RE: microphone

["Qua Veda" <qua@oregon.com>]

Curious, is that the mic that beatboxers use?   For live performance I
imagine you'd need a lot of anti-feedback rejection etc characteristics.  
-Q 

-----Original Message-----
From: Krispen Hartung [mailto:khartung@cableone.net] 
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 3:40 PM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: microphone

They also work good together. The Beyer has more bottom end, but the SM57 
is
crisper in the high end. Some recording engineers use both to record the
guitar, arranging them in a 90 degree angle and mixing them together. I
don't know if it's a fact that the Beyer is a high end version of the SM57,
though...there's only a $50-$60 difference on average.  Each probably has
its strengths depending on the application.  I'd consider both low-mid 
range
mics.

K-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill" <rs@moinlabs.de>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: AW: microphone


> Beyer M201. The "high-end-version" of the SM57. Clearer sound (which 
>means
> it will be better on acoustic instruments), hypercardiod pattern (means
> better anti-feedback/directional properties).
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: lifeisgood [mailto:lifeisgood@blueyonder.co.uk]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Mai 2007 23:46
> An: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Betreff: microphone
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering what would be a good quality all-purpose microphone
> for looping.
> I would have it on stage either handheld for vocals or on a stand
> for percussion and acoustic instruments etc.
> I guess good anti-feedback properties and quite high
> sensitivity/directional properties would be good for quieter stuff.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
>