Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
Please Support Looper's Delight! Any donation is appreciated!
Please Support Looper's Delight! Any donation is appreciated!
Looper's Delight
Looper Profiles
Tools of the Trade
Tips and Tricks
Musings
History of Looping
Loopography
Rec. Reading
Mailing List Info
Mailing List Archive
File Library

Support
Looper's Delight!
In Association with Amazon.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Help: RC-20XL or Digitech Jam-Man? Quantize feature?



I actually owned both the RC20XL and the Digitech jamman each for
about a month, for a while I had them both together to compare (before
I returned them both and upgraded to a more expensive looper). I would
say that if you are absolutely committed to having auto-quantize,
which I'm pretty sure is in fact how you describe it, then you clearly
need the boss. Since I was able to live with and compare both of these
pedals, though, here are some other things I would consider:

overall, I preferred the boss anyway. It just seemed more "friendly."
I actually preferred the sound quality, as the "distortion" that
reviewers describe sounded "musical" as in "good" to me, not distorted
like heavy metal or like a crappy system, and the "clean" sampling
rate of the digitech sounded a little too
clean/dry/crisp/unnatural/cold to me. It's hard to describe why it in
general seemed more "friendly" to me, perhaps the user interface, like
how the pedals worked, etc., had a hand in that. I had no interest in
USB capability, although I didn't think either that I would care much
about storing loops, but that is a nice feature of the digitech that
you realize after you fill up your boss. Also, I'm wary of the
reviewers that had a digitech crap out on them.

That all being stated, I think that with some practice you can get
better with your timing as to when you end a loop (and also as to what
you play within the loop), which makes the auto-quantize and the
metronome less essential. Also, that click track is very annoying to
anyone other than you (and, after a week, to you too), so if you
really are considering playing out I would strongly recommend against
using the click track anyway. That being stated, however, the digitech
has a few options as to what the click sounds like (e.g., bass, bass,
bass, high-hat) whereas the boss just has one that sounds more like a
metronome. All of this of course assumes that you can't follow the LED
of the metronome with the sound muted, which I certainly can't,
although you can mute the click on either one.

Hope those considerations help,
Eben



On 4/17/07, Brent Santin <woodenflutes@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I plan to loop live (flutes, keyboards, vocal sounds),
> i.e. on stage.
>
> I've been playing with a very basic looping pedal, and
> am really enjoying the results (it's a cheap ZOOM
> pedal which is basically is an endless digital delay).
>  I regularly set it for about a 2 second delay
> (although it can go up to 6 seconds), then record a
> short sound like a click and listen to the click
> repeat so that I can get a feel for the timing.  I
> then layer sounds & beats on top of this.
>
> If find that if I use anything longer than a 2 second
> digital delay, it's too long between my reference
> clicks to feel the beat, so I keep the delay time
> short.
>
> The problem with this short time is that while it's
> good for building rhythms, there's not enough time to
> put down a good bass line or even more than one chord.
>
> So, I've been considering a looping pedal with a built
> in click track/metronome so I can reliably keep my
> timing over loops that might be up to four or eight
> bars of 4/4 in length.
>
> I need some help in deciding between the Digi-tech
> Jam-Man or the BOSS RC-20XL.  Those are the two
> looping pedals in my price range with a built in
> click-track.
>
> Right off the bat, the Digitech seems to have better
> features for the money (especially the flash memory &
> USB connections, XLR mic connector).
>
> But it is missing one feature that the BOSS has: the
> QUANTIZE function.  I assume that when I press the
> STOP RECORDING pedal, this function clips or edits the
> end of the sample to match the nearest beat of the
> click-track, thereby keeping the sample in sync with
> the click-track. i.e. If I recorded a a one bar 4/4
> sample that, but was slightly late in hitting the STOP
> pedal, QUANTIZE would chop the extra few milliseconds
> off the sample so that it would end properly on the
> "4" beat.
>
> How important is this feature?  It seems important to
> me (just from reading).
>
> The Digitech Jam-Man does not offer this function.  So
> does that mean if I do not hit the STOP RECORDING
> pedal at the exact end-beat the click-track provides,
> my loops will eventually drift away from the metronome
> timing?
>
> This is my main concern.  I need my loops (I guess the
> foundation loop, anyway) to be dead on with the
> internal click track of the pedal.  If I need the
> QUANTIZE function for this, I guess I will have to go
> with the BOSS, even though it offers fewer features.
>
> Thanks in advance for your advice!
>
>
>       Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk 
>email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail at 
>http://mrd.mail.yahoo.com/try_beta?.intl=ca
>
>


Archive Top (Search) | Thread Index | Author Index
Looper's Delight Home | Looper's Delight Mailing List Info
This page is maintained by Kim Flint
contact us
Support
Looper's
Delight!!

In Association with Amazon.com
Any purchase you make through these links gives Looper's Delight a commission to keep us going. If you are buying it anyway, why not let some of your cash go to your favorite web site? Thanks!!