Re: Composers should also get paid (was: Fripp & Eno 1973 / BBC / Peel /RIAA)

["Travis Hartnett" <travishartnett@gmail.com>]

"Private use" usually being defined as "Making a copy of a recording
you've legally purchased for your own private use", not "Dubbing a
copy from a friend's purchased copy", which was the example offered
previously.

TH

On 7/9/07, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, doesn't American law have it legal to make a copy "for private
> use"? But the restaurants etc are mainly billed for using the music,
> not only the actual copy of the recording of the music. Those are two
> different rights, normally owned by composer/publisher and record
> label. I like that these matters come up on the list, lots of
> interesting posts so far :-)
>