that gear in my artist title. It's a little similar the controversy in biology around the definition of life. Not remembering the complicated descriptions (as it has been over 10 years since I was a biology major), I do recall something about the entity (cell, structure, etc), having to be self-sufficient or be able to surive on its own in principle as an adult. In that mode of thought, when I play, my looping and effect tools are not self-sufficient. They require me to play  the guitar to get them to work. I don't show up for a gig with only my looping tools and effects, but either my guitar or my voice.

> Is the industry recognizing us for our accomplishments? Let me play devil's advocate and ask: what are (from the industry's pov) are exactly our accomplishments?

For staters, many looping festivals around the world; countless looping CDs, a lot of promo, articles in magazines, many videos, blogs, etc. That's a hell of a lot. It's quite amazing, actually.

Kris


 


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!
Support Looper's Delight, buy something from zZounds!
Support Looper's Delight, buy something from zZounds!